Banks D E
Louisiana State University, Shreveport, Louisiana 71130-3932, USA.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Apr;1(2):163-8. doi: 10.1097/01.all.0000011002.72912.c8.
The recognition that irritant exposures can cause asthma is not new. Many investigators turn towards the gassings of soldiers in World War I as the first examples of this, while Brooks, in 1985, reported this in detail in workers and called it 'Reactive Airways Dysfunction Syndrome (RADS)'. There is considerable overlap with RADS and occupational asthma as both share respiratory symptoms which can be described as 'asthmatic', yet RADS is the result of an acute excessive exposure, while occupational asthma occurs due to a series of sensitizing exposures. Yet, a clear understanding of RADS has been limited by the lack of epidemiologic studies; rather the disease has been described by case series. This report contrasts RADS and occupational asthma and finds that although there may be some difference in lung pathology, reports for the past years since Brooks' initial reports have shown that the line separating occupational asthma and RADS has become increasingly blurred, rather than increasingly distinct, with considerable overlap in the clinical symptoms with the perspective that these described entities are a part of a continuum. Perhaps the development of animal models for RADS may hasten further understanding.
认识到刺激性物质暴露可导致哮喘并非新鲜事。许多研究者将第一次世界大战中士兵遭受的毒气攻击视为这方面的首个例子,而布鲁克斯在1985年详细报道了工人中的此类情况,并将其称为“反应性气道功能障碍综合征(RADS)”。RADS与职业性哮喘有相当多的重叠之处,因为两者都有可被描述为“哮喘性”的呼吸道症状,但RADS是急性过度暴露的结果,而职业性哮喘是由于一系列致敏性暴露所致。然而,由于缺乏流行病学研究,对RADS的清晰认识受到限制;相反,该病是通过病例系列来描述的。本报告对比了RADS和职业性哮喘,发现尽管肺部病理学可能存在一些差异,但自布鲁克斯最初报告以来的过去几年的报告显示,区分职业性哮喘和RADS的界限变得越来越模糊,而非越来越清晰,临床症状有相当多的重叠,从这些描述的实体是一个连续统一体的角度来看。也许RADS动物模型的开发可能会加速进一步的理解。