Veelen M A, Meijer D W, Goossens R H M, Snijders C J, Jakimowicz J J
Faculty of Design, Engineering, and Production, Subfaculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 9, 2628 BX, Delft, The Netherlands.
Surg Endosc. 2002 Jan;16(1):201-7. doi: 10.1007/s004640090102. Epub 2001 Nov 12.
Recent studies have shown that the shape of most instrument handles causes user discomfort and that none of the handles currently available on the market satisfies all ergonomic criteria. Therefore, we designed a handle with improved usability; i.e., it is easier to manipulate and its use entails less risk of injury for the operator. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that the intended improvements of the new design were successful.
Six handles representative of the types that are currently available were compared with the new version. Eight surgeons used the seven handles during a precision task and a rough task in a pelvi-trainer. A questionnaire and video analyses were used to assess the usability of the handles.
Based on the responses to the questionnaire, we determined that there were significant differences between the new handle and the Aesculap handle (means of rotation and angle between handle and shaft). No significant differences were found between the new handle and the five other handles. The video analyses (documenting extreme vs neutral wrist excursions) showed significant differences between the new handle and the six other handles.
Compared to the six existing handles, the new handle has significantly improved usability; in particular, its hinged design obviates the need to make extreme wrist excursions.
近期研究表明,大多数器械手柄的形状会导致使用者不适,且目前市场上现有的手柄均未满足所有人体工程学标准。因此,我们设计了一种具有更高可用性的手柄;也就是说,它更易于操作,并且其使用对操作者造成伤害的风险更低。本研究的目的是证明新设计的预期改进是成功的。
将六种代表当前可用类型的手柄与新版本进行比较。八名外科医生在骨盆训练器上进行精确任务和粗略任务时使用这七种手柄。通过问卷调查和视频分析来评估手柄的可用性。
根据问卷调查的回复,我们确定新手柄与蛇牌手柄(手柄旋转及手柄与杆身之间角度的平均值)之间存在显著差异。新手柄与其他五种手柄之间未发现显著差异。视频分析(记录极端与中立手腕偏移)显示新手柄与其他六种手柄之间存在显著差异。
与六种现有手柄相比,新手柄的可用性有显著提高;特别是,其铰接设计无需进行极端的手腕偏移。