Edwards Phil, Roberts Ian, Clarke Mike, DiGuiseppi Carolyn, Pratap Sarah, Wentz Reinhard, Kwan Irene
CRASH Trial Co-ordinating Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1B 1DP.
BMJ. 2002 May 18;324(7347):1183. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183.
To identify methods to increase response to postal questionnaires.
Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of any method to influence response to postal questionnaires.
292 randomised controlled trials including 258 315 participants INTERVENTION REVIEWED: 75 strategies for influencing response to postal questionnaires.
The proportion of completed or partially completed questionnaires returned.
The odds of response were more than doubled when a monetary incentive was used (odds ratio 2.02; 95% confidence interval 1.79 to 2.27) and almost doubled when incentives were not conditional on response (1.71; 1.29 to 2.26). Response was more likely when short questionnaires were used (1.86; 1.55 to 2.24). Personalised questionnaires and letters increased response (1.16; 1.06 to 1.28), as did the use of coloured ink (1.39; 1.16 to 1.67). The odds of response were more than doubled when the questionnaires were sent by recorded delivery (2.21; 1.51 to 3.25) and increased when stamped return envelopes were used (1.26; 1.13 to 1.41) and questionnaires were sent by first class post (1.12; 1.02 to 1.23). Contacting participants before sending questionnaires increased response (1.54; 1.24 to 1.92), as did follow up contact (1.44; 1.22 to 1.70) and providing non-respondents with a second copy of the questionnaire (1.41; 1.02 to 1.94). Questionnaires designed to be of more interest to participants were more likely to be returned (2.44; 1.99 to 3.01), but questionnaires containing questions of a sensitive nature were less likely to be returned (0.92; 0.87 to 0.98). Questionnaires originating from universities were more likely to be returned than were questionnaires from other sources, such as commercial organisations (1.31; 1.11 to 1.54).
Health researchers using postal questionnaires can improve the quality of their research by using the strategies shown to be effective in this systematic review.
确定提高邮寄问卷调查回复率的方法。
对任何影响邮寄问卷调查回复率的方法进行随机对照试验的系统评价。
292项随机对照试验,包括258315名参与者。
75种影响邮寄问卷调查回复率的策略。
返回的完整或部分完成问卷的比例。
使用金钱激励时回复几率增加一倍多(优势比2.02;95%置信区间1.79至2.27),激励不取决于回复时回复几率几乎翻倍(1.71;1.29至2.26)。使用简短问卷时回复可能性更大(1.86;1.55至2.24)。个性化问卷和信件能提高回复率(1.16;1.06至1.28),使用彩色墨水也有同样效果(1.39;1.16至1.67)。问卷通过挂号信寄送时回复几率增加一倍多(2.21;1.51至3.25),使用贴有邮票的回邮信封(1.26;1.13至1.41)以及问卷通过一类邮件寄送(1.12;1.02至1.23)时回复率也会提高。在发送问卷前联系参与者能提高回复率(1.54;1.24至1.92),后续跟进联系(1.44;1.22至1.70)以及给未回复者提供问卷的第二份副本(1.41;1.02至1.94)也有同样效果。设计得让参与者更感兴趣的问卷更有可能被返回(2.44;1.99至3.01),但包含敏感性质问题的问卷被返回的可能性较小(0.92;0.87至0.98)。来自大学的问卷比来自其他来源(如商业组织)的问卷更有可能被返回(1.31;1.11至1.54)。
使用邮寄问卷的健康研究人员可通过采用本系统评价中显示有效的策略来提高研究质量。