Keller Christian, Brimacombe Joseph, Boehler Micheal, Loeckinger Alexander, Puehringer Friedrich
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Leopold-Franzens University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Anesthesiology. 2002 May;96(5):1074-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200205000-00008.
The authors determined the influence of cuff volume and anatomic location on pharyngeal, esophageal, and tracheal mucosal pressures for the esophageal tracheal combitube.
Twenty fresh cadavers were studied. Microchip sensors were attached to the anterior, lateral, and posterior surfaces of the distal and proximal cuffs of the small adult esophageal tracheal combitube. Mucosal pressure for the proximal cuff in the pharynx was measured at 0- to 100-ml cuff volume in 10-ml increments, and for the distal cuff in the esophagus and trachea were measured at 0- to 20-ml cuff volume in 2-ml increments. The proximal cuff volume to form an oropharyngeal seal of 30 cm H2O was determined. In addition, mucosal pressures for the proximal cuff in the pharynx were measured in four awake volunteers with topical anesthesia.
There was an increase in mucosal pressure in the trachea, esophagus, and pharynx at all cuff locations with increasing volume (all: P < 0.001). Pharyngeal mucosal pressures were highest posteriorly (50-ml cuff volume: 99 +/- 62 cm H2O; 100-ml cuff volume: 255 +/- 161 cm H2O). Esophageal mucosal pressures were highest posteriorly (10-ml cuff volume: 108 +/- 55 cm H2O; 20-ml cuff volume: 269 +/- 133 cm H2O). Tracheal mucosal pressures were highest anteriorly (10-ml cuff volume: 98 +/- 53 cm H2O; 20-ml cuff volume: 236 +/- 139 cm H2O). The proximal cuff volume to obtain an oropharyngeal seal of 30 cm H2O was 47 +/- 12 ml. Pharyngeal mucosal pressures were similar for cadavers and awake volunteers.
We conclude that mucosal pressures for the esophageal tracheal combitube increase with cuff volume, are highest where the cuff is adjacent to rigid anatomic structures, and potentially exceed mucosal perfusion pressure even when cuff volumes are limited to achieving an oropharyngeal seal of 30 cm H2O.
作者确定了套囊容积和解剖位置对食管气管联合导管的咽部、食管和气管黏膜压力的影响。
对20具新鲜尸体进行研究。将微芯片传感器附着于成人小号食管气管联合导管远端和近端套囊的前、外侧及后表面。近端套囊在咽部时,以10 ml的增量测量0至100 ml套囊容积下的黏膜压力;远端套囊在食管和气管时,以2 ml的增量测量0至20 ml套囊容积下的黏膜压力。确定形成30 cm H2O口咽密封所需的近端套囊容积。此外,对4名局部麻醉的清醒志愿者测量了咽部近端套囊的黏膜压力。
随着套囊容积增加,气管、食管和咽部所有套囊位置的黏膜压力均升高(均为P < 0.001)。咽部黏膜压力在后部最高(50 ml套囊容积时:99 ± 62 cm H2O;100 ml套囊容积时:255 ± 161 cm H2O)。食管黏膜压力在后部最高(10 ml套囊容积时:108 ± 55 cm H2O;20 ml套囊容积时:269 ± 133 cm H2O)。气管黏膜压力在前部最高(10 ml套囊容积时:98 ± 53 cm H2O;20 ml套囊容积时:236 ± 139 cm H2O)。获得30 cm H2O口咽密封所需的近端套囊容积为47 ± 12 ml。尸体和清醒志愿者的咽部黏膜压力相似。
我们得出结论,食管气管联合导管的黏膜压力随套囊容积增加而升高,在套囊邻近坚硬解剖结构处最高,即使套囊容积限于实现30 cm H2O口咽密封时,也可能超过黏膜灌注压。