• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2型糖尿病患者与心肌梗死患者心血管风险的比较:横断面研究与队列研究

Comparison of cardiovascular risk between patients with type 2 diabetes and those who had had a myocardial infarction: cross sectional and cohort studies.

作者信息

Evans Josie M M, Wang Jixian, Morris Andrew D

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee DD1 9SY.

出版信息

BMJ. 2002 Apr 20;324(7343):939-42. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7343.939.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.324.7343.939
PMID:11964337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC102325/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare risks of cardiovascular outcomes between patients with type 2 diabetes and patients with established coronary heart disease.

DESIGN

Cross sectional study and cohort study using routinely collected datasets.

SETTING

Tayside, Scotland (population 400 000) during 1988-95.

SUBJECTS

In the cross sectional study, among patients aged 45-64, 1155 with type 2 diabetes were compared with 1347 who had had a myocardial infarction in the preceding 8 years. In the cohort study 3477 patients of all ages with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes were compared with 7414 patients who had just had a myocardial infarction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Risk ratios for death from all causes, cardiovascular death, and hospital admission for myocardial infarction were calculated by Cox proportional hazards analysis and adjusted for age and sex.

RESULTS

In the cross sectional study the adjusted risk ratio for death from all causes for patients who had myocardial infarction compared with those with diabetes was 1.33 (95% confidence interval 1.14 to 1.55) [corrected], and the risk ratio for hospital admission for myocardial infarction was 2.27 (1.82 to 2.83) [corrected]. In the cohort study, patients who had just had a myocardial infarction had a higher risk of death from all causes (adjusted risk ratio 1.35 (1.25 to 1.44)), cardiovascular death (2.93 (2.54 to 3.41)), and hospital admission for myocardial infarction (3.10 (2.57 to 3.73)).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with type 2 diabetes were at lower risk of cardiovascular outcomes than patients with established coronary heart disease.

摘要

目的

比较2型糖尿病患者与已确诊冠心病患者发生心血管疾病的风险。

设计

采用常规收集数据集的横断面研究和队列研究。

地点

1988 - 1995年期间,苏格兰泰赛德地区(人口40万)。

研究对象

在横断面研究中,对年龄在45 - 64岁的1155例2型糖尿病患者与前8年内发生过心肌梗死的1347例患者进行比较。在队列研究中,将3477例各年龄段新诊断的2型糖尿病患者与7414例刚发生心肌梗死的患者进行比较。

主要观察指标

通过Cox比例风险分析计算全因死亡、心血管死亡以及因心肌梗死住院的风险比,并对年龄和性别进行校正。

结果

在横断面研究中,心肌梗死患者与糖尿病患者相比,校正后的全因死亡风险比为1.33(95%置信区间1.14至1.55)[校正后],因心肌梗死住院的风险比为2.27(1.82至2.83)[校正后]。在队列研究中,刚发生心肌梗死的患者全因死亡风险更高(校正风险比1.35(1.25至1.44)),心血管死亡风险更高(2.93(2.54至3.41)),因心肌梗死住院风险更高(3.10(2.57至3.73))。

结论

2型糖尿病患者发生心血管疾病的风险低于已确诊冠心病的患者。

相似文献

1
Comparison of cardiovascular risk between patients with type 2 diabetes and those who had had a myocardial infarction: cross sectional and cohort studies.2型糖尿病患者与心肌梗死患者心血管风险的比较:横断面研究与队列研究
BMJ. 2002 Apr 20;324(7343):939-42. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7343.939.
2
Use of the waist-to-height ratio to predict cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes: Results from the ADVANCE-ON study.利用腰高比预测糖尿病患者的心血管风险:来自 ADVANCE-ON 研究的结果。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Aug;20(8):1903-1910. doi: 10.1111/dom.13311. Epub 2018 May 6.
3
Diabetes patients requiring glucose-lowering therapy and nondiabetics with a prior myocardial infarction carry the same cardiovascular risk: a population study of 3.3 million people.需要降糖治疗的糖尿病患者与既往有心肌梗死的非糖尿病患者具有相同的心血管风险:一项对330万人的人群研究。
Circulation. 2008 Apr 15;117(15):1945-54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.720847. Epub 2008 Mar 31.
4
Prognosis following first acute myocardial infarction in Type 2 diabetes: a comparative population study.2型糖尿病患者首次急性心肌梗死后的预后:一项比较性人群研究。
Diabet Med. 2002 Jun;19(6):448-55. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00711.x.
5
A 12-year follow-up study of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among 10,532 people newly diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes in Tayside, Scotland.一项针对苏格兰泰赛德地区新诊断为 2 型糖尿病的 10532 人全因和心血管死亡率的 12 年随访研究。
Diabet Med. 2010 Oct;27(10):1124-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03075.x.
6
Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction.2型糖尿病患者以及有和没有既往心肌梗死的非糖尿病患者的冠心病死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 23;339(4):229-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199807233390404.
7
Hyperglycemia and compositional lipoprotein abnormalities as predictors of cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes: a 15-year follow-up from the time of diagnosis.高血糖和脂蛋白成分异常作为2型糖尿病患者心血管死亡的预测因素:自诊断起15年随访研究
Diabetes Care. 1998 Nov;21(11):1861-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.11.1861.
8
The effect of radial pulse spectrum on the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes.桡动脉脉搏波频谱对 2 型糖尿病患者发生主要不良心血管事件风险的影响。
J Diabetes Complications. 2019 Feb;33(2):160-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
9
Risk of mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a comparison of patients treated with sulfonylureas and metformin.2型糖尿病患者的死亡风险及不良心血管结局:磺脲类药物与二甲双胍治疗患者的比较
Diabetologia. 2006 May;49(5):930-6. doi: 10.1007/s00125-006-0176-9. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
10
Prognostic implications of hypoglycaemic episodes during hospitalisation for myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes: a report from the DIGAMI 2 trial.2型糖尿病患者心肌梗死住院期间低血糖发作的预后意义:DIGAMI 2试验报告
Heart. 2009 May;95(9):721-7. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.152835. Epub 2008 Nov 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of insulin induced lipohypertrophy on carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.胰岛素诱导的脂肪肥厚对 2 型糖尿病患者颈动脉内膜中层厚度的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 29;102(39):e34696. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034696.
2
Associations between Inflammation, Hemoglobin Levels, and Coronary Artery Disease in Non-Albuminuric Subjects with and without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.非白蛋白尿的 2 型糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者炎症、血红蛋白水平与冠状动脉疾病的相关性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Sep 15;24(18):14131. doi: 10.3390/ijms241814131.
3
Risk Factors, Use of Preventive Drugs, and Cardiovascular Events in Diabetes Mellitus: The PURE Türkiye Cohort.糖尿病患者的心血管疾病风险因素、预防药物使用与心血管事件:PURE 土耳其队列研究。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2023 Aug 1;27(8):453-461. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2023.3465. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
4
Role of insulin action in the pathogenesis of diabetic complications.胰岛素作用在糖尿病并发症发病机制中的作用。
Diabetol Int. 2022 Sep 7;13(4):591-598. doi: 10.1007/s13340-022-00601-1. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Predictive Value of the Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP) for the Risk of Incident Ischemic Heart Disease among Non-Diabetic Koreans.血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数(AIP)对非糖尿病韩国人群新发缺血性心脏病风险的预测价值。
Nutrients. 2021 Sep 16;13(9):3231. doi: 10.3390/nu13093231.
6
The Metabolic Score for Insulin Resistance (METS-IR) as a Predictor of Incident Ischemic Heart Disease: A Longitudinal Study among Korean without Diabetes.胰岛素抵抗代谢评分(METS-IR)作为缺血性心脏病发病的预测指标:一项针对无糖尿病韩国人的纵向研究。
J Pers Med. 2021 Jul 28;11(8):742. doi: 10.3390/jpm11080742.
7
The triglyceride-glucose index predicts ischemic heart disease risk in Koreans: a prospective study using National Health Insurance Service data.甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数预测韩国人缺血性心脏病风险:基于国民健康保险服务数据的前瞻性研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Dec 10;19(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01186-2.
8
Coronary Artery Calcium Score Predicts Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes in Asymptomatic Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.冠状动脉钙评分可预测 2 型糖尿病无症状患者的长期心血管结局。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2021 Oct 1;28(10):1052-1062. doi: 10.5551/jat.59386. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
9
Diabetes is not a risk factor for myocardial infarction in patients without coronary artery disease: A study from the Western Denmark Heart Registry.在没有冠状动脉疾病的患者中,糖尿病不是心肌梗死的危险因素:来自丹麦西部心脏登记研究。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2020 Jul-Aug;17(4):1479164120941809. doi: 10.1177/1479164120941809.
10
Association of Factor V Leiden With Subsequent Atherothrombotic Events: A GENIUS-CHD Study of Individual Participant Data.因子 V Leiden 与随后的动脉粥样血栓事件的关联:个体参与者数据的 GENIUS-CHD 研究。
Circulation. 2020 Aug 11;142(6):546-555. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.045526. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

本文引用的文献

1
A study to determine the sensitivity and specificity of hospital discharge diagnosis data used in the MICA study.一项确定MICA研究中所使用的医院出院诊断数据的敏感性和特异性的研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 1998 Sep;7(5):311-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1557(199809/10)7:5<311::AID-PDS371>3.0.CO;2-O.
2
Cardiovascular disease and risk factors in persons with type 2 diabetes diagnosed in a large population screening: the Nord-Trøndelag Diabetes Study, Norway.
J Intern Med. 2000 Dec;248(6):492-500. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2000.00759.x.
3
Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study.血糖水平与2型糖尿病大血管及微血管并发症的关联(英国前瞻性糖尿病研究35):前瞻性观察研究
BMJ. 2000 Aug 12;321(7258):405-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405.
4
Diabetes care needs evidence based interventions to reduce risk of vascular disease.糖尿病护理需要基于证据的干预措施来降低血管疾病的风险。
BMJ. 2000 Jun 10;320(7249):1554-5.
5
Diabetes and coronary heart disease.糖尿病与冠心病。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 3;339(23):1714-5; author reply 1716. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812033392314.
6
Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction.2型糖尿病患者以及有和没有既往心肌梗死的非糖尿病患者的冠心病死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 23;339(4):229-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199807233390404.
7
The diabetes audit and research in Tayside Scotland (DARTS) study: electronic record linkage to create a diabetes register. DARTS/MEMO Collaboration.苏格兰泰赛德地区糖尿病审计与研究(DARTS)研究:通过电子记录链接创建糖尿病登记册。DARTS/MEMO合作团队。
BMJ. 1997 Aug 30;315(7107):524-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7107.524.
8
Country profile: Sweden.
Lancet. 1996 Mar 2;347(9001):587-94. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91278-7.
9
Diabetes, other risk factors, and 12-yr cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.在多重危险因素干预试验中接受筛查的男性的糖尿病、其他危险因素及12年心血管死亡率
Diabetes Care. 1993 Feb;16(2):434-44. doi: 10.2337/diacare.16.2.434.