Sheikh Rafiq A, Romano Patrick S, Prindiville Thomas P, Yasmeen Shagufta, Trudeau Walter
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002 May-Jun;34(5):529-32. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200205000-00009.
Ticlopidine is a novel antiplatelet agent used alone or in combination with aspirin and anticoagulants in the treatment and prevention of various vascular diseases. Gastrointestinal side effects, including bleeding, have been reported with use of ticlopidine in most of the vascular prevention trials. We studied the endoscopic evidence of mucosal damage in patients taking ticlopidine compared with patients taking aspirin/nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and matched controls.
We performed a longitudinal review of gastrointestinal endoscopy, pharmacy databases, and medical records of patients referred to our service over a period of 6 months for endoscopic evaluation of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, unexplained anemia, or abdominal pain. Data were collected and analyzed for 55 patients taking ticlopidine, 77 age- and gender-matched patients taking aspirin or NSAIDs, and 560 age- and gender-matched control patients not taking any of these medications.
The overall prevalence of ulcers was marginally higher in the aspirin/NSAID group than in the ticlopidine group (35% vs. 29%) and was significantly higher among patients taking aspirin, NSAIDs, or ticlopidine than among controls (15%). Gastritis was also noted more frequently in the aspirin/NSAID and ticlopidine groups than in the control group. Endoscopic evidence of esophagitis was significantly more frequent in the control group than in the aspirin/NSAID and ticlopidine groups. There was no significant difference across groups in the prevalence of ulcers, gastritis, or esophagitis.
Patients taking ticlopidine are more likely to have endoscopic evidence of mucosal damage than matched control patients and are nearly as likely to have such damage as endoscopically evaluated patients taking aspirin or NSAIDs. However, these findings must be confirmed using prospective cohort data for patients in primary care settings, to avoid referral bias.
噻氯匹定是一种新型抗血小板药物,可单独使用或与阿司匹林及抗凝剂联合用于治疗和预防各种血管疾病。在大多数血管预防试验中,使用噻氯匹定后均有胃肠道副作用的报道,包括出血。我们研究了服用噻氯匹定的患者与服用阿司匹林/非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的患者及配对对照者相比,黏膜损伤的内镜证据。
我们对6个月内转诊至我院接受上消化道出血、不明原因贫血或腹痛内镜评估的患者的胃肠道内镜检查、药房数据库和病历进行了纵向回顾。收集并分析了55例服用噻氯匹定的患者、77例年龄和性别匹配的服用阿司匹林或NSAIDs的患者以及560例年龄和性别匹配的未服用上述任何药物的对照患者的数据。
阿司匹林/NSAID组溃疡的总体患病率略高于噻氯匹定组(35%对29%),服用阿司匹林、NSAIDs或噻氯匹定的患者溃疡患病率显著高于对照组(15%)。阿司匹林/NSAID组和噻氯匹定组胃炎的发生率也高于对照组。食管炎的内镜证据在对照组中比在阿司匹林/NSAID组和噻氯匹定组中更常见。溃疡、胃炎或食管炎的患病率在各组之间无显著差异。
与配对的对照患者相比,服用噻氯匹定的患者更有可能在内镜检查中有黏膜损伤的证据,且与接受内镜评估的服用阿司匹林或NSAIDs的患者发生此类损伤的可能性相近。然而,必须使用初级保健机构患者的前瞻性队列数据来证实这些发现,以避免转诊偏倚。