• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项旨在提高初级保健提供者对患者转诊问题认知的简单干预措施的影响。

Impact of a simple intervention to increase primary care provider recognition of patient referral concerns.

作者信息

Albertson Gail, Lin C T, Schilling Lisa, Cyran Elizabeth, Anderson Susan, Anderson Robert J

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2002 Apr;8(4):375-81.

PMID:11954555
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a brief previsit questionnaire about referral concerns can improve primary care provider (PCP) recognition of patient concerns and satisfaction with care.

DESIGN

Sequential prospective study in the internal medicine clinic of an academic medical center providing primary care to patients enrolled in a gatekeeper-model managed care plan.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

Twelve faculty internists serving as PCPs for 1495 consecutive patient visits. Patients were given a previsit questionnaire asking about referral need and rationale and a postvisit questionnaire asking about discussion of referral concern and visit satisfaction. Providers were given a postvisit questionnaire asking whether a referral was discussed and made and about visit satisfaction. In the control phase, patient previsit questionnaires remained confidential, whereas in the intervention phase PCPs were shown the previsit questionnaires at the time of encounter.

RESULTS

The intervention significantly increased PCP referral recognition from 61% to 81% (P < .001) and was associated with increased visit satisfaction (P = .05). Satisfaction of PCPs with the referral discussion, overall rate of referral, and visit duration were not affected by the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a brief previsit questionnaire about patient referral concerns increases PCP recognition of such concerns. The intervention does not adversely affect PCP satisfaction with the referral discussion or the overall referral rate and may enhance patient visit satisfaction.

摘要

目的

确定一份关于转诊问题的简短就诊前问卷是否能提高初级保健提供者(PCP)对患者问题的认知以及对医疗服务的满意度。

设计

在一所学术医疗中心的内科诊所进行的序贯前瞻性研究,该诊所为参加守门人模式管理式医疗计划的患者提供初级保健服务。

参与者与方法

12名内科教员担任PCP,连续为1495名患者就诊。患者在就诊前会收到一份关于转诊需求和理由的问卷,就诊后会收到一份关于转诊问题讨论和就诊满意度的问卷。提供者在就诊后会收到一份问卷,询问是否讨论并进行了转诊以及就诊满意度。在对照阶段,患者就诊前问卷保持保密,而在干预阶段,PCP在接诊时会看到就诊前问卷。

结果

干预显著提高了PCP对转诊的认知,从61%提高到81%(P <.001),并与就诊满意度提高相关(P =.05)。PCP对转诊讨论的满意度、总体转诊率和就诊时长不受干预影响。

结论

使用一份关于患者转诊问题的简短就诊前问卷可提高PCP对这些问题的认知。该干预不会对PCP对转诊讨论的满意度或总体转诊率产生不利影响,且可能提高患者就诊满意度。

相似文献

1
Impact of a simple intervention to increase primary care provider recognition of patient referral concerns.一项旨在提高初级保健提供者对患者转诊问题认知的简单干预措施的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2002 Apr;8(4):375-81.
2
Patient desire and reasons for specialist referral in a gatekeeper-model managed care plan.在守门人模式管理式医疗计划中患者寻求专科转诊的意愿及原因。
Am J Manag Care. 2000 Jun;6(6):669-78.
3
Managed health plan effects on the specialty referral process: results from the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network referral study.管理式健康计划对专科转诊流程的影响:门诊哨点实践网络转诊研究结果
Med Care. 2003 Feb;41(2):242-53. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000044903.91168.B6.
4
Behind closed doors: management of patient expectations in primary care practices.门后之事:基层医疗实践中患者期望的管理
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 12;167(5):445-52. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.5.445.
5
Recognition of patient referral desires in an academic managed care plan frequency, determinants, and outcomes.在学术性管理式医疗计划中识别患者转诊意愿:频率、决定因素及结果
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Apr;15(4):242-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2000.02208.x.
6
Impact of a decline in Colorado Medicaid managed care enrollment on access and quality of preventive primary care services.科罗拉多医疗补助管理式医疗参保人数下降对预防性初级保健服务的可及性和质量的影响。
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):1474-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0923.
7
The association between patient-reported receipt of tobacco intervention at a primary care visit and smokers' satisfaction with their health care.患者报告在初级保健就诊时接受烟草干预与吸烟者对其医疗保健的满意度之间的关联。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2005 Apr;7 Suppl 1:S29-34. doi: 10.1080/14622200500078063.
8
Primary care physician specialty referral decision making: patient, physician, and health care system determinants.基层医疗医生专科转诊决策:患者、医生及医疗保健系统的决定因素
Med Decis Making. 2006 Jan-Feb;26(1):76-85. doi: 10.1177/0272989X05284110.
9
The influence of physician practice behaviors on patient satisfaction.医生执业行为对患者满意度的影响。
Fam Med. 1993 Jan;25(1):17-20.
10
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.

引用本文的文献

1
Applied techniques for putting pre-visit planning in clinical practice to empower patient-centered care in the pandemic era: a systematic review and framework suggestion.应用技术将预访规划付诸临床实践,以在大流行时代赋予以患者为中心的护理:系统评价和框架建议。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 13;21(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06456-7.
2
Referral interventions from primary to specialist care: a systematic review of international evidence.从初级保健到专科护理的转诊干预措施:国际证据的系统评价
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Dec;64(629):e765-74. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X682837.
3
Is referral to a spine surgeon a double-edged sword?: patient concerns before consultation.
转诊给脊柱外科医生是否是一把双刃剑?:咨询前患者的担忧。
Can Fam Physician. 2011 Jul;57(7):803-10.
4
Bridging the care continuum: patient information needs for specialist referrals.弥合护理连续体:患者对专科转诊的信息需求。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Sep 15;9:163. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-163.
5
Interventions before consultations for helping patients address their information needs.在咨询前进行干预,以帮助患者满足其信息需求。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD004565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004565.pub2.
6
Randomised controlled trial of effect of leaflets to empower patients in consultations in primary care.关于在基层医疗会诊中使用宣传资料增强患者能力效果的随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2004 Feb 21;328(7437):441. doi: 10.1136/bmj.37999.716157.44. Epub 2004 Feb 13.