Stanley G, Kaplan I, Poole C
J Gen Psychol. 1975 Jul;93(2d Half):67-72.
A sample of 33 dyslexic and 33 control children were compared on tasks involving visual matching with spatial transformation (VMST), tactual serial matching (TSM), visual sequential memory (VSM), and auditory sequential memory (ASM). Contrary to expectation, the dyslexics performed at the same level as controls on VMST. This result was not explicable as a floor or ceiling effect and was considered evidence that dyslexics do not suffer impairment in visual spatial transformation ability per se. Dyslexics were not significantly different on TSM, but were inferior to controls on VSM and ASM.
对33名诵读困难儿童和33名对照儿童进行了比较，比较任务包括视觉匹配与空间转换（VMST）、触觉序列匹配（TSM）、视觉序列记忆（VSM）和听觉序列记忆（ASM）。与预期相反，诵读困难儿童在VMST任务上的表现与对照组相同。这一结果无法解释为地板效应或天花板效应，被认为是诵读困难儿童本身在视觉空间转换能力方面没有受损的证据。诵读困难儿童在TSM任务上没有显著差异，但在VSM和ASM任务上不如对照组。
