Amadori M, Tagliabue S, Lauzi S, Finazzi G, Lombardi G, Teló P, Pacciarini L, Bonizzi L
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia-Romagna, Brescia, Italy.
J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2002 Mar;49(2):89-96. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0450.2002.00513.x.
Because of the frequent exposure of cattle to mycobacteria of the avium/intracellulare group, an investigation was carried out into the possible repercussions thereof on the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. Three calves from a bovine tuberculosis-free herd, scored avian reactors in the gamma-interferon assay for bovine tuberculosis, were sedated and inoculated endotracheally with a virulent Mycobacterium bovis strain. Then, three other avian reactors were housed with the above donor calves. Mycobacterium bovis was isolated from the nasal swabs of the three endotracheally infected, donor calves. On these samples, TB complex-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests for IS6110 were also positive, albeit with a different time kinetics. The three contact-infected calves showed clear immunological signs of infection; however, their nasal swabs were always PCR-negative and only Mycobacterium avium was isolated. In the endotracheally infected donor calves there was a rise of the gamma-interferon responses to avian and bovine purified protein derivative (PPD) tuberculins, which reached the same stable plateau levels over the whole experiment. The above effect was also observed in the contact-infected calves, even though the response to avian PPD tuberculin always remained at a higher level. By using conventional bovine and avian PPD tuberculins, the comparative intradermal test was generally positive in endotracheally infected, as opposed to contact-infected calves; a positive intradermal test for M. bovis was obtained in two contact-infected calves by different bovine PPD tuberculins based on M. bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) secreted or somatic antigens. It was concluded that M. bovis infection may be concealed for some time in cattle sensitized by mycobacteria of the avium/intracellulare group and that different diagnostic procedures should be adopted for such animals.
由于牛频繁接触鸟型/胞内型分枝杆菌,因此开展了一项调查,研究其对牛结核病诊断可能产生的影响。从一个无牛结核病的牛群中选取了三头小牛,它们在牛结核病的γ干扰素检测中被判定为禽型反应者,对其进行镇静后经气管内接种一株强毒牛分枝杆菌菌株。然后,将另外三头禽型反应者与上述供体小牛饲养在一起。从经气管内感染的三头供体小牛的鼻拭子中分离出了牛分枝杆菌。对这些样本进行的针对IS6110的结核复合体特异性聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测也呈阳性,尽管时间动态有所不同。三头接触感染的小牛表现出明显的感染免疫迹象;然而,它们的鼻拭子PCR检测始终为阴性,仅分离出鸟分枝杆菌。在经气管内感染的供体小牛中,对禽型和牛型纯化蛋白衍生物(PPD)结核菌素的γ干扰素反应有所升高,在整个实验过程中达到了相同的稳定平台水平。在接触感染的小牛中也观察到了上述效应,尽管对禽型PPD结核菌素的反应始终保持在较高水平。使用传统的牛型和禽型PPD结核菌素时,经气管内感染的小牛的比较皮内试验通常为阳性,而接触感染的小牛则相反;通过基于卡介苗(BCG)分泌或菌体抗原的不同牛型PPD结核菌素,在两头接触感染的小牛中获得了牛分枝杆菌皮内试验阳性结果。得出的结论是,在被鸟型/胞内型分枝杆菌致敏的牛中,牛分枝杆菌感染可能会被隐匿一段时间,对此类动物应采用不同的诊断程序。