• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输血医学医疗事件报告系统:它能帮助将正确的血液输给正确的患者吗?

The Medical Event Reporting System for Transfusion Medicine: will it help get the right blood to the right patient?

作者信息

Kaplan Harold S, Callum Jeannie L, Rabin Fastman Barbara, Merkley Lisa L

机构信息

New York Presbyterian Hospital and Columbia University, Harkness Pavilion 4-418, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Transfus Med Rev. 2002 Apr;16(2):86-102. doi: 10.1053/tmrv.2002.31459.

DOI:10.1053/tmrv.2002.31459
PMID:11941572
Abstract

The Medical Event Reporting System for Transfusion Medicine (MERS-TM) collects, classifies, and analyzes events that potentially could compromise the safety of transfused blood to facilitate system improvement. This system is designed to collect data on near misses as well as actual events. Near-miss events are a valuable source of data because they occur more frequently than, but share many characteristics and causes of, actual events. Further, although most current reporting efforts describe only what has occurred with little attention to what caused the event, MERS-TM includes a standardized method of causal analysis. The standardization provided by MERS allows users to compare their experience with that of other organizations, which speeds learning across the entire transfusion medicine community. Important features of the MERS-TM system are that it is able to capture threats, hazards, near misses, injuries, and deaths; characterizes failures and recoveries systematically; identifies and provides causal codes for the entire range of system defects including technical, organizational, cultural, and human factors; raises staff awareness about error management; is easily integrated with existing quality assurance programs; has a consistent and straightforward classification method; enables compliance with mandatory Food and Drug Administration reporting and accreditation requirements; has features to deal with a high volume of reports; supplies Web-based training, data entry, and analysis; and provides comparative benchmarks from comparable institutions.

摘要

输血医学医疗事件报告系统(MERS-TM)收集、分类和分析可能危及输血安全的事件,以促进系统改进。该系统旨在收集未遂事件以及实际事件的数据。未遂事件是宝贵的数据来源,因为它们比实际事件发生得更频繁,且与实际事件有许多共同的特征和原因。此外,尽管目前大多数报告工作只描述了发生的事情,而很少关注事件发生的原因,但MERS-TM包括一种标准化的因果分析方法。MERS提供的标准化使用户能够将自己的经验与其他组织的经验进行比较,从而加快整个输血医学界的学习速度。MERS-TM系统的重要特点包括:能够捕获威胁、危险、未遂事件、伤害和死亡;系统地描述故障和恢复情况;识别并为包括技术、组织、文化和人为因素在内的所有系统缺陷提供因果代码;提高工作人员对差错管理的认识;易于与现有的质量保证计划整合;有一致且简单的分类方法;能够符合美国食品药品监督管理局的强制报告和认证要求;具备处理大量报告的功能;提供基于网络的培训、数据录入和分析;并提供来自可比机构的比较基准。

相似文献

1
The Medical Event Reporting System for Transfusion Medicine: will it help get the right blood to the right patient?输血医学医疗事件报告系统:它能帮助将正确的血液输给正确的患者吗?
Transfus Med Rev. 2002 Apr;16(2):86-102. doi: 10.1053/tmrv.2002.31459.
2
Identification and classification of the causes of events in transfusion medicine.输血医学中事件原因的识别与分类。
Transfusion. 1998 Nov-Dec;38(11-12):1071-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.38111299056319.x.
3
Getting the right blood to the right patient: the contribution of near-miss event reporting and barrier analysis.将正确的血液输给正确的患者:险些发生的事件报告及障碍分析的作用
Transfus Clin Biol. 2005 Nov;12(5):380-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2005.10.003. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
4
Reporting of near-miss events for transfusion medicine: improving transfusion safety.输血医学中险些发生的不良事件报告:提高输血安全性。
Transfusion. 2001 Oct;41(10):1204-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41101204.x.
5
Implementation of an event reporting system in a transfusion medicine unit: a local experience.输血医学科事件报告系统的实施:本地经验
Malays J Pathol. 2004 Jun;26(1):43-8.
6
Experience with the medical event reporting system for transfusion medicine (MERS-TM) at three hospitals.三家医院的输血医学医疗事件报告系统(MERS-TM)的经验。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2004 Oct;31(2):133-43. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2004.07.007.
7
Root cause analysis of transfusion error: identifying causes to implement changes.输血错误的根本原因分析:确定原因以实施变更。
Transfusion. 2010 Dec;50(12 Pt 2):2772-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02943.x.
8
Seven hundred and fifty-nine (759) chances to learn: a 3-year pilot project to analyse transfusion-related near-miss events in the Republic of Ireland.759次学习机会:一项为期三年的试点项目,旨在分析爱尔兰共和国与输血相关的未遂事件。
Vox Sang. 2007 Apr;92(3):233-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2006.00885.x.
9
Providing feedback to users on unacceptable practice in the delivery of a hospital transfusion service--a pilot study.
Transfus Med. 2002 Apr;12(2):129-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3148.2002.00362.x.
10
Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data.患者安全事件报告能否用于比较医院安全性?对英国国家报告与学习系统数据的定量分析结果
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 9;10(12):e0144107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144107. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Prescription Precision: A Comprehensive Review of Intelligent Prescription Systems.**处方精准度**:智能处方系统全面综述
Curr Pharm Des. 2024;30(34):2671-2684. doi: 10.2174/0113816128321623240719104337.
2
The Effective Strategies to Avoid Medication Errors and Improving Reporting Systems.避免用药错误及改进报告系统的有效策略。
Medicines (Basel). 2021 Aug 27;8(9):46. doi: 10.3390/medicines8090046.
3
Unit-based incident reporting and root cause analysis: variation at three hospital unit types.基于科室的事件报告与根本原因分析:三种医院科室类型的差异
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 21;6(6):e011277. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011277.
4
Towards the creation of a flexible classification scheme for voluntarily reported transfusion and laboratory safety events.迈向创建一个用于自愿报告的输血及实验室安全事件的灵活分类方案。
J Biomed Semantics. 2012 May 18;3:4. doi: 10.1186/2041-1480-3-4.
5
Error management in blood establishments: results of eight years of experience (2003-2010) at the Croatian Institute of Transfusion Medicine.血站的差错管理:克罗地亚输血医学研究所八年(2003-2010 年)经验的结果。
Blood Transfus. 2012 Jul;10(3):311-20. doi: 10.2450/2012.0075-11. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
6
Do expert assessments converge? An exploratory case study of evaluating and managing a blood supply risk.专家评估是否趋同?评估和管理血液供应风险的探索性案例研究。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Aug 24;11:666. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-666.
7
Patients' positive identification systems.患者身份识别系统。
Blood Transfus. 2009 Oct;7(4):313-8. doi: 10.2450/2009.0001-09.
8
Web-based hazard and near-miss reporting as part of a patient safety curriculum.基于网络的危害和险兆事件报告作为患者安全课程的一部分。
J Nurs Educ. 2009 Dec;48(12):669-77. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20091113-03.
9
Organization and representation of patient safety data: current status and issues around generalizability and scalability.患者安全数据的组织与呈现:关于普遍性和可扩展性的现状与问题
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Nov-Dec;11(6):468-78. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1317. Epub 2004 Aug 6.
10
Coverage of patient safety terms in the UMLS metathesaurus.《统一医学语言系统》元词表中患者安全术语的覆盖情况。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:110-4.