Roy Jefferson E, Cullen Kathleen E
Aerospace Medical Research Unit, Department of Physiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1Y6, Canada.
J Neurophysiol. 2002 May;87(5):2337-57. doi: 10.1152/jn.2002.87.5.2337.
The vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) effectively stabilizes the visual world on the retina over the wide range of head movements generated during daily activities by producing an eye movement of equal and opposite amplitude to the motion of the head. Although an intact VOR is essential for stabilizing gaze during walking and running, it can be counterproductive during certain voluntary behaviors. For example, primates use rapid coordinated movements of the eyes and head (gaze shifts) to redirect the visual axis from one target of interest to another. During these self-generated head movements, a fully functional VOR would generate an eye-movement command in the direction opposite to that of the intended shift in gaze. Here, we have investigated how the VOR pathways process vestibular information across a wide range of behaviors in which head movements were either externally applied and/or self-generated and in which the gaze goal was systematically varied (i.e., stabilize vs. redirect). VOR interneurons [i.e., type I position-vestibular-pause (PVP) neurons] were characterized during head-restrained passive whole-body rotation, passive head-on-body rotation, active eye-head gaze shifts, active eye-head gaze pursuit, self-generated whole-body motion, and active head-on-body motion made while the monkey was passively rotated. We found that regardless of the stimulation condition, type I PVP neuron responses to head motion were comparable whenever the monkey stabilized its gaze. In contrast, whenever the monkey redirected its gaze, type I PVP neurons were significantly less responsive to head velocity. We also performed a comparable analysis of type II PVP neurons, which are likely to contribute indirectly to the VOR, and found that they generally behaved in a quantitatively similar manner. Thus our findings support the hypothesis that the activity of the VOR pathways is reduced "on-line" whenever the current behavioral goal is to redirect gaze. By characterizing neuronal responses during a variety of experimental conditions, we were also able to determine which inputs contribute to the differential processing of head-velocity information by PVP neurons. We show that neither neck proprioceptive inputs, an efference copy of neck motor commands nor the monkey's knowledge of its self-motion influence the activity of PVP neurons per se. Rather we propose that efference copies of oculomotor/gaze commands are responsible for the behaviorally dependent modulation of PVP neurons (and by extension for modulation of the status of the VOR) during gaze redirection.
前庭眼反射(VOR)通过产生与头部运动幅度相等、方向相反的眼球运动,在日常活动中产生的广泛头部运动范围内,有效地将视觉世界稳定在视网膜上。尽管完整的VOR对于在行走和跑步时稳定注视至关重要,但在某些自主行为中可能会适得其反。例如,灵长类动物利用眼睛和头部的快速协调运动(注视转移)将视轴从一个感兴趣的目标重新定向到另一个目标。在这些自我产生的头部运动过程中,功能完全正常的VOR会产生与预期注视转移方向相反的眼球运动指令。在这里,我们研究了VOR通路如何在广泛的行为中处理前庭信息,这些行为中头部运动要么是外部施加的和/或自我产生的,并且注视目标系统地变化(即稳定与重新定向)。在前庭抑制的被动全身旋转、被动头在身体上的旋转、主动眼-头注视转移、主动眼-头注视追踪、自我产生的全身运动以及猴子被动旋转时进行的主动头在身体上的运动过程中,对VOR中间神经元[即I型位置-前庭-暂停(PVP)神经元]进行了特征描述。我们发现,无论刺激条件如何,只要猴子稳定其注视,I型PVP神经元对头部运动的反应都是可比的。相反,每当猴子重新定向其注视时,I型PVP神经元对头部速度的反应明显降低。我们还对可能间接参与VOR的II型PVP神经元进行了类似的分析,发现它们的行为通常在数量上相似。因此,我们的研究结果支持这样的假设,即每当当前行为目标是重新定向注视时,VOR通路的活动会“在线”降低。通过在各种实验条件下对神经元反应进行特征描述,我们还能够确定哪些输入对PVP神经元对头部速度信息的差异处理有贡献。我们表明,颈部本体感觉输入、颈部运动指令的传出副本以及猴子对自身运动的了解本身都不会影响PVP神经元的活动。相反,我们提出眼动/注视指令的传出副本负责在注视重新定向期间对PVP神经元进行行为依赖型调制(并进而对VOR的状态进行调制)。