• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为一种教育工具的外科手术发病率和死亡率会议。

The surgical morbidity and mortality meeting as an educational tool.

作者信息

Abu-Zidan F M, Premadasa I G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University.

出版信息

Med J Malaysia. 2001 Dec;56(4):441-5.

PMID:12014763
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed at evaluating the educational value of the morbidity mortality meeting and benefits obtained from it so as to implement changes that can improve it.

METHODS

Surgeons (n = 13) at a university hospital responded anonymously to a questionnaire which was structured to monitor the educational activity of the morbidity mortality meeting. They indicated their perceptions on a five-point scale (very poor, poor, fair, good and very good). Depending on the results of the first questionnaire, these changes were made: 1) Standardisation of the notice of the Meeting 2) Organization of the meeting 3) Review of the literature on the specific problems encountered. The participants were not aware of the results of the first questionnaire. Nine weeks later, the same questionnaire was repeated (n=12). Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the ratings of the two questionnaires.

RESULTS

The attributes which showed significant improvement between the first and second questionnaires were a) organization (p = 0.004; (median (range) 3 (2-5) compared with 5 (3-5)) b) knowledge is up-to-date (p < 0.005; (median (range) 3 (2-4) compared with 4 (3-5)), c) discussion related to the problem (0.01; (median (range) 3 (1-4) compared with 4 (3-5)) and d) notice of the meeting (p < 0.026; (median (range) 3 (2-4) compared with 4 (2-5)).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that specific actions can improve the educational quality of the morbidity mortality meeting.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估发病率死亡率会议的教育价值及其带来的益处,以便实施改进措施。

方法

一所大学医院的13名外科医生匿名填写了一份旨在监测发病率死亡率会议教育活动的问卷。他们用五点量表(非常差、差、一般、好、非常好)表明自己的看法。根据第一份问卷的结果,做出了以下改变:1)会议通知标准化;2)会议组织;3)对遇到的具体问题的文献回顾。参与者不知道第一份问卷的结果。九周后,再次发放相同问卷(n = 12)。采用曼-惠特尼检验比较两份问卷的评分。

结果

第一份问卷和第二份问卷之间显示出显著改善的属性包括:a)组织(p = 0.004;中位数(范围)3(2 - 5)与5(3 - 5)相比);b)知识时效性(p < 0.005;中位数(范围)3(2 - 4)与4(3 - 5)相比);c)与问题相关的讨论(p = 0.01;中位数(范围)3(1 - 4)与4(3 - 5)相比);d)会议通知(p < 0.026;中位数(范围)3(2 - 4)与4(2 - 5)相比)。

结论

本研究表明,采取特定行动可以提高发病率死亡率会议的教育质量。

相似文献

1
The surgical morbidity and mortality meeting as an educational tool.作为一种教育工具的外科手术发病率和死亡率会议。
Med J Malaysia. 2001 Dec;56(4):441-5.
2
Instructional skills of surgical tutors.外科带教教师的教学技能。
Singapore Med J. 2002 Dec;43(12):610-3.
3
National survey of surgical morbidity and mortality conferences.全国外科发病率和死亡率会议调查
Am J Surg. 2006 May;191(5):708-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.029.
4
Identification of surgical complications and deaths: an assessment of the traditional surgical morbidity and mortality conference compared with the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.手术并发症及死亡情况的识别:传统外科发病率和死亡率会议与美国外科医师学会-国家外科质量改进计划的评估比较
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Nov;203(5):618-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.010. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
5
Resident versus no resident: a single institutional study on operative complications, mortality, and cost.住院医生与非住院医生:一项关于手术并发症、死亡率和成本的单机构研究。
Surgery. 2008 Aug;144(2):339-44. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.03.031.
6
Brief communication of the Residency Review Committee-Surgery (RRC-S) on residents' surgical volume in general surgery.住院医师评审委员会-外科(RRC-S)关于普通外科住院医师手术量的简短通讯。
Am J Surg. 2005 Sep;190(3):345-50. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.036.
7
Lecture versus standardized patient interaction in the surgical clerkship: a randomized prospective cross-over study.外科实习中讲座与标准化病人互动的比较:一项随机前瞻性交叉研究。
Am J Surg. 2006 Feb;191(2):262-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.045.
8
Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for patients with lower rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy.腹腔镜下保留盆腔自主神经手术治疗低位直肠癌患者放化疗后情况
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Apr;14(4):1285-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9052-6.
9
Surveying general practitioners: a new avenue.对全科医生进行调查:一条新途径。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Mar;20(3):319-24. doi: 10.1185/030079903125002900.
10
Assessing educational validity of the Morbidity and Mortality conference: a pilot study.
Curr Surg. 2003 Mar-Apr;60(2):204-9. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7944(02)00735-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Morbidity and mortality conferences in general surgery: a narrative systematic review.普通外科中的发病率和死亡率会议:叙事性系统评价。
Can J Surg. 2020 May 8;63(3):E211-E222. doi: 10.1503/cjs.009219.