• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在为你的组织注入灵魂的同时,不让自己迷失其中。

Instilling a soul in your organization without losing yours to it.

作者信息

Stegall M Scott

机构信息

Health Care Administration and Informatics Program, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

出版信息

Clin Leadersh Manag Rev. 2002 Mar-Apr;16(2):85-9.

PMID:11951544
Abstract

Health-care professionals are accustomed to struggling with ethical considerations brought about by advances in the medical sciences. How aware are these professionals of the ethical dilemmas created by advances in the management sciences? Deeply embedded in organizational and departmental changes are theories, paradigms, and philosophies that often are understood poorly even by their promoters. Although these system changes can occur at glacial speed, they also can be glacial in their effects on an organization's culture. Are individuals aware that the latest implemented management fad is changing their behaviors? By becoming mindful of the potential ramifications of change, individuals increase their ability to behave in a civil manner--that is, ethically choosing to embrace or resist the change. By acting within their own sphere of influence, civil individuals at all levels of the organization collectively instill a soul in their organization rather than losing their own souls to it. This article is adapted from a commencement speech presented to graduates of an executive health-care administration program. Most of these graduates were a mixture of hospital department heads, middle managers, and a few medical and hospital executives. Each year, I distribute my current version of this teaching note or mini-lecture to students completing my leadership class in hope that it will help them put in perspective the appropriate use of the management sciences they intensely study.

摘要

医疗保健专业人员已习惯于应对医学科学进步所带来的伦理考量。这些专业人员对管理科学进步所造成的伦理困境有多了解呢?组织和部门变革中深深嵌入的理论、范式和理念,往往即便其倡导者也理解得并不透彻。尽管这些系统变革可能以极慢的速度发生,但它们对组织文化的影响也可能十分迟缓。人们是否意识到最新实施的管理风尚正在改变他们的行为呢?通过留意变革的潜在影响,人们能够提升以文明方式行事的能力,也就是说,从伦理角度选择接受或抵制变革。通过在自身影响力范围内采取行动,组织各级的文明个体共同为组织注入灵魂,而非在其中迷失自我。本文改编自一篇面向医疗保健行政高级管理项目毕业生的毕业典礼演讲。这些毕业生大多是医院各科室主任、中层管理人员,以及少数医疗和医院管理人员的混合群体。每年,我都会将这份教学笔记或小型讲座的最新版本分发给修读我领导力课程的学生,希望它能帮助他们正确看待他们深入学习的管理科学的合理应用。

相似文献

1
Instilling a soul in your organization without losing yours to it.在为你的组织注入灵魂的同时,不让自己迷失其中。
Clin Leadersh Manag Rev. 2002 Mar-Apr;16(2):85-9.
2
Is your organization project management savvy?你的组织精通项目管理吗?
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2003 Winter;17(1):50-4.
3
Diversity leadership and organizational transformation: performance indicators for health services organizations.多元化领导力与组织转型:卫生服务组织的绩效指标
J Healthc Manag. 1999 Nov-Dec;44(6):427-39.
4
The role of middle managers in the transmission and integration of organizational culture.中层管理者在组织文化的传播与整合中的作用。
J Healthc Manag. 2004 Nov-Dec;49(6):393-404; discussion 404.
5
Establishing values-based leadership and value systems in healthcare organizations.在医疗保健组织中建立基于价值观的领导力和价值体系。
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2008 Fall;31(2):179-97.
6
The power of the soul. Business expertise is not enough; executives in Catholic health care must be spiritual leaders, too.灵魂的力量。商业专业知识是不够的;天主教医疗保健机构的高管也必须是精神领袖。
Health Prog. 2002 Sep-Oct;83(5):20-4, 51.
7
The health care executive as a singular presence.作为个体存在的医疗保健高管。
J Health Adm Educ. 2001;Spec No:69-80.
8
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
9
Performance appraisal: a primer for the lower level health care and rehabilitation worker.
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2000 Winter;22(3):374-8.
10
Spirituality and healthcare organizations.精神层面与医疗保健机构
J Healthc Manag. 2001 Jan-Feb;46(1):39-50; discussion 50-2.