• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于APACHE II和SAPS II评分的ICU住院时间延长患者定制预测模型。

Customized prediction models based on APACHE II and SAPS II scores in patients with prolonged length of stay in the ICU.

作者信息

Suistomaa M, Niskanen M, Kari A, Hynynen M, Takala J

机构信息

Mikkeli Central Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2002 Apr;28(4):479-85. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1214-9. Epub 2002 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00134-002-1214-9
PMID:11967604
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study customized APACHE II and SAPS II models in predicting hospital death in patients with a prolonged length of stay in the ICU.

DESIGN

Prospectively collected database.

SETTING

Thirteen ICUs with 5-10 beds in Finnish secondary referral hospitals.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The database was collected between 1994 and 1999 and included 23,953 ICU admissions. In order to customize the original APACHE II and SAPS II models and to validate the models, the database was randomly divided into customization data ( n=12,064) and into validation data ( n=11,889). Logistic regression analysis was used for customization. As the length of the ICU stay was prolonged, the calibration and discrimination of both customized models worsened gradually in the validation data. Patients whose ICU stay lasted 7 days or longer (1,312 patients) consumed more than one half of all ICU days and TISS-points. Among these patients, goodness-of-fit statistics was 221.5 and 306.3 ( P<0.0001 for both) and the areas under ROC curve 0.65 and 0.62 for the customized APACHE and SAPS models, respectively. The models underestimated the risk of death in the low range and overestimated it in the high range of predicted mortality. On the other hand, both models discriminated well between survivors and non-survivors if the ICU stay was 2 days or less.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite customization, the predictive models may not support clinical decision-making in those patients who require a high share of resources. More relevant instruments are needed for the prediction of outcome of patient groups who consume the major part of ICU resources.

摘要

目的

研究定制的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(APACHE II)和简化急性生理学评分系统Ⅱ(SAPS II)模型对入住重症监护病房(ICU)时间延长患者的医院死亡预测情况。

设计

前瞻性收集数据库。

地点

芬兰二级转诊医院中13个拥有5至10张床位的ICU。

干预措施

无。

测量与结果

数据库收集时间为1994年至1999年,包括23953例ICU入院病例。为了定制原始的APACHE II和SAPS II模型并验证这些模型,数据库被随机分为定制数据(n = 12064)和验证数据(n = 11889)。采用逻辑回归分析进行定制。随着ICU住院时间延长,在验证数据中,两种定制模型的校准和区分度逐渐变差。ICU住院时间持续7天或更长时间的患者(1312例患者)消耗了所有ICU住院天数和治疗干预评分系统(TISS)分数的一半以上。在这些患者中,定制的APACHE和SAPS模型的拟合优度统计量分别为221.5和306.3(两者P均<0.0001),ROC曲线下面积分别为0.65和0.62。模型在预测死亡率低范围时低估死亡风险,在高范围时高估死亡风险。另一方面,如果ICU住院时间为2天或更短,两种模型在区分存活者和非存活者方面表现良好。

结论

尽管进行了定制,但预测模型可能无法为那些需要大量资源的患者提供临床决策支持。对于消耗ICU主要资源的患者群体的预后预测,需要更相关的工具。

相似文献

1
Customized prediction models based on APACHE II and SAPS II scores in patients with prolonged length of stay in the ICU.基于APACHE II和SAPS II评分的ICU住院时间延长患者定制预测模型。
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Apr;28(4):479-85. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1214-9. Epub 2002 Feb 22.
2
Mortality and length-of-stay outcomes, 1993-2003, in the binational Australian and New Zealand intensive care adult patient database.1993年至2003年,澳大利亚和新西兰成人重症监护患者双边数据库中的死亡率和住院时间结果。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):46-61. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000295313.08084.58.
3
Intensive care unit length of stay: Benchmarking based on Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV.重症监护病房住院时长:基于急性生理与慢性健康状况评估系统(APACHE)IV的基准分析
Crit Care Med. 2006 Oct;34(10):2517-29. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000240233.01711.D9.
4
A comparison of APACHE II and SAPS II scoring systems in predicting hospital mortality in Thai adult intensive care units.急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)和简化急性生理学评分系统II(SAPS II)在预测泰国成人重症监护病房患者医院死亡率方面的比较。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Apr;90(4):643-52.
5
The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation III outcome prediction in patients admitted to the intensive care unit after pneumonectomy.肺切除术后入住重症监护病房患者的急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估III结局预测
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Dec;21(6):832-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2006.12.005. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
6
Prediction of mortality by using the standard scoring systems in a medical intensive care unit in Thailand.在泰国一家医疗重症监护病房中使用标准评分系统预测死亡率。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Jul;88(7):949-55.
7
[Intensive care medicine in the Netherlands, 1997-2001. I. Patient population and treatment outcome].[荷兰的重症医学,1997 - 2001年。一、患者群体与治疗结果]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 May 24;147(21):1013-7.
8
The outcome of acute renal failure in the intensive care unit according to RIFLE: model application, sensitivity, and predictability.根据RIFLE标准评估重症监护病房中急性肾衰竭的预后:模型应用、敏感性及可预测性
Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Dec;46(6):1038-48. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.08.033.
9
[Intensity of treatment and severity of illness in the intensive care unit (ICU)].[重症监护病房(ICU)的治疗强度与疾病严重程度]
Minerva Anestesiol. 1997 Oct;63(10):321-6.
10
[Comparing the performance of three severity scoring systems for ICU patients: APACHE III, SAPS II, MPM II].[比较三种重症监护病房患者严重程度评分系统的性能:急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅲ(APACHE III)、简化急性生理学评分系统Ⅱ(SAPS II)、死亡率预测模型Ⅱ(MPM II)]
J Prev Med Public Health. 2005 Aug;38(3):276-82.

引用本文的文献

1
Integration of Metabolomic and Clinical Data Improves the Prediction of Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay Following Major Traumatic Injury.代谢组学与临床数据的整合改善了严重创伤后重症监护病房住院时间的预测。
Metabolites. 2021 Dec 31;12(1):29. doi: 10.3390/metabo12010029.
2
An attention based deep learning model of clinical events in the intensive care unit.基于注意力的重症监护室临床事件深度学习模型。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 13;14(2):e0211057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211057. eCollection 2019.
3
PICU Length of Stay: Factors Associated With Bed Utilization and Development of a Benchmarking Model.
PICU 住院时间:与床位利用相关的因素及建立基准模型。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Mar;19(3):196-203. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001425.
4
Predictive Performance of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II and the Initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score in Acutely Ill Intensive Care Patients: Post-Hoc Analyses of the SUP-ICU Inception Cohort Study.简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)II和初始序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分对急重症监护患者的预测性能:SUP-ICU初始队列研究的事后分析
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 22;11(12):e0168948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168948. eCollection 2016.
5
Multivariable fractional polynomial interaction to investigate continuous effect modifiers in a meta-analysis on higher versus lower PEEP for patients with ARDS.多变量分数多项式相互作用分析在 ARDS 患者高 PEEP 与低 PEEP 比较的荟萃分析中对连续效应修饰因素的研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 8;6(9):e011148. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011148.
6
Feasibility of transitioning from APACHE II to SAPS III as prognostic model in a Brazilian general intensive care unit. A retrospective study.在巴西一家综合重症监护病房中,从急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)转换为简化急性生理学评分系统III(SAPS III)作为预后模型的可行性。一项回顾性研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2015 May-Jun;133(3):199-205. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2013.8120014. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
7
Investigation of continuous effect modifiers in a meta-analysis on higher versus lower PEEP in patients requiring mechanical ventilation--protocol of the ICEM study.在机械通气患者中比较高呼气末正压与低呼气末正压的荟萃分析中连续效应修饰因素的研究——ICEM研究方案
Syst Rev. 2014 May 20;3:46. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-46.
8
A calibration study of SAPS II with Norwegian intensive care registry data.一项利用挪威重症监护登记数据对简化急性生理学评分系统II(SAPS II)进行的校准研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Jul;58(6):701-8. doi: 10.1111/aas.12327. Epub 2014 May 12.
9
Usefulness of a clinical diagnosis of ICU-acquired paresis to predict outcome in patients with SIRS and acute respiratory failure.ICU 获得性瘫痪的临床诊断对 SIRS 和急性呼吸衰竭患者预后的预测价值。
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jan;36(1):66-74. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1645-7. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
10
A simple method to adjust clinical prediction models to local circumstances.一种将临床预测模型调整至适用于当地情况的简单方法。
Can J Anaesth. 2009 Mar;56(3):194-201. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9041-x. Epub 2009 Feb 7.