Suppr超能文献

非处方镇痛药:毒理学视角

Over-the-counter analgesics: a toxicology perspective.

作者信息

Jones Alison

机构信息

National Poisons Information Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Ther. 2002 May-Jun;9(3):245-57. doi: 10.1097/00045391-200205000-00010.

Abstract

The decision to use any analgesic is a balance of benefit and risk. In the case of analgesics, it is important to balance the therapeutic benefit against both the risk in therapeutic use and the risk (and ease of treatment) in overdose. Paracetamol in therapeutic dose carries little risk of adverse events. Less than 0.1% of the estimated 30 million paracetamol users in the United Kingdom attend hospital with a paracetamol overdose each year, and approximately 200 people die, most of whom presented late or did not receive antidote, N-acetylcysteine, within 12 hours. Nonsteriodal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have greater adverse effects in therapeutic use than paracetamol but also have a lower incidence of severe features or death in overdose. There is no antidote available for NSAID poisoning. Aspirin carries both significant adverse effects in therapeutic dose and a substantial risk in overdose, for which there is no antidote. Its risk-benefit profile is probably the poorest of all analgesics currently available over-the-counter (OTC); this is reflected in current trends both in analgesic use and overdose figures. Although a number of options to reduce deaths from poisoning by OTC analgesics have been considered, few are practical, and all must take account of the public health benefits provided by these drugs. A perspective should be retained that the vast majority of the population in Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Denmark derive therapeutic benefit from OTC analgesics and do not take them in overdose. The majority of those who do take overdoses come to little or no harm. Management of serious poisoning by paracetamol, aspirin, or NSAIDs remains a medical challenge.

摘要

使用任何一种镇痛药的决定都是在权衡益处和风险。就镇痛药而言,平衡治疗益处与治疗使用中的风险以及过量用药时的风险(和治疗的难易程度)非常重要。治疗剂量的对乙酰氨基酚产生不良事件的风险很小。在英国,估计有3000万对乙酰氨基酚使用者,每年因对乙酰氨基酚过量而住院的人数不到0.1%,约200人死亡,其中大多数人就诊较晚或在12小时内未接受解毒剂N-乙酰半胱氨酸治疗。非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)在治疗使用中的不良反应比对乙酰氨基酚更大,但过量用药时出现严重症状或死亡的发生率也较低。NSAID中毒没有可用的解毒剂。阿司匹林在治疗剂量时就有显著的不良反应,过量用药时风险也很大,且没有解毒剂。在目前所有非处方(OTC)镇痛药中,其风险效益比可能是最差的;这在镇痛药使用趋势和过量用药数据中都有所体现。尽管已经考虑了多种减少OTC镇痛药中毒死亡的方法,但很少有可行的,而且所有方法都必须考虑到这些药物所带来的公共卫生益处。应该保持这样一种观点,即澳大利亚、美国、英国和丹麦的绝大多数人口都从OTC镇痛药中获得了治疗益处,并且不会过量服用。大多数过量服药的人几乎没有受到伤害。对乙酰氨基酚、阿司匹林或NSAIDs严重中毒的管理仍然是一项医学挑战。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验