• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利多卡因稀释后肌内注射厄他培南的安全性和局部耐受性:一项与肌内注射头孢曲松对比的前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。

Safety and local tolerability of intramuscularly administered ertapenem diluted in lidocaine: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study versus intramuscular ceftriaxone.

作者信息

Legua Pedro, Lema Juan, Moll Joy, Jiang Qi, Woods Gail, Friedland Ian

机构信息

Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2002 Mar;24(3):434-44. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)85044-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0149-2918(02)85044-5
PMID:11952026
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ertapenem is a new, structurally unique, parenteral beta-lactam antimicrobial agent that can be administered once daily.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the local tolerability of ertapenem 1 g once a day administered intramuscularly (IM) versus IM ceftriaxone, with both drugs reconstituted in lidocaine.

METHODS

In this prospective, double-blind, multicenter study, adult patients with lower respiratory tract infection, skin infection, or urinary tract infection requiring initial parenteral therapy were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to treatment with IM ertapenem 1 g once daily or IM ceftriaxone 1 g once daily. Although study drugs were administered by unmasked personnel, the patients, investigators, and the sponsor medical reviewer were blinded. Patients who improved clinically could be switched to oral amoxicillin-clavulanate after at least 2 days of IM therapy. Tolerability and safety analyses were carried out for the treated population, and efficacy analyses were performed for the modified intent-to-treat population.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients were randomized. The 87 patients in the ertapenem group and 30 in the ceftriaxone group received IM therapy for a mean duration of 4.1 and 3.8 days, respectively. During treatment, 35.6% (31/87) of patients treated with ertapenem and 43.3% (13/30) of those treated with ceftriaxone experienced > or =1 symptom at the local injection site; the most common symptom was tenderness, followed by pain. Symptoms were moderate to severe in only 1 patient (1.1%) in the ertapenem group and 3 patients (10.0%) in the ceftriaxone group. Clinical drug-related adverse events were reported during IM therapy in 14 patients (16.1%) in the ertapenem group and 5 patients (16.7%) in the ceftriaxone group. Mean +/- SD creatine kinase concentrations, measured in all patients, were 204.8+/-234.8 U/L at the end of IM ertapenem therapy and 382.9+/-721.1 U/L at the end of IM ceftriaxone therapy; at follow-up, values had returned to normal or had decreased in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Ertapenem 1 g (reconstituted in lidocaine) administered once daily IM was generally well tolerated. The tolerability and safety profiles of IM ertapenem therapy in this study were comparable to those of IM ceftriaxone therapy.

摘要

背景

厄他培南是一种新型的、结构独特的肠外β-内酰胺类抗菌药物,每日给药一次。

目的

本研究比较了每日一次肌内注射(IM)1 g厄他培南与IM头孢曲松的局部耐受性,两种药物均用利多卡因复溶。

方法

在这项前瞻性、双盲、多中心研究中,需要初始肠外治疗的下呼吸道感染、皮肤感染或尿路感染的成年患者按3:1的比例随机分配,接受每日一次IM 1 g厄他培南或每日一次IM 1 g头孢曲松治疗。尽管研究药物由未设盲的人员给药,但患者、研究者和申办方医学审评员均处于盲态。临床症状改善的患者在IM治疗至少2天后可改用口服阿莫西林-克拉维酸。对治疗人群进行耐受性和安全性分析,对改良意向性治疗人群进行疗效分析。

结果

共117例患者随机分组。厄他培南组的87例患者和头孢曲松组的30例患者接受IM治疗的平均持续时间分别为4.1天和3.8天。治疗期间,接受厄他培南治疗的患者中有35.6%(31/87)、接受头孢曲松治疗的患者中有43.3%(13/30)在局部注射部位出现≥1种症状;最常见的症状是压痛,其次是疼痛。厄他培南组仅1例患者(1.1%)、头孢曲松组3例患者(10.0%)的症状为中重度。IM治疗期间,厄他培南组14例患者(16.1%)和头孢曲松组5例患者(16.7%)报告了与药物相关的临床不良事件。在所有患者中测量的平均±标准差肌酸激酶浓度,在IM厄他培南治疗结束时为204.8±234.8 U/L,在IM头孢曲松治疗结束时为382.9±721.1 U/L;随访时,所有病例的值均恢复正常或下降。

结论

每日一次IM给药1 g(用利多卡因复溶)的厄他培南耐受性一般良好。本研究中IM厄他培南治疗的耐受性和安全性与IM头孢曲松治疗相当。

相似文献

1
Safety and local tolerability of intramuscularly administered ertapenem diluted in lidocaine: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study versus intramuscular ceftriaxone.利多卡因稀释后肌内注射厄他培南的安全性和局部耐受性:一项与肌内注射头孢曲松对比的前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
Clin Ther. 2002 Mar;24(3):434-44. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)85044-5.
2
A prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter comparison of parenteral ertapenem and ceftriaxone for the treatment of hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia.一项关于静脉注射厄他培南与头孢曲松治疗社区获得性肺炎住院成人患者的前瞻性、随机、双盲多中心比较研究。
Clin Ther. 2002 Nov;24(11):1770-85. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)80078-9.
3
A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study comparing ertapenem and ceftriaxone followed by appropriate oral therapy for complicated urinary tract infections in adults.一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、双盲研究,比较厄他培南和头孢曲松随后联合适当口服疗法用于治疗成人复杂性尿路感染。
Urology. 2002 Jul;60(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01664-3.
4
A study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ertapenem versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.一项评估厄他培南与头孢曲松治疗成人社区获得性肺炎的疗效、安全性及耐受性的研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Apr 15;34(8):1076-83. doi: 10.1086/339543. Epub 2002 Mar 18.
5
Ertapenem versus ceftriaxone followed by appropriate oral therapy for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections in adults: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study.厄他培南与头孢曲松随后联合适当口服疗法治疗成人复杂性尿路感染:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲多中心研究的结果
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Sep;46(9):2895-900. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.9.2895-2900.2002.
6
Treatment of complicated urinary tract infection in adults: combined analysis of two randomized, double-blind, multicentre trials comparing ertapenem and ceftriaxone followed by appropriate oral therapy.成人复杂性尿路感染的治疗:两项随机、双盲、多中心试验的联合分析,比较厄他培南和头孢曲松随后进行适当口服治疗的效果。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Jun;53 Suppl 2:ii67-74. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh208.
7
Ertapenem monotherapy versus combination therapy with ceftriaxone plus metronidazole for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults.厄他培南单药治疗与头孢曲松加甲硝唑联合治疗成人复杂性腹腔内感染的对比研究
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2002 Sep;20(3):165-73. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(02)00160-7.
8
Ertapenem therapy for community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly.厄他培南治疗老年社区获得性肺炎
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Nov;51(11):1526-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51507.x.
9
Safety and tolerability of ertapenem versus ceftriaxone in a double-blind study performed in children with complicated urinary tract infection, community-acquired pneumonia or skin and soft-tissue infection.在患有复杂性尿路感染、社区获得性肺炎或皮肤及软组织感染的儿童中进行的一项双盲研究中,厄他培南与头孢曲松的安全性和耐受性比较
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009 Feb;33(2):163-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.08.005. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
10
Safety and tolerability of ertapenem.厄他培南的安全性和耐受性。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Jun;53 Suppl 2:ii75-81. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh209.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacokinetics of ertapenem following intravenous and subcutaneous infusions in patients.患者静脉和皮下输注厄他培南后的药代动力学。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Feb;54(2):924-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00836-09. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
2
Ertapenem: a review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections.厄他培南:其在治疗细菌感染中的应用综述
Drugs. 2005;65(15):2151-78. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565150-00013.