Cemri Mustafa, Timurkaynak Timur, Ozdemir Murat, Boyaci Bülent, Yalcin Ridvan, Cengel Atiye, Dörtlemez Ovsev, Dörtlemez Halis
Gazi University School of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Ankara, Turkey.
Acta Cardiol. 2002 Apr;57(2):101-5. doi: 10.2143/AC.57.2.2005380.
It has been claimed that left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction impairs left atrial (LA) and left atrial appendage (LAA) functions. In this study, we compared the LA and LAA function parameters in patients with chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) with and without LV systolic dysfunction.
The study population consisted of 28 patients with chronic nonvalvularAF. Group I consisted of 12 patients with LV systolic dysfunction (mean age: 61 +/- 14 years; LV ejection fraction: 44 +/- 6%), group II of 16 patients with normal LV systolic function (mean age: 52 +/- 15 years; LV ejection fraction: 65 +/- 3%). LV ejection fraction (EF) was measured by echocardiography utilizing bi-plane area length method. The following LA and LAA transoesophageal echocardiography parameters were obtained: I) LA diameter, 2) LAA ejection velocity, 3) LAA filling velocity, 4) LAA ejection fraction, 5) pulmonary venous (PV) systolic velocity, 6) PV diastolic velocity, 7) PV systolic velocity/diastolic velocity ratio. The left atrium diameter was significantly larger in group I than in group 11 (4.7 +/- 0.7 cm vs. 3.8 +/- 0.6 cm, p < 0.05). The LAA ejection velocity and LAA ejection fraction were significantly lower in group I than in group 11 (22.6 +/- 15.5 cm/s vs 37.5 +/- 11.3 cm/s and 26.9 +/- 20.8% vs. 41.3 +/- 10.9%, p < 0.05 for both comparisons). The PV systolic velocity and PV systolic velocity/diastolic velocity ratio were significantly smaller in group I than in group II (26.2 +/- 14.8 cm/s vs. 51.5 +/- 22 cm/s and 0.7 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.5, p < 0.05 for both comparisons). Although decreased LAA filling and PV diastolic velocities were determined in group I, no significant difference existed between groups I and II. Thrombus and/or spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) in the LA and/or LAA were more frequent in group I (75% vs. 18%, p < 0.05).
These results indicate that LV systolic dysfunction impairs various LA and LA function parameters and is associated with an increased frequency of SEC and/or LA thrombus in patients with chronic nonvalvularAF.
据称左心室(LV)收缩功能障碍会损害左心房(LA)和左心耳(LAA)功能。在本研究中,我们比较了有和没有LV收缩功能障碍的慢性非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)患者的LA和LAA功能参数。
研究人群包括28例慢性非瓣膜性AF患者。第一组由12例LV收缩功能障碍患者组成(平均年龄:61±14岁;LV射血分数:44±6%),第二组由16例LV收缩功能正常的患者组成(平均年龄:52±15岁;LV射血分数:65±3%)。采用双平面面积长度法通过超声心动图测量LV射血分数(EF)。获得以下LA和LAA经食管超声心动图参数:I)LA直径,2)LAA射血速度,3)LAA充盈速度,4)LAA射血分数,5)肺静脉(PV)收缩期速度,6)PV舒张期速度,7)PV收缩期速度/舒张期速度比值。第一组的左心房直径明显大于第二组(4.7±0.7cm对3.8±0.6cm,p<0.05)。第一组的LAA射血速度和LAA射血分数明显低于第二组(22.6±15.5cm/s对37.5±11.3cm/s以及26.9±20.8%对41.3±10.9%,两组比较p均<0.05)。第一组的PV收缩期速度和PV收缩期速度/舒张期速度比值明显小于第二组(26.2±14.8cm/s对51.5±22cm/s以及0.7±0.6对1.2±0.5,两组比较p均<0.05)。虽然第一组中LAA充盈和PV舒张期速度降低,但第一组和第二组之间无显著差异。第一组中LA和/或LAA内血栓和/或自发回声增强(SEC)更常见(75%对18%,p<0.05)。
这些结果表明,LV收缩功能障碍会损害多种LA和LAA功能参数,并与慢性非瓣膜性AF患者中SEC和/或LA血栓的发生率增加相关。