Pukrop Ralf
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Germany.
J Pers Disord. 2002 Apr;16(2):135-47. doi: 10.1521/pedi.16.2.135.22550.
The present study examined the sensitivity and clinical specificity of dimensional personality profiles associated with borderline personality disorder (BPD) by comparing three groups of patients: (a) patients with BPD according to DSM-IV criteria (n = 31); (b) patients with other DSM-IV PD (n = 31); and (c) general population controls (n = 31). All three samples were matched for age and gender and the two patient samples were matched for chronicity and depressive symptoms. All patients were given the Six-Factor Test measuring the five-factor model of personality (FFM), the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI), and the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology (DAPP). Nonparametric statistics were applied to analyze the data (Mann-Whitney-U-tests for group comparisons; Spearman's coefficients for correlational analyses). Neuroticism (FFM), Self-Directedness (TCI), and Emotional Dysregulation (DAPP) were identified as general markers of personality pathology, which were significantly interrelated in all three samples. BPD patients also showed a specific profile compared with other PD patients with lower scores on Agreeableness (FFM), higher scores on Novelty Seeking and Self-Transcendence (TCI), and higher scores on the DAPP higher-order dimensions of Emotional Dysregulation, Dissocial Behavior, and Inhibitedness. Results support the assumption that BPD can be characterized by dimensional approaches with sufficient sensitivity in comparison with healthy controls and specificity in comparison with other PD patients.
本研究通过比较三组患者,检验了与边缘型人格障碍(BPD)相关的维度人格剖面图的敏感性和临床特异性:(a)根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)标准诊断为BPD的患者(n = 31);(b)患有其他DSM-IV人格障碍(PD)的患者(n = 31);以及(c)普通人群对照组(n = 31)。所有三个样本在年龄和性别上进行了匹配,两个患者样本在病程和抑郁症状方面进行了匹配。所有患者均接受了测量人格五因素模型(FFM)的六因素测试、气质与性格量表(TCI)以及人格病理学维度评估(DAPP)。应用非参数统计方法分析数据(组间比较采用曼-惠特尼U检验;相关分析采用斯皮尔曼系数)。神经质(FFM)、自我导向(TCI)和情绪失调(DAPP)被确定为人格病理学的一般标志物,在所有三个样本中均显著相关。与其他PD患者相比,BPD患者还表现出特定的剖面图,在宜人性(FFM)上得分较低,在寻求新奇和自我超越(TCI)上得分较高,在DAPP的情绪失调、反社会行为和抑制性等高阶维度上得分较高。结果支持这样的假设,即与健康对照相比,BPD可以通过具有足够敏感性的维度方法来表征,与其他PD患者相比具有特异性。