Suppr超能文献

[心肺复苏期间精氨酸血管加压素的应用。实验与临床经验分析及未来展望]

[The use of arginine vasopressin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An analysis of experimental and clinical experience and a view of the future].

作者信息

Wenzel V, Krismer A C, Voelckel W G, Mayr V D, Raedler C, Strohmenger H U, Lindner K H

机构信息

Leopold-Franzens-Universität, Univ.-Klinik für Anaesthesie und Allg. Intensivmedizin, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Osterreich.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 2002 Mar;51(3):191-202. doi: 10.1007/s00101-002-0287-8.

Abstract

The risks and benefits of epinephrine given during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are controversially discussed. Animal experiments revealed beta-receptor-mediated adverse effects of epinephrine such as increased myocardial oxygen consumption, ventricular arrhythmia, ventilation-perfusion defects, and cardiac failure in the postresuscitation phase. In clinical studies, high-dose vs. standard-dose epinephrine was unable to improve resuscitation success. During CPR in patients, endogenous arginine vasopressin (AVP) levels were increased and surviving vs. non-surviving patients had significantly higher AVP levels. This may indicate that the human body discharges AVP during life-threatening situations as an additional vasopressor to catecholamines in order to maintain cardiocirculatory homeostasis. In different experimental CPR models, AVP compared with epinephrine given during CPR significantly improved vital organ blood flow, coronary perfusion pressure, resuscitability, and long-term survival. During prolonged CPR with repeated drug administration, AVP but not epinephrine maintained coronary perfusion pressure on a level that ensured return of spontaneous circulation. Also, AVP can be administered successfully in the intravenous dose into the endobronchial tree, and also intraosseously. When given during CPR, AVP induces a transient splanchnic hypoperfusion, and an increase in systemic vascular resistance, both of which normalized spontaneously; furthermore, an oligo-anuric state was not observed. In two clinical studies, AVP vs. epinephrine improved 24-h survival during out-of-hospital CPR, and comparable CPR outcome during in-hospital CPR. The new CPR guidelines of both the American Heart Association and the European Resuscitation Council assign a given CPR intervention into classes of recommendation [class 1 (definitely recommended), class 2 A (intervention of choice), class 2B (alternative intervention), class X (neutral), or class 3 (not recommended)]. For CPR of adults with shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation, 40 units AVP or 1 mg epinephrine is recommended (class 2B); patients with asystole or pulseless electrical activity should be resuscitated with epinephrine. AVP is not recommended for adult cardiac arrest patients with asystole or pulseless electrical activity; or pediatric cardiac arrest patients due to a lack of clinical data. Until definitive data about AVP vs. epinephrine effects during CPR are available, the present state of knowledge should be interpreted that two vasopressors are available for use instead of one.

摘要

心肺复苏(CPR)期间使用肾上腺素的风险和益处存在争议。动物实验揭示了肾上腺素的β受体介导的不良反应,如复苏后阶段心肌耗氧量增加、室性心律失常、通气灌注缺陷和心力衰竭。在临床研究中,高剂量与标准剂量的肾上腺素均未能提高复苏成功率。在患者进行心肺复苏期间,内源性精氨酸血管加压素(AVP)水平升高,存活患者与未存活患者相比,AVP水平显著更高。这可能表明人体在危及生命的情况下释放AVP作为儿茶酚胺之外的一种额外血管加压素,以维持心血管循环稳态。在不同的实验性心肺复苏模型中,与心肺复苏期间给予的肾上腺素相比,AVP显著改善了重要器官的血流、冠状动脉灌注压、复苏能力和长期存活率。在长时间心肺复苏并重复给药时,AVP而非肾上腺素能将冠状动脉灌注压维持在确保自主循环恢复的水平。此外,AVP可以成功地以静脉剂量注入支气管树内,也可经骨内给药。在心肺复苏期间给予AVP时,会引起短暂的内脏低灌注和全身血管阻力增加,两者均会自发恢复正常;此外,未观察到少尿 - 无尿状态。在两项临床研究中,与肾上腺素相比,AVP改善了院外心肺复苏期间的24小时存活率,以及院内心肺复苏期间的类似心肺复苏结果。美国心脏协会和欧洲复苏委员会的新心肺复苏指南将特定的心肺复苏干预措施分为推荐类别[1类(绝对推荐)、2A类(首选干预措施)、2B类(替代干预措施)、X类(中性)或3类(不推荐)]。对于伴有难治性室颤的成人心肺复苏,推荐使用40单位AVP或1毫克肾上腺素(2B类);心脏停搏或无脉电活动的患者应使用肾上腺素进行复苏。对于心脏停搏或无脉电活动的成人心脏骤停患者,不推荐使用AVP;由于缺乏临床数据,也不推荐用于小儿心脏骤停患者。在获得关于心肺复苏期间AVP与肾上腺素作用的确切数据之前,应根据目前的知识状况理解为有两种血管加压素可供使用而非一种。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验