• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

残疾:生物伦理学议程。

Disability: an agenda for bioethics.

作者信息

Kuczewski M G

机构信息

Loyola University Chicago, USA.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2001 Summer;1(3):36-44. doi: 10.1162/152651601750418026.

DOI:10.1162/152651601750418026
PMID:11954592
Abstract

Contemporary bioethics has been somewhat skewed by its focus on high-tech medicine and the resulting development of ethical frameworks based on an acute-care model of healthcare. Research and scholarship in bioethics have payed only cursory attention to ethical issues related to disability. I argue that bioethics should concern itself with the full range of theoretical and practical issues related to disability. This encounter with the disability community will enrich bioethics and, potentially, society as well. I suggest a number of items that the bioethics agenda should include, such as the development of a casuistry of the right to healthcare and to community integration and an advocacy role in fostering an understanding among the public and policy makers of the need to reform research and treatment related to disability.

摘要

当代生物伦理学在一定程度上因专注于高科技医学以及由此基于急症护理医疗模式发展出的伦理框架而有所偏差。生物伦理学的研究和学术仅粗略关注了与残疾相关的伦理问题。我认为生物伦理学应关注与残疾相关的所有理论和实际问题。与残疾群体的这种接触将丰富生物伦理学,并且可能也会丰富社会。我提出了一些生物伦理学议程应包含的事项,比如制定关于医疗保健权和融入社区权的决疑法,以及在促进公众和政策制定者理解改革与残疾相关的研究和治疗的必要性方面发挥倡导作用。

相似文献

1
Disability: an agenda for bioethics.残疾:生物伦理学议程。
Am J Bioeth. 2001 Summer;1(3):36-44. doi: 10.1162/152651601750418026.
2
Disability: societal responses to difference and interdisciplinary interventions by bioethicists.残疾:社会对差异的反应以及生物伦理学家的跨学科干预措施。
Am J Bioeth. 2001 Summer;1(3):62-3. doi: 10.1162/152651601750418152.
3
Disability and bioethics: removing barriers to understanding and setting the agenda for a new conversation.残疾与生物伦理学:消除理解障碍并为新对话设定议程。
Am J Bioeth. 2001 Summer;1(3):64-5. doi: 10.1162/152651601750418161.
4
Some reflections on disability and bioethics.关于残疾与生物伦理学的一些思考。
Am J Bioeth. 2001 Summer;1(3):51-2. doi: 10.1162/152651601750418080.
5
Disability matters: differences and rights.残疾问题:差异与权利。
Am J Bioeth. 2001 Summer;1(3):53-4. doi: 10.1162/152651601750418099.
6
Bioethics and disability: what's health got to do with it?生物伦理学与残疾:健康与之有何关系?
Am J Bioeth. 2001 Summer;1(3):59-60. doi: 10.1162/152651601750418134.
7
A neutral ethical framework for understanding the role of disability in the life cycle.一个用于理解残疾在生命周期中作用的中立伦理框架。
Am J Bioeth. 2001 Summer;1(3):57-8. doi: 10.1162/152651601750418125.
8
On the development of teachers of medical ethics in China.论中国医学伦理学教师队伍的发展
Hastings Cent Rep. 2000 Jul-Aug;30(4 Suppl):S37-40.
9
The concept of disability in bioethics: theoretical and clinical issues.生物伦理学中的残疾概念:理论与临床问题。
Am J Bioeth. 2001 Summer;1(3):46-8. doi: 10.1162/152651601750418044.
10
Philosophy as news: bioethics, journalism and public policy.作为新闻的哲学:生物伦理学、新闻学与公共政策
J Med Philos. 1999 Apr;24(2):181-200. doi: 10.1076/jmep.24.2.181.2533.

引用本文的文献

1
Into the "New Normal": The Ethical and Analytical Challenge Facing Public Health Post-COVID-19.步入“新常态”:后 COVID-19 时代公共卫生面临的伦理和分析挑战。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 8;19(14):8385. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148385.
2
Introduction: Childhood and Disability.引言:童年与残疾
HEC Forum. 2017 Sep;29(3):191-196. doi: 10.1007/s10730-017-9330-7.
3
Naturalism and the social model of disability: allied or antithetical?自然主义与残疾的社会模型:盟友还是对立?
J Med Ethics. 2015 Jul;41(7):553-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102127. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
4
Research ethics and intellectual disability: broadening the debates.研究伦理与智力障碍:拓展相关辩论
Yale J Biol Med. 2013 Sep 20;86(3):303-14. eCollection 2013 Sep.
5
The ethicist as language czar, or cop: "end of life" v. "ending life".伦理学家作为语言独裁者或警察:“生命终结”与“结束生命”。
HEC Forum. 2013 Dec;25(4):345-59. doi: 10.1007/s10730-013-9215-3.
6
Just regionalisation: rehabilitating care for people with disabilities and chronic illnesses.仅仅是区域化:恢复对残疾人和慢性病患者的护理。
BMC Med Ethics. 2006 Aug 29;7:E9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-7-9.
7
On the possibility and desirability of constructing a neutral conception of disability.关于构建残疾中立概念的可能性与可取性
Theor Med Bioeth. 2003;24(6):471-87. doi: 10.1023/b:meta.0000006924.82156.5b.