Suppr超能文献

在原发性高血压患者中,使用AT(1)受体拮抗剂氯沙坦治疗可降低阻力动脉僵硬度。

Reduction of resistance artery stiffness by treatment with the AT(1)-receptor antagonist losartan in essential hypertension.

作者信息

Park J B, Intengan H D, Schiffrin E L

机构信息

Multidisciplinary Research Group on Hypertension, Clinical Research Institute of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1R7, Canada.

出版信息

J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2000 Mar;1(1):40-5. doi: 10.3317/jraas.2000.009.

Abstract

In spontaneously hypertensive rats resistance artery structure, endothelial dysfunction and geometry-independent wall stiffness were reduced by an angiotensin AT(1)-receptor antagonist. In previous studies of human hypertension, interruption of the renin-angiotensin system corrected small artery structure and endothelial dysfunction, whereas the beta-blocker atenolol did not. We hypothesized that the AT(1)R antagonist losartan, but not the beta-blocker atenolol, would reduce stiffness of gluteal subcutaneous small arteries in essential hypertensive patients. Seventeen untreated mild essential hypertensive patients (47+/-2 years; 75% male) were randomly assigned in double-blind fashion to losartan or atenolol treatment for one year. Small, resistance size arteries were studied on pressurized myographs. Blood pressure (mmHg) was reduced (p<0.01) from 145 +/- 4/101 +/- 2 and 147 +/- 6/98 +/- 2 to 128 +/- 4/86 +/- 2 and 131 +/- 3/84 +/- 1 by losartan and atenolol, respectively. The media/lumen ratio of small arteries was unaffected by atenolol (8.3+/-0.3% before and 8.8+/-0.5% after treatment). In contrast, losartan reduced media/lumen ratio from 8.4+/-0.4% to 6.7+/-0.3% (p<0.01). Whereas isobaric elastic modulus was unaffected by either treatment, geometry-independent stiffness (slope of elastic modulus vs. stress) was reduced from 9.7+/-1.2 to 6.1+/-0.9 (P<0.05) under losartan treatment, but was unchanged by atenolol (8.2+/-1.3 to 7.8+/-0.6). In conclusion, treatment with losartan reduced stiffness and structural alterations of subcutaneous resistance arteries of previously untreated essential hypertensive patients, whereas atenolol failed to do so.

摘要

在自发性高血压大鼠中,血管紧张素AT(1)受体拮抗剂可降低阻力动脉结构、内皮功能障碍及与几何形状无关的血管壁僵硬度。在先前关于人类高血压的研究中,肾素-血管紧张素系统的阻断纠正了小动脉结构和内皮功能障碍,而β受体阻滞剂阿替洛尔则无此作用。我们假设血管紧张素AT(1)受体拮抗剂氯沙坦可降低原发性高血压患者臀皮下小动脉的僵硬度,而β受体阻滞剂阿替洛尔则不能。17例未经治疗的轻度原发性高血压患者(47±2岁;75%为男性)以双盲方式随机分配接受氯沙坦或阿替洛尔治疗1年。在压力肌动描记仪上研究小的阻力血管。氯沙坦和阿替洛尔分别使血压(mmHg)从145±4/101±2和147±6/98±2降至128±4/86±2和131±3/84±1(p<0.01)。阿替洛尔对小动脉的中膜/管腔比值无影响(治疗前为8.3±0.3%,治疗后为8.8±0.5%)。相比之下,氯沙坦使中膜/管腔比值从8.4±0.4%降至6.7±0.3%(p<0.01)。等压弹性模量不受任何一种治疗的影响,而与几何形状无关的僵硬度(弹性模量与应力曲线的斜率)在氯沙坦治疗下从9.7±1.2降至6.1±0.9(P<0.05),但阿替洛尔治疗后无变化(8.2±1.3至7.8±0.6)。总之,氯沙坦治疗可降低未经治疗的原发性高血压患者皮下阻力动脉的僵硬度和结构改变,而阿替洛尔则未能做到。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验