• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

摩擦力和切向力变化在触觉粗糙度主观评定中的作用。

Role of friction and tangential force variation in the subjective scaling of tactile roughness.

作者信息

Smith Allan M, Chapman C Elaine, Deslandes Mélanie, Langlais Jean-Sébastien, Thibodeau Marie-Pierre

机构信息

Centre de Recherche en Sciences Neurologiques, Département de Physiologie, Université de Montréal, CP 6128 Succursale Centre ville, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3C 3T8.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2002 May;144(2):211-23. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1015-y. Epub 2002 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-002-1015-y
PMID:12012159
Abstract

The present study examined the contribution of normal (Fz) and tangential (Fx) forces, and their ratio, kinetic friction (Fx/Fz), to the subjective magnitude estimations of roughness. The results suggested that the rate of variation in tangential stroking force is a significant determinant of roughness perception. In the first experiment, six volunteer subjects scaled the roughness of eight surfaces explored with a single, active scan of the middle finger. The surfaces were 7.5x2.4-cm polymer strips embossed with truncated cones 1.8 mm high with a spatial period of 2.0 mm in the transverse direction and 1.5-8.5 mm in the longitudinal, scanning direction. The surfaces were mounted on a six-axis force and torque sensor that measured the perpendicular, contact force (normal to the skin surface) and the tangential force along the axis of stroking. The results confirmed the findings of an earlier study that magnitude estimates of perceived roughness increase approximately linearly up to a longitudinal spatial period of 8.5 mm. Across subjects, no consistent correlations were found between perceived roughness and either the mean normal or tangential force alone. Although significant positive correlations were found between roughness and mean kinetic friction for all subjects, they were not as consistently robust as one might have expected. Furthermore, instantaneous kinetic friction varied widely over the course of a single stroke because of within trial oscillations in the tangential force. The amplitude of these oscillations increased with the longitudinal spatial period and their frequency was determined by a combination of the spatial period and the stroking velocity. These oscillations were even more conspicuous in the first derivative or rate of change of the tangential force (dFx/d t), which was quantified as the root mean square (RMS) of the tangential force rate. The mean normalized RMS proved to be strongly correlated with subjective roughness, averaging 0.88 for all subjects. In order to dissociate the fluctuations in tangential force from both the surface structure and the mean kinetic friction, a second experiment was performed on six additional subjects who estimated the roughness of identical lubricated and unlubricated (dry) surfaces. Lubrication with liquid soap reduced the mean kinetic friction by approximately 40%, the RMS of the tangential force rate by slightly more than 21% and the subjective estimates of roughness by 16.4%. Taken together, the results suggest that in tactile exploration, the RMS of the tangential force rate may be an important determinant of subjective roughness.

摘要

本研究考察了法向力(Fz)和切向力(Fx)及其比值即动摩擦(Fx/Fz)对粗糙度主观大小估计的贡献。结果表明,切向抚摸力的变化率是粗糙度感知的一个重要决定因素。在第一个实验中,六名志愿者受试者对用中指单次主动扫描探索的八个表面的粗糙度进行了评分。这些表面是7.5×2.4厘米的聚合物条,上面压印有高1.8毫米的截头圆锥体,横向空间周期为2.0毫米,纵向扫描方向为1.5 - 8.5毫米。这些表面安装在一个六轴力和扭矩传感器上,该传感器测量垂直的接触力(垂直于皮肤表面)和沿抚摸轴的切向力。结果证实了早期一项研究的发现,即感知粗糙度的大小估计在纵向空间周期达到8.5毫米之前大致呈线性增加。在所有受试者中,单独的感知粗糙度与平均法向力或切向力之间均未发现一致的相关性。尽管在所有受试者中粗糙度与平均动摩擦之间均发现了显著的正相关,但它们并不像预期的那样一致且稳健。此外,由于单次抚摸过程中切向力的试验内振荡,瞬时动摩擦在单次抚摸过程中变化很大。这些振荡的幅度随着纵向空间周期的增加而增大,其频率由空间周期和抚摸速度共同决定。这些振荡在切向力的一阶导数或变化率(dFx/dt)中更为明显,该变化率被量化为切向力变化率的均方根(RMS)。平均归一化RMS被证明与主观粗糙度密切相关,所有受试者的平均值为0.88。为了将切向力的波动与表面结构和平均动摩擦区分开来,对另外六名受试者进行了第二个实验,他们对相同的润滑和未润滑(干燥)表面的粗糙度进行了估计。用液体肥皂润滑使平均动摩擦降低了约40%,切向力变化率的RMS降低了略超过21%,粗糙度的主观估计降低了16.4%。综合来看,结果表明在触觉探索中,切向力变化率的RMS可能是主观粗糙度的一个重要决定因素。

相似文献

1
Role of friction and tangential force variation in the subjective scaling of tactile roughness.摩擦力和切向力变化在触觉粗糙度主观评定中的作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2002 May;144(2):211-23. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1015-y. Epub 2002 Mar 22.
2
Deployment of fingertip forces in tactile exploration.触觉探索中指尖力的运用。
Exp Brain Res. 2002 Nov;147(2):209-18. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1240-4. Epub 2002 Sep 20.
3
Subjective scaling of smooth surface friction.光滑表面摩擦力的主观标度
J Neurophysiol. 1996 May;75(5):1957-62. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.5.1957.
4
Roughness of simulated surfaces examined with a haptic tool: effects of spatial period, friction, and resistance amplitude.使用触觉工具检测模拟表面的粗糙度:空间周期、摩擦和阻力幅度的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Apr;202(1):33-43. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2105-x. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
5
Tangential torque effects on the control of grip forces when holding objects with a precision grip.用精确抓握方式握持物体时,切向扭矩对握力控制的影响。
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Sep;78(3):1619-30. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.78.3.1619.
6
Tactile Roughness Perception of Virtual Gratings by Electrovibration.电振动刺激下虚拟光栅的触觉粗糙度感知
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2020 Jul-Sep;13(3):562-570. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2019.2959993. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
7
The physical basis of perceived roughness in virtual sinusoidal textures.虚拟正弦纹理中感知粗糙度的物理基础。
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2013 Oct-Dec;6(4):496-505. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2013.35.
8
Surface exploration using laparoscopic surgical instruments: the perception of surface roughness.使用腹腔镜手术器械进行表面探查:对表面粗糙度的感知
Ergonomics. 2005 Jun 10;48(7):874-94. doi: 10.1080/00140130500123704.
9
Relative effects of the spatial and temporal characteristics of scanned surfaces on human perception of tactile roughness using passive touch.使用被动触觉时,扫描表面的空间和时间特征对人类触觉粗糙度感知的相对影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2000 Jun;132(3):351-61. doi: 10.1007/s002210000348.
10
Neuronal activity in somatosensory cortex related to tactile exploration.体感皮层中与触觉探索相关的神经元活动。
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan 1;115(1):112-26. doi: 10.1152/jn.00747.2014. Epub 2015 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Texture perception at the foot sole: comparison between walking, sitting, and to the hand.足底纹理感知:行走、坐姿与手部感知的比较。
J Neurophysiol. 2024 Sep 1;132(3):643-652. doi: 10.1152/jn.00170.2024. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
2
Effects of Sensing Tactile Arrays, Shear Force, and Proprioception of Robot on Texture Recognition.机器人触觉阵列、剪切力和本体感觉对纹理识别的影响。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 17;23(6):3201. doi: 10.3390/s23063201.
3
Precise and stable edge orientation signaling by human first-order tactile neurons.人类一级触觉神经元精确稳定的边缘方向信号传导。
Elife. 2022 Oct 31;11:e81476. doi: 10.7554/eLife.81476.
4
Roughness perception: A multisensory/crossmodal perspective.粗糙度感知:多感觉/跨模态视角。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Oct;84(7):2087-2114. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02550-y. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
5
Skin and Mechanoreceptor Contribution to Tactile Input for Perception: A Review of Simulation Models.皮肤和机械感受器对触觉输入感知的贡献:模拟模型综述
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jun 2;16:862344. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.862344. eCollection 2022.
6
Influence of different fluid environments on tactile perception and finger friction.不同流体环境对触觉感知和手指摩擦力的影响。
J R Soc Interface. 2022 Mar;19(188):20210783. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0783. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
7
Research on tactile perception by skin friction based on a multimodal method.基于多模态方法的皮肤摩擦触觉感知研究。
Skin Res Technol. 2022 Mar;28(2):280-290. doi: 10.1111/srt.13127. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
8
Neural correlates of tactile hardness intensity perception during active grasping.主动抓握过程中触觉硬度强度感知的神经关联
PeerJ. 2021 Aug 2;9:e11760. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11760. eCollection 2021.
9
Human low-threshold mechanoafferent responses to pure changes in friction controlled using an ultrasonic haptic device.人对纯摩擦变化的低阈值机械传入反应,使用超声触觉设备进行控制。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 27;11(1):11227. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90533-8.
10
Feeling fooled: Texture contaminates the neural code for tactile speed.感觉受骗了:质地污染了触觉速度的神经编码。
PLoS Biol. 2019 Aug 27;17(8):e3000431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000431. eCollection 2019 Aug.