Ben-Yehudah Gal, Ahissar Merav
Department of Neurobiology, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91905, Israel.
Vision Res. 2004 May;44(10):1047-63. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.12.001.
The degree and nature of dyslexics' difficulties in performing basic visual tasks have been debated for more than thirty years. We recently found that dyslexics' difficulties in detecting temporally modulated gratings are specific to conditions that require accurate comparisons between sequentially presented stimuli [Brain 124 (2001) 1381]. We now examine dyslexics' spatial frequency discrimination (rather than detection), under simultaneous (spatial forced choice) and sequential (temporal forced choice) presentations. Sequential presentation (at SOAs of 0.5, 0.75 and 2.25 s) yielded better discrimination thresholds among the majority of controls (around 0.5 c/ degrees reference), but not among dyslexics. Consequently, there was a (large and significant) group effect only for the sequential conditions. Within the same dyslexic group, performance on a sequential auditory task, two-tone frequency discrimination, was impaired in a smaller proportion of the participants. Taken together, our findings indicate that visual paradigms requiring sequential comparisons are difficult for the majority of dyslexic individuals, perhaps because deficits either in visual perception or in visual memory could both lead to difficulties on these paradigms.
阅读障碍者在执行基本视觉任务时所面临困难的程度和性质,已经被争论了三十多年。我们最近发现,阅读障碍者在检测随时间调制的光栅时所遇到的困难,特定于需要对顺序呈现的刺激进行精确比较的条件下[《大脑》124卷(2001年)第1381页]。我们现在在同时呈现(空间强制选择)和顺序呈现(时间强制选择)的情况下,研究阅读障碍者的空间频率辨别(而非检测)能力。顺序呈现(刺激呈现间隔为0.5、0.75和2.25秒)在大多数对照组中产生了更好的辨别阈值(约为0.5周/度参考值),但在阅读障碍者中并非如此。因此,仅在顺序呈现条件下存在(大且显著的)组间效应。在同一阅读障碍者群体中,在顺序听觉任务(双音频率辨别)中表现受损的参与者比例较小。综合来看,我们的研究结果表明,需要顺序比较的视觉范式对大多数阅读障碍个体来说是困难的,这可能是因为视觉感知或视觉记忆方面的缺陷都可能导致在这些范式上出现困难。