Gillam Barbara, Chan Wing Man
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Psychol Sci. 2002 May;13(3):279-83. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00451.
Perceived occlusion of aligned T-junctions and subjective contours at implicit T-junctions are often assumed to be related but are rarely examined with respect to common mechanisms. Using the method of paired comparison, we measured the strength of perceived occlusion at explicit T-junctions and the strength of subjective contours at implicit T-junctions (using different subjects) along the aligned edges of eight sets of inducer shapes. Sets varied in the similarity of component shapes with respect to orientation, height, width, and color With increasing shape similarity there was a striking decrease in both the strength of subjective contours and the strength of perceived occlusion; the correlation between these two kinds of judgments was .97. We conclude that common mechanisms underlie these two percepts and that edge alignment is a much stronger indicator of occlusion for poorly grouped than for strongly grouped inducers.
人们通常认为,对齐的T型交叉点处的感知遮挡和隐式T型交叉点处的主观轮廓是相关的,但很少从共同机制的角度进行研究。我们采用配对比较法,沿着八组诱导形状的对齐边缘,测量了显性T型交叉点处的感知遮挡强度和隐性T型交叉点处的主观轮廓强度(使用不同的受试者)。这些组在组成形状在方向、高度、宽度和颜色方面的相似性上有所不同。随着形状相似性的增加,主观轮廓强度和感知遮挡强度均显著下降;这两种判断之间的相关性为0.97。我们得出结论,这两种感知有共同的机制,并且对于分组不佳的诱导物,边缘对齐是比分组良好的诱导物更强的遮挡指标。