Ezenwaka C E, Offiah N V
Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago, West Indies.
West Indian Med J. 2001 Dec;50(4):288-93.
The aim of this study is to assess the plasma glycaemia of patients attending the diabetes mellitus outpatients' clinics in Trinidad and to determine how different plasma glycaemia would affect cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. One hundred and ninety-one patients (64 males, 127 females, mean age 56.6 +/- 0.8 yr) with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean duration 9.2 +/- 0.6 yr) attending diabetes mellitus clinics from January to April 2000 participated in the study. Anthropometric indices (weight, height, waist and hip circumferences) and blood pressure were measured and overnight fasting blood samples were collected for glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), glucose, lipids (triglyceride, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol) and creatinine determinations. The patients were categorized into Group 1 ('well controlled'; HbA1c < 7.0%) and Group 2 ('poorly controlled'; HbA1c > 7.0%). Although the majority (85%) of patients were poorly controlled', there were no significant differences in the age, duration of diabetes mellitus, body mass index and waist/hip ratios between the two groups of patients (p > 0.05). Similarly, the blood pressure and lipid (total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol) levels did not differ between the two groups (p > 0.05) although triglyceride (1.4 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.1 mmol/L) levels were higher in patients in Group 2 compared with Group 1 (p < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis indicates that the levels of blood pressure, lipid and anthropometric parameters were not significantly dependent on the plasma glycaemia of the patients (p > 0.05). Analysis of the data has shown that the majority of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus attending primary care clinics in Trinidad had poor glycaemic control. The poorly controlled patients had similar levels of CVD risk factors to 'well controlled' patients although the former were potentially at greater risk of progressing to cardiovascular disorder than 'well controlled' patients.
本研究的目的是评估特立尼达糖尿病门诊患者的血浆血糖水平,并确定不同的血浆血糖水平如何影响心血管疾病(CVD)风险因素。2000年1月至4月期间,191例2型糖尿病患者(64例男性,127例女性,平均年龄56.6±0.8岁,平均病程9.2±0.6年)参与了该研究,这些患者均来自糖尿病门诊。测量了人体测量指标(体重、身高、腰围和臀围)和血压,并采集过夜空腹血样用于测定糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、血糖、血脂(甘油三酯、总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇)和肌酐。患者被分为第1组(“控制良好”;HbA1c<7.0%)和第2组(“控制不佳”;HbA1c>7.0%)。尽管大多数(85%)患者“控制不佳”,但两组患者在年龄、糖尿病病程、体重指数和腰臀比方面无显著差异(p>0.05)。同样,两组患者的血压和血脂(总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇)水平也无差异(p>0.05),不过第2组患者的甘油三酯水平(1.4±0.1 vs. 2.2±0.1 mmol/L)高于第1组(p<0.05)。多元线性回归分析表明,血压、血脂和人体测量参数水平与患者的血浆血糖水平无显著相关性(p>0.05)。数据分析表明,在特立尼达初级保健诊所就诊的大多数2型糖尿病患者血糖控制不佳。尽管血糖控制不佳的患者进展为心血管疾病的潜在风险可能比“控制良好”的患者更大,但他们的心血管疾病风险因素水平与“控制良好”的患者相似。