de la Marnierre E, Mage F, Alberti M, Batisse J L, Baltenneck A
Hôpital d'instruction des Armées Desgenettes, 108, bd Pinel, 69275 Lyon Cedex 03, France.
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2002 Feb;25(2):161-5.
To compare two methods of sub-tenon anesthesia in 80 surgical procedures (phakoemulsification, glaucoma and combined surgery) in a prospective, single-surgeon study.
Forty patients requiring anterior segment surgery in each eye were randomised to receive subtenon anaesthesia by either Greenbaum's method (using a flexible plastic cannula) or Ripart's method (using a 23G hypodermic needle). Randomization dictated the mode of anaesthesia for the first eye, the other technique being used for the second eye. Anaesthesia consisted of 1.5ml lidocaïne 2% and 1.5ml bupivacaïne 0.5% in all cases, and was performed by the same surgeon (EDLM) immediately before surgery. Type of surgical procedure, duration, complications, presence of sub-conjunctival haemorrhage, were assessed by the surgeon, who also graded chemosis (0-3), nuclear hardness (1-4), and ocular akinesia (0-2) for each patient. Pain was scored subjectively by each patient (0-10) during the injection, peroperatively and postoperatively.
Chemosis was significatively higher with Greenbaum's method than Ripart's method (p<0.01) and was sometimes undesirable for the surgeon. There was no difference in the pain score during the injection, preoperatively or postoperatively. Pain was usually very light and did not correlate with the duration of surgery. There was no akinesia in the majority of cases with either method, but the surgeon was sometimes limited by the akinesia of the medial rectus muscle and often by that of the inferior rectus muscle with elevation of the globe.
Greenbaum's method and Ripart's method are two subtenon anesthesic techniques characterized by an immediate, intense and prolonged analgesia (sometimes 60mn). Complete akinesia is rare and this is sometimes limiting. Chemosis was more often associated with Greenbaum's method, but Ripart's method carries the potential for needle-related complications.
在一项前瞻性单术者研究中,比较80例手术操作(超声乳化白内障吸除术、青光眼手术及联合手术)中两种球后麻醉方法。
每只眼需要进行眼前节手术的40例患者被随机分为两组,分别接受格林鲍姆法(使用可弯曲塑料套管)或里帕尔法(使用23G皮下注射针)进行球后麻醉。随机分组决定第一只眼的麻醉方式,另一种技术用于第二只眼。所有病例的麻醉均由1.5ml 2%利多卡因和1.5ml 0.5%布比卡因组成,且均由同一位术者(EDLM)在手术即将开始前进行操作。术者评估手术操作类型、持续时间、并发症、结膜下出血情况,同时对每位患者的球结膜水肿(0 - 3级)、晶状体核硬度(1 - 4级)和眼球运动不能(0 - 2级)进行分级。每位患者在注射过程中、手术期间及术后对疼痛进行主观评分(0 - 10分)。
格林鲍姆法导致的球结膜水肿明显高于里帕尔法(p<0.01),有时这对术者来说是不理想的。注射过程中、术前或术后的疼痛评分无差异。疼痛通常非常轻微,且与手术持续时间无关。两种方法在大多数情况下均未出现眼球运动不能,但术者有时会受到内直肌眼球运动不能的限制,在眼球上转时还经常受到下直肌眼球运动不能的限制。
格林鲍姆法和里帕尔法是两种球后麻醉技术,其特点是起效迅速、镇痛强烈且持久(有时长达60分钟)。完全性眼球运动不能很少见,有时会造成限制。球结膜水肿更常与格林鲍姆法相关,但里帕尔法存在与针相关并发症的风险。