Sugawara Tatsuo, Hirasawa Akira, Hashimoto Keitaro, Tsujimoto Gozoh
Department of Molecular, Cell Pharmacology, National Children's Medical Research Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Life Sci. 2002 Mar 22;70(18):2113-24. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(01)01533-8.
G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) subtypes are differentially distributed in the cell; however, it remains unclear how this affects the subtype selectivity of particular drugs. In the present study, we used flow cytometry analysis with the fluorescent ligand, BODIPY FL-prazosin, to study the relationship between the subcellular distribution of subtype receptors and the subtype-selective character of ligands using alpha1a and alpha1b-adrenoceptors (ARs). Alpha1a-ARs predominantly localize inside the cell, while alpha1b-ARs on the cell surface. Flow cytometry analysis and confocal laser-scanning micrographs of living cells showed that BODIPY FL-prazosin can label not only alpha1-ARs on the cell surface, but also those localized inside the cell. Furthermore, flow cytometry analysis of alpha1A-AR-selective drug, KMD-3213, and alpha1B-AR-selective drug, CEC, revealed that the major determinant of the subtype selectivity of each drug is different. The alpha1A-AR selectivity of KMD-3213 can be explained by its much higher affinity for alpha1a-AR than alpha1b-AR (affinity-dependent selectivity), while the alpha1B-AR selectivity of the hydrophilic alkylating agent CEC is due to preferential inactivation of alpha1-ARs on the cell surface (receptor localization-dependent selectivity). This study illustrates that factors in addition to the affinity of the drug for the receptor, such as subcellular localization of the receptor, should be taken into account in assessing the subtype selectivity of a drug.
G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)亚型在细胞中呈差异分布;然而,目前尚不清楚这如何影响特定药物的亚型选择性。在本研究中,我们使用荧光配体BODIPY FL-哌唑嗪进行流式细胞术分析,以研究使用α1a和α1b肾上腺素能受体(ARs)时亚型受体的亚细胞分布与配体的亚型选择性特征之间的关系。α1a-ARs主要定位于细胞内,而α1b-ARs位于细胞表面。活细胞的流式细胞术分析和共聚焦激光扫描显微镜图像显示,BODIPY FL-哌唑嗪不仅可以标记细胞表面的α1-ARs,还可以标记定位于细胞内的α1-ARs。此外,对α1A-AR选择性药物KMD-3213和α1B-AR选择性药物CEC的流式细胞术分析表明,每种药物亚型选择性的主要决定因素是不同的。KMD-3213对α1A-AR的选择性可以通过其对α1a-AR的亲和力远高于α1b-AR来解释(亲和力依赖性选择性),而亲水性烷基化剂CEC对α1B-AR的选择性是由于细胞表面α1-ARs的优先失活(受体定位依赖性选择性)。本研究表明,在评估药物的亚型选择性时,除了药物对受体的亲和力外,还应考虑其他因素,如受体的亚细胞定位。