• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Patient safety, potential adverse drug events, and medical device design: a human factors engineering approach.

作者信息

Lin L, Vicente K J, Doyle D J

机构信息

Cognitive Engineering Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3G8.

出版信息

J Biomed Inform. 2001 Aug;34(4):274-84. doi: 10.1006/jbin.2001.1028.

DOI:10.1006/jbin.2001.1028
PMID:11977809
Abstract

Adverse drug events are the single leading threat to patient safety. Human factors engineering has been repeatedly proposed, but largely untested, as the key to improving patient safety. The value of this approach was investigated in the context of a commercially available patient-controlled analgesia device that has been linked with several alleged patient injuries and deaths. Several reports have stated that errors in programming drug concentration were made during these adverse drug events. A simulation of the commercially available interface was compared experimentally with a simulated prototype of a new interface designed according to a human factors process. Professional nurses, averaging over 5 years of clinical experience with the commercially available interface and only minimal experience with the new interface, programmed both interfaces. The new interface eliminated drug concentration errors, whereas the simulated commercially available interface did not. Also, the new interface led to significantly fewer total errors and faster performance. These findings may have broad implications for the design, regulation, and procurement of biomedical devices, products, or systems that improve patient safety in clinical settings.

摘要

相似文献

1
Patient safety, potential adverse drug events, and medical device design: a human factors engineering approach.
J Biomed Inform. 2001 Aug;34(4):274-84. doi: 10.1006/jbin.2001.1028.
2
Adolescent use of insulin and patient-controlled analgesia pump technology: a 10-year Food and Drug Administration retrospective study of adverse events.青少年对胰岛素及患者自控镇痛泵技术的使用:美国食品药品监督管理局针对不良事件的10年回顾性研究
Pediatrics. 2008 May;121(5):e1133-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1707.
3
Right medication, right dose, right patient, right time, and right route: how do we select the right patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device?正确的药物、正确的剂量、正确的患者、正确的时间和正确的途径:我们如何选择正确的患者自控镇痛(PCA)设备?
Pain Manag Nurs. 2007 Dec;8(4):140-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2007.08.001.
4
[Development of antituberculous drugs: current status and future prospects].[抗结核药物的研发:现状与未来前景]
Kekkaku. 2006 Dec;81(12):753-74.
5
Impact of a comprehensive safety initiative on patient-controlled analgesia errors.综合安全措施对患者自控镇痛错误的影响。
Anesthesiology. 2010 Dec;113(6):1427-32. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fcb427.
6
Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.转基因植物及其衍生食品和饲料的安全性与营养评估:动物饲养试验的作用
Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
7
Reevaluating the safety profile of pediatrics: a comparison of computerized adverse drug event surveillance and voluntary reporting in the pediatric environment.重新评估儿科用药安全性:儿科环境中计算机化药物不良事件监测与自愿报告的比较。
Pediatrics. 2008 May;121(5):e1201-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2609.
8
Designing the design phase of critical care devices: a cognitive approach.设计重症监护设备的设计阶段:一种认知方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2005 Feb;38(1):34-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.001.
9
Patient-controlled analgesia in chronic pain patients: experience with a new device designed to be used with implanted programmable pumps.慢性疼痛患者的患者自控镇痛:使用一种设计用于与植入式可编程泵配合使用的新设备的经验。
Pain Pract. 2008 May-Jun;8(3):164-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00187.x. Epub 2008 Mar 31.
10
Between choice and chance: the role of human factors in acute care equipment decisions.在选择和机会之间:人为因素在急性护理设备决策中的作用。
J Patient Saf. 2009 Jun;5(2):114-21. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3181a974d9.

引用本文的文献

1
Case study of user experience-driven design in a new local anaesthetic dentistry jet injection device.新型局部麻醉牙科喷射注射器中用户体验驱动设计的案例研究
J R Soc N Z. 2022 Aug 24;54(2):177-189. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2022.2113809. eCollection 2024.
2
A New Full-Face Mask for Multifunctional Non-Invasive Ventilation.一种用于多功能无创通气的全新全脸面罩。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Aug 2;59(8):1410. doi: 10.3390/medicina59081410.
3
Research protocol for the validation of a new portable technology for real-time continuous monitoring of Early Warning Score (EWS) in hospital practice and for an early-stage multistakeholder assessment.
用于实时连续监测医院实践中早期预警评分(EWS)的新型便携式技术的验证以及早期多利益相关者评估的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 3;10(12):e040738. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040738.
4
Development of a Clinical Interface for a Novel Newborn Resuscitation Device: Human Factors Approach to Understanding Cognitive User Requirements.新型新生儿复苏设备临床接口的开发:基于人因工程学方法理解认知用户需求
JMIR Hum Factors. 2019 Jun 8;6(2):e12055. doi: 10.2196/12055.
5
Review of technologies available to improve hand hygiene compliance - are they fit for purpose?改善手部卫生依从性的可用技术综述——它们是否适用?
J Infect Prev. 2014 Nov;15(6):222-228. doi: 10.1177/1757177414548695. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
6
The usability of ventilators: a comparative evaluation of use safety and user experience.呼吸机的可用性:使用安全性和用户体验的比较评估。
Crit Care. 2016 Aug 20;20:263. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1431-1.
7
An Evaluation of the Effects of Human Factors and Ergonomics on Health Care and Patient Safety Practices: A Systematic Review.人为因素与工效学对医疗保健及患者安全实践的影响评估:一项系统综述
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 12;10(6):e0129948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129948. eCollection 2015.
8
A systematic review of human factors and ergonomics (HFE)-based healthcare system redesign for quality of care and patient safety.基于人因工程学(HFE)的医疗系统重新设计以提高医疗质量和患者安全的系统评价。
Ergonomics. 2015;58(1):33-49. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.959070. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
9
Usability and training differences between two personal insulin pumps.两种个人胰岛素泵的可用性和培训差异
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Mar;9(2):221-30. doi: 10.1177/1932296814555158. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
10
Human factors and health information technology: current challenges and future directions.人为因素与健康信息技术:当前挑战与未来方向。
Yearb Med Inform. 2014 Aug 15;9(1):58-66. doi: 10.15265/IY-2014-0005.