• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Ethics in international health research: a perspective from the developing world.国际卫生研究中的伦理:发展中世界的视角
Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(2):114-20.
2
Ethical issues in the NIMH Collaborative HIV/STD Prevention Trial.美国国立精神卫生研究所艾滋病病毒/性传播疾病预防合作试验中的伦理问题。
AIDS. 2007 Apr;21 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S69-80. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000266459.49138.b3.
3
Bioethics in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡的生物伦理学
East Mediterr Health J. 2006;12 Suppl 1:S73-9.
4
Ethical issues in international biomedical research: an overview.国际生物医学研究中的伦理问题:概述
J Health Law. 2004 Fall;37(4):629-65.
5
Building capacity in health research in the developing world.建设发展中世界卫生研究的能力。
Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Oct;82(10):764-70.
6
Ethical considerations of human investigation in developing countries: the AIDS dilemma.发展中国家人体研究的伦理考量:艾滋病困境
N Engl J Med. 1988 Oct 20;319(16):1083-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198810203191609.
7
Ethical issues in research in low-income countries.低收入国家研究中的伦理问题。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007 Jun;11(6):617-23.
8
Informed consent and collaborative research: perspectives from the developing world.知情同意与合作研究:来自发展中世界的观点
Dev World Bioeth. 2006 Mar;6(1):33-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00134.x.
9
Linking international research to global health equity: the limited contribution of bioethics.将国际研究与全球卫生公平联系起来:生物伦理学的有限贡献。
Bioethics. 2013 May;27(4):208-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01932.x. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
10
Enhancing the African bioethics initiative.加强非洲生物伦理倡议。
BMC Med Educ. 2004 Oct 15;4:21. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-4-21.

引用本文的文献

1
The Power of Professional Clinical Ethicists in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Ethiopian Perspective.低收入和中等收入国家专业临床伦理学家的作用:埃塞俄比亚视角
Am J Bioeth. 2025 Mar;25(3):95-98. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2025.2457692. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
2
Advancing collaborative research for health: why does collaboration matter?推进健康领域的合作研究:合作为何重要?
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Sep 16;9(9):e014971. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-014971.
3
The challenges and potential solutions of achieving meaningful consent amongst research participants in northern Thailand: a qualitative study.在泰国北部实现研究参与者有意义同意的挑战和潜在解决方案:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Dec 19;24(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00991-0.
4
No person left behind: Mapping the health policy landscape for genomics research in the Caribbean.一个都不能少:绘制加勒比地区基因组学研究的卫生政策蓝图。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Sep 18;15:100367. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100367. eCollection 2022 Nov.
5
Cross-cultural validation of the IRB Researcher Assessment Tool: Chinese Version.IRB 研究者评估工具的跨文化验证:中文版本。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 28;22(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00699-z.
6
Systematic review of research focused on pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV: A relational ethics perspective.系统综述聚焦于感染 HIV 的孕妇和产后妇女的研究:一种关系伦理视角。
Bioethics. 2021 Oct;35(8):829-838. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12917. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
7
Community engagement in public health: a bibliometric mapping of global research.社区参与公共卫生:全球研究的文献计量图谱
Arch Public Health. 2021 Jan 12;79(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00525-3.
8
Current Status of Research Ethics Capacity in Myanmar.缅甸研究伦理能力的现状
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2018 Jul;10(2):123-132. doi: 10.1007/s41649-018-0054-z. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
9
Toward Reducing Health Information Inequities in the Caribbean: Our Experience Building a Participatory Health Informatics Project.迈向减少加勒比地区健康信息不平等:我们参与式健康信息学项目的经验。
Ethn Dis. 2020 Apr 2;30(Suppl 1):193-202. doi: 10.18865/ed.30.S1.193. eCollection 2020.
10
Awareness of Jordanian Investigators About the Importance of Ethics Review Committees: A Pilot Study.约旦调查员对伦理审查委员会重要性的认识:一项初步研究。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Apr;26(2):821-831. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00139-7. Epub 2019 Sep 30.

国际卫生研究中的伦理:发展中世界的视角

Ethics in international health research: a perspective from the developing world.

作者信息

Bhutta Zulfiqar Ahmed

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(2):114-20.

PMID:11953789
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2567726/
Abstract

Health research plays a pivotal role in addressing inequities in health and human development, but to achieve these objectives the research must be based on sound scientific and ethical principles. Although it is accepted that ethics play a central role in health research in developing countries, much of the recent debate has focused on controversies surrounding internationally sponsored research and has taken place largely without adequate participation of the developing countries. The relationship between ethical guidelines and regulations, and indigenously sponsored and public health research has not been adequately explored. For example, while the fundamental principles of ethical health research, such as community participation, informed consent, and shared benefits and burdens, remain sacrosanct other issues, such as standards of care and prior agreements, merit greater public debate within developing countries. In particular, the relationship of existing ethical guidelines to epidemiological and public health research merits further exploration. In order to support health research in developing countries that is both relevant and meaningful, the focus must be on developing health research that promotes equity and on developing local capacity in bioethics. Only through such proactive measures can we address the emerging ethical dilemmas and challenges that globalization and the genomics revolution will bring in their wake.

摘要

卫生研究在解决卫生与人类发展方面的不平等问题上发挥着关键作用,但要实现这些目标,研究必须基于可靠的科学和伦理原则。尽管人们公认伦理在发展中国家的卫生研究中起着核心作用,但近期的许多辩论都集中在围绕国际资助研究的争议上,而且很大程度上是在发展中国家没有充分参与的情况下进行的。伦理准则和法规与本土资助的公共卫生研究之间的关系尚未得到充分探讨。例如,虽然社区参与、知情同意以及利益和负担共享等伦理卫生研究的基本原则仍然神圣不可侵犯,但诸如医疗标准和事先协议等其他问题,在发展中国家值得进行更多的公开辩论。特别是,现有伦理准则与流行病学和公共卫生研究的关系值得进一步探索。为了支持发展中国家开展既相关又有意义的卫生研究,重点必须放在开展促进公平的卫生研究以及培养当地生物伦理能力上。只有通过这些积极措施,我们才能应对全球化和基因组学革命随之而来的新出现的伦理困境和挑战。