• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以问题为导向的药物信息的质量与影响:一种改变医生临床实践的方法?

Quality and impact of problem-oriented drug information: a method to change clinical practice among physicians?

作者信息

Schjøtt Jan, Pomp Erik, Gedde-Dahl Ane

机构信息

Regional Drug Information Centre (RELIS Vest), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Feb;57(12):897-902. doi: 10.1007/s00228-001-0386-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00228-001-0386-5
PMID:11936710
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Problem-oriented drug information is characterised by health professionals actively seeking drug information through various sources. In this study our objective was to determine the quality and impact of problem-oriented drug information among physicians.

METHODS

Evaluation forms accompanying 163 written answers to physicians from a drug information centre were used to examine the quality and impact of problem-oriented drug information during the period December 1996 to June 1998. Physicians were asked whether the preliminary telephone answer was useful and, furthermore, whether the written answer was fast enough, relevant, adequately comprehensive and had valuable references. Physicians were also asked whether the answer had caused any change in their clinical practice. If yes, they were then asked to describe the actual changes.

RESULTS

Of 163 evaluation forms, 117 (72%) were returned by physicians. Eighty-six physicians received a preliminary telephone answer and 83 (97%) stated that this was useful. Among the physicians, 92 (79%) found that the answer was fast enough, relevant, adequately comprehensive and with valuable references, while 19 (16%) found that the answer satisfied three of these four quality criteria. Seventy-one evaluation forms stated that the answer had caused a change in clinical practice. Sixty-eight (96%) of these contained a description of the change. Thirty-five evaluation forms that stated that the answers did not cause any change in clinical practice showed the same quality score as for the total group. Thus, 28 (80%) of these satisfied four and 5 (14%) satisfied three of the quality criteria. Improved routines for and control of ongoing pharmacotherapy was the most common change in clinical practice reported by physicians.

CONCLUSION

The results show that, in general, physicians found problem-oriented drug information to be of high quality, and that it had an impact on their clinical practice. Problem-oriented drug information could be a method to change clinical practice among physicians.

摘要

目的

以问题为导向的药物信息的特点是卫生专业人员通过各种渠道积极寻求药物信息。在本研究中,我们的目的是确定以问题为导向的药物信息在医生中的质量和影响。

方法

使用药物信息中心收到的163份医生书面回复所附带的评估表,来检查1996年12月至1998年6月期间以问题为导向的药物信息的质量和影响。询问医生初步的电话回复是否有用,此外,书面回复是否足够迅速、相关、全面且有有价值的参考文献。还询问医生该回复是否导致其临床实践发生任何变化。如果是,接着请他们描述实际的变化。

结果

在163份评估表中,有117份(72%)被医生退回。86名医生收到了初步的电话回复,其中83名(97%)表示这很有用。在这些医生中,92名(79%)认为回复足够迅速、相关、全面且有有价值的参考文献,而19名(16%)认为回复满足这四项质量标准中的三项。71份评估表表明回复导致了临床实践的改变。其中68份(96%)包含了对变化的描述。35份表明回复未导致临床实践发生任何变化的评估表与整个组的质量得分相同。因此,其中28份(80%)满足四项质量标准,5份(14%)满足三项质量标准。医生报告的临床实践中最常见的变化是改进了正在进行的药物治疗的常规操作和控制。

结论

结果表明,总体而言,医生认为以问题为导向的药物信息质量很高,并且对他们的临床实践有影响。以问题为导向的药物信息可能是改变医生临床实践的一种方法。

相似文献

1
Quality and impact of problem-oriented drug information: a method to change clinical practice among physicians?以问题为导向的药物信息的质量与影响:一种改变医生临床实践的方法?
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Feb;57(12):897-902. doi: 10.1007/s00228-001-0386-5.
2
Problem-oriented drug information: physicians' expectations and impact on clinical practice.以问题为导向的药物信息:医生的期望及其对临床实践的影响
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 May;65(5):515-22. doi: 10.1007/s00228-008-0604-5. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
3
[What do health professionals ask RELIS Vest service and how satisfied are they with the answers?].[健康专业人员对RELIS Vest服务提出了哪些问题,他们对得到的答案满意度如何?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2000 Jan 20;120(2):204-7.
4
Drug use in pregnancy--physicians' evaluation of quality and clinical impact of drug information centres.孕期用药——医生对药物信息中心质量及临床影响的评估
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Mar;65(3):303-8. doi: 10.1007/s00228-008-0593-4. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
5
Evaluation of the ability of seven herbal resources to answer questions about herbal products asked in drug information centers.评估七种草药资源回答药物信息中心所提关于草药产品问题的能力。
Pharmacotherapy. 2002 Dec;22(12):1611-5. doi: 10.1592/phco.22.17.1611.34126.
6
[Written drug advertisements--are they reliable?].[书面药品广告——它们可靠吗?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2006 May 11;126(10):1314-7.
7
Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.日本作为超老龄化社会的领跑者:来自日本医学与医疗护理的视角
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jun;15(6):673-87. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12450. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
8
Physicians' opinions of the accuracy, accessibility, and frequency of use of ten sources of new drug information.医生对十种新药信息来源的准确性、可获取性及使用频率的看法。
South Med J. 1986 Apr;79(4):441-3. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198604000-00013.
9
A drug information service quality assurance audit.药物信息服务质量保证审计
Hosp Formul. 1989 Jul;24(7):383-6, 388-9.
10
Patient-care questions that physicians are unable to answer.医生无法回答的患者护理问题。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jul-Aug;14(4):407-14. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2398. Epub 2007 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug information centre queries and responses about drug interactions over 10 years-A descriptive analysis.药物信息中心关于药物相互作用的十年查询与回复——描述性分析
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2020 Jan;126(1):65-74. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13294. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
2
Norwegian drug information centres strongly promote person-centred and personalised medicine: a brief report on the achievements and strategy.挪威药品信息中心大力推广以患者为中心的个性化医疗:关于成果与策略的简要报告
EPMA J. 2019 Apr 30;10(2):109-114. doi: 10.1007/s13167-019-00167-0. eCollection 2019 Jun.
3
Use of References in Responses from Scandinavian Drug Information Centres.
斯堪的纳维亚药物信息中心回复中参考文献的使用。
Medicines (Basel). 2018 Jul 1;5(3):66. doi: 10.3390/medicines5030066.
4
Factors associated with time consumption when answering drug-related queries to Scandinavian drug information centres: a multi-centre study.斯堪的纳维亚药物信息中心回答药物相关问题时与时间消耗相关的因素:一项多中心研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Nov;70(11):1395-401. doi: 10.1007/s00228-014-1749-z. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
5
Joint medicine-information and pharmacovigilance services could improve detection and communication about drug-safety problems.联合医学信息与药物警戒服务可以改善对药物安全问题的发现与沟通。
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2014 Jul 1;6:89-92. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S63680. eCollection 2014.
6
Questions about complementary and alternative medicine to the Regional Medicines Information and Pharmacovigilance Centres in Norway (RELIS): a descriptive pilot study.挪威地区药品信息和药物警戒中心(RELIS)收到的有关补充和替代医学的问题:一项描述性试点研究。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014 Feb 14;14:56. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-56.
7
A question-answer pair (QAP) database integrated with websites to answer complex questions submitted to the Regional Medicines Information and Pharmacovigilance Centres in Norway (RELIS): a descriptive study.一个与网站集成的问答对(QAP)数据库,用于回答提交给挪威地区药品信息和药物警戒中心(RELIS)的复杂问题:一项描述性研究。
BMJ Open. 2012 Mar 15;2(2):e000642. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000642. Print 2012.
8
Which factors predict the time spent answering queries to a drug information centre?哪些因素可以预测向药物信息中心咨询问题的回答时间?
Pharm World Sci. 2010 Dec;32(6):799-804. doi: 10.1007/s11096-010-9440-7. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
9
Problem-oriented drug information: physicians' expectations and impact on clinical practice.以问题为导向的药物信息:医生的期望及其对临床实践的影响
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 May;65(5):515-22. doi: 10.1007/s00228-008-0604-5. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
10
Drug use in pregnancy--physicians' evaluation of quality and clinical impact of drug information centres.孕期用药——医生对药物信息中心质量及临床影响的评估
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Mar;65(3):303-8. doi: 10.1007/s00228-008-0593-4. Epub 2008 Dec 4.