Prieto L, Roset M, Badia X
FPCE Blanquerna, Universitat Ramon Llull, C/Cister, 34, 08022 Barcelona, Spain.
J Appl Meas. 2001;2(1):48-64.
The Assessment of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults (AGHDA) questionnaire was previously designed, translated and validated in several European countries to evaluate the impact of the disease on Quality of Life. This study aimed to test the metric properties of the Spanish version by means of Rasch analysis. A sample of 356 consecutive adult patients with untreated GHD was included in the study. Patients responded to the questionnaire at baseline and 12 months apart. Answers were analyzed following the dichotomous logistic response model. Parameter estimates, model-data fit and separation statistics were computed. The invariance of the item parameters across time was tested in the follow-up. Rasch results were additionally employed to ascertain score changes through the calculation of the Reliable Change Index (RCI). Items varied in severity from 8.3 -16.8 units (SE= 0.4-0.5) and fit to define a unidimensional variable. The item separation index (SI)(5.2) indicates a good and reliable (0.9) separation of items along the variable that they define. Moreover, results showed the AGHDA conforms to the model expectation of item parameter invariance between administrations. The substantial (2.3) and reliable (0.8) person SI also suggests the sample was well targeted by the questionnaire. According to the RCI, 84% of the patients did not show a significant transition in their measures. Results denote the items of the AGHDA succeeded in defining a scale characterized by the interval-level of its measures, suggesting the questionnaire could be a useful complement of the clinical evaluation of GHD patients at both group and individual level.
成人生长激素缺乏症评估(AGHDA)问卷先前已在多个欧洲国家设计、翻译并验证,用于评估该疾病对生活质量的影响。本研究旨在通过拉施分析测试西班牙语版本的计量学特性。该研究纳入了356例未经治疗的成人生长激素缺乏症患者的连续样本。患者在基线时及间隔12个月时回答问卷。答案按照二分逻辑反应模型进行分析。计算参数估计值、模型-数据拟合度和区分统计量。在随访中测试项目参数随时间的不变性。此外,通过计算可靠变化指数(RCI),利用拉施分析结果确定得分变化。各项目的严重程度在8.3 - 16.8单位之间变化(标准误= 0.4 - 0.5),且适合定义一个单维变量。项目区分指数(SI)(5.2)表明各项目在它们所定义的变量上有良好且可靠的(0.9)区分度。此外,结果表明AGHDA符合不同施测之间项目参数不变性的模型预期。较大的(2.3)且可靠的(0.8)人员SI也表明该问卷对样本的针对性良好。根据RCI,84%的患者在测量中未显示出显著变化。结果表明,AGHDA的项目成功定义了一个以其测量的区间水平为特征的量表,这表明该问卷在群体和个体层面上都可能是生长激素缺乏症患者临床评估的有用补充。