Dey P, Gibbs A, Arnold D F, Saleh N, Hirsch P J, Woodman C B J
Centre for Cancer Epidemiology, Withington, Manchester, UK.
BJOG. 2002 Apr;109(4):381-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01277.x.
To determine whether loop diathermy excision of the transformation zone and laser vaporisation are equally effective in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Randomised controlled trial.
Women referred for evaluation of cytological abnormality who were considered suitable for outpatient local destructive treatment.
Seven colposcopy units in the North West Region.
Loop diathermy excision of the transformation zone and laser vaporisation.
Smear reported as moderate dyskariosis or worse following treatment.
Of 289 women randomised, 285 had one or more smears following treatment. Women were more likely to have a smear reported as moderate dyskariosis or worse following laser vaporisation [hazard ratio 3.01 (95% CI 1.27 to 7.12)]. The cumulative risk of a smear reported as moderate dyskariosis or worse was 6.0% at six months and 12.1% at three years in those allocated laser vaporisation, and 2.0% at six months, and 3.3% at three years in those allocated loop diathermy excision of the transformation zone.
Loop diathermy excision is a more effective treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia than laser vaporisation.
确定宫颈转化区环形电切术和激光汽化术在治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变方面是否同样有效。
随机对照试验。
因细胞学异常转诊进行评估且被认为适合门诊局部破坏性治疗的女性。
西北地区的七个阴道镜检查单位。
宫颈转化区环形电切术和激光汽化术。
治疗后涂片报告为中度核异质或更严重情况。
289名随机分组的女性中,285名在治疗后进行了一次或多次涂片检查。激光汽化术后女性涂片报告为中度核异质或更严重情况的可能性更大[风险比3.01(95%可信区间1.27至7.12)]。接受激光汽化术的女性中,涂片报告为中度核异质或更严重情况的累积风险在六个月时为6.0%,三年时为12.1%;而接受宫颈转化区环形电切术的女性中,六个月时为2.0%,三年时为3.3%。
宫颈转化区环形电切术在治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变方面比激光汽化术更有效。