• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健领域提供者支付系统的一种类型学。

A typology for provider payment systems in health care.

作者信息

Jegers Marc, Kesteloot Katrien, De Graeve Diana, Gilles Willem

机构信息

Free University of Brussels (VUB), Micro Economics of the Profit and Non Profit Sectors, Pleinlaan 2, Belgium.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2002 Jun;60(3):255-73. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(01)00216-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0168-8510(01)00216-0
PMID:11965334
Abstract

A typology to classify provider payment systems from an incentive point of view is developed. We analyse the way, how these systems can influence provider behaviour and, a fortiori, contribute to attain the general objectives of health care, i.e. quality of care, efficiency and accessibility. The first dimension of the typology indicates whether there is a link between the provider's income and his activity. In variable systems, the provider has an ability to influence his earnings, contrary to fixed systems. The second dimension indicates whether the provider's payments are related to his actual costs or not. In retrospective systems, the provider's own costs are the basis for reimbursement ex post whereas in prospective systems payments are determined ex ante without any link to the real costs of the individual provider. These different characteristics are likely to influence provider behaviour in different ways. Furthermore the most frequently used criteria to determine the provider's income are discussed: per service, per diem, per case, per patient and per period. Also a distinction is made between incentives at the level of the individual provider (micro-level) and the sponsor (macro-level). Finally, the potential interactions when several payment systems are used simultaneously are discussed. This typology is useful to classify and compare different types of payment systems as prevailing in different countries, and provides a useful framework for future research of health care payment systems.

摘要

本文构建了一种从激励角度对医疗服务提供者支付系统进行分类的类型学。我们分析了这些系统影响提供者行为的方式,进而有助于实现医疗保健的总体目标,即医疗质量、效率和可及性。该类型学的第一个维度表明提供者的收入与他的活动之间是否存在联系。与固定系统不同,在可变系统中,提供者有能力影响其收入。第二个维度表明提供者的支付是否与其实际成本相关。在追溯系统中,提供者自身的成本是事后报销的基础,而在前瞻系统中,支付是事前确定的,与单个提供者的实际成本没有任何联系。这些不同的特征可能会以不同的方式影响提供者的行为。此外,还讨论了确定提供者收入最常用的标准:按服务、按日、按病例、按患者和按时期。同时,还区分了个体提供者层面(微观层面)和资助者层面(宏观层面)的激励措施。最后,讨论了同时使用多种支付系统时的潜在相互作用。这种类型学有助于对不同国家普遍存在的不同类型的支付系统进行分类和比较,并为未来医疗保健支付系统的研究提供了一个有用的框架。

相似文献

1
A typology for provider payment systems in health care.医疗保健领域提供者支付系统的一种类型学。
Health Policy. 2002 Jun;60(3):255-73. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(01)00216-0.
2
Towards incentivising integration: A typology of payments for integrated care.迈向激励整合:整合护理支付的分类法。
Health Policy. 2018 Sep;122(9):963-969. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
3
The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.经济激励措施对初级保健医生所提供医疗服务质量的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7(9):CD008451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008451.pub2.
4
Advancing the application of systems thinking in health: provider payment and service supply behaviour and incentives in the Ghana National Health Insurance Scheme--a systems approach.推进系统思维在卫生领域的应用:加纳国家健康保险计划中的提供者支付、服务供应行为及激励措施——一种系统方法
Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Aug 5;12:35. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-35.
5
Hospital financing in Belgium: recent changes and future options.比利时的医院融资:近期变化与未来选择。
Health Policy. 1986;6(4):353-61. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(86)90050-3.
6
A Cost Reimbursement Model for Hepatitis C Treatment Care Coordination.丙型肝炎治疗护理协调的成本补偿模式。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2019 May/Jun;25(3):253-261. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000806.
7
Incentives and financing methods.激励措施与融资方式。
Health Policy. 1995 Dec;34(3):205-20. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(95)00759-8.
8
Cream-skimming, incentives for efficiency and payment system.撇脂、效率激励与支付系统。
J Health Econ. 2003 May;22(3):419-43. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00119-4.
9
Addressing government and market failures with payment incentives: Hospital reimbursement reform in Hainan, China.利用支付激励措施应对政府和市场失灵:中国海南的医院报销改革
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jan;58(2):267-77. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00010-8.
10
What characteristics of provider payment mechanisms influence health care providers' behaviour? A literature review.医疗服务提供者支付机制的哪些特征会影响医疗服务提供者的行为?一项文献综述。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 Oct;33(4):e892-e905. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2565. Epub 2018 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Telemedicine Public Reimbursement Models for National and Subnational Jurisdictions: Scoping Review.国家和次国家辖区的远程医疗公共报销模式:范围审查
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 12;27:e75478. doi: 10.2196/75478.
2
Community participation and contracting between state and non-state actors in primary care: A scoping review of evidence.初级保健中社区参与以及国家与非国家行为体之间的签约:证据的范围审查
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jul 9;24(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02567-3.
3
Economic evaluation of inpatient medication reconciliation with a subtraction strategy.
采用减法策略对住院患者用药核对进行的经济学评估。
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Jun 21;15(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00649-0.
4
Impact of an innovative case-based payment reform on hospital cost variation: insights from cerebral infarction inpatients in China.一项创新性病例付费改革对医院成本差异的影响:来自中国脑梗死住院患者的见解
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Mar 19;24(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02447-w.
5
Contracting with sequential care providers.与连续护理提供者签约。
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Dec 19;14(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00572-w.
6
Alternative payment models in Dutch hospital care: what works, how, why and under what circumstances? Protocol for a realist evaluation study.荷兰医院护理中的替代支付模式:什么有效、如何有效、为什么有效以及在什么情况下有效?一项现实主义评价研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 23;14(9):e082372. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082372.
7
Effect of capitation payment method on health outcomes, healthcare utilization, and referrals in Ghana.人头付费方式对加纳健康结果、医疗保健利用及转诊的影响。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jun 21;4(6):e0002423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002423. eCollection 2024.
8
The impact of an innovative payment method on medical expenditure, efficiency, and quality for inpatients with different types of medical insurance: evidence from a pilot city, China.创新支付方式对不同医保类型住院患者医疗支出、效率和质量的影响:来自中国试点城市的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Jun 5;23(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02196-2.
9
Regaining policy attention for a health insurance capitation payment reform in Ghana: A prospective policy analysis.重新唤起加纳医疗保险按人头付费改革的政策关注:一项前瞻性政策分析。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 May 30;4(5):e0003265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003265. eCollection 2024.
10
Evaluation of the impact of prospective payment systems on cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.前瞻性支付系统对胆囊切除术影响的评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2024 Aug 31;28(3):291-301. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.24-038. Epub 2024 May 7.