Suppr超能文献

提高邮寄问卷的回复率:系统评价

Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.

作者信息

Edwards Phil, Roberts Ian, Clarke Mike, DiGuiseppi Carolyn, Pratap Sarah, Wentz Reinhard, Kwan Irene

机构信息

CRASH Trial Co-ordinating Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1B 1DP.

出版信息

BMJ. 2002 May 18;324(7347):1183. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify methods to increase response to postal questionnaires.

DESIGN

Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of any method to influence response to postal questionnaires.

STUDIES REVIEWED

292 randomised controlled trials including 258 315 participants INTERVENTION REVIEWED: 75 strategies for influencing response to postal questionnaires.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The proportion of completed or partially completed questionnaires returned.

RESULTS

The odds of response were more than doubled when a monetary incentive was used (odds ratio 2.02; 95% confidence interval 1.79 to 2.27) and almost doubled when incentives were not conditional on response (1.71; 1.29 to 2.26). Response was more likely when short questionnaires were used (1.86; 1.55 to 2.24). Personalised questionnaires and letters increased response (1.16; 1.06 to 1.28), as did the use of coloured ink (1.39; 1.16 to 1.67). The odds of response were more than doubled when the questionnaires were sent by recorded delivery (2.21; 1.51 to 3.25) and increased when stamped return envelopes were used (1.26; 1.13 to 1.41) and questionnaires were sent by first class post (1.12; 1.02 to 1.23). Contacting participants before sending questionnaires increased response (1.54; 1.24 to 1.92), as did follow up contact (1.44; 1.22 to 1.70) and providing non-respondents with a second copy of the questionnaire (1.41; 1.02 to 1.94). Questionnaires designed to be of more interest to participants were more likely to be returned (2.44; 1.99 to 3.01), but questionnaires containing questions of a sensitive nature were less likely to be returned (0.92; 0.87 to 0.98). Questionnaires originating from universities were more likely to be returned than were questionnaires from other sources, such as commercial organisations (1.31; 1.11 to 1.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Health researchers using postal questionnaires can improve the quality of their research by using the strategies shown to be effective in this systematic review.

摘要

目的

确定提高邮寄问卷调查回复率的方法。

设计

对任何影响邮寄问卷调查回复率的方法进行随机对照试验的系统评价。

纳入研究

292项随机对照试验,包括258315名参与者。

干预措施

75种影响邮寄问卷调查回复率的策略。

主要结局指标

返回的完整或部分完成问卷的比例。

结果

使用金钱激励时回复几率增加一倍多(优势比2.02;95%置信区间1.79至2.27),激励不取决于回复时回复几率几乎翻倍(1.71;1.29至2.26)。使用简短问卷时回复可能性更大(1.86;1.55至2.24)。个性化问卷和信件能提高回复率(1.16;1.06至1.28),使用彩色墨水也有同样效果(1.39;1.16至1.67)。问卷通过挂号信寄送时回复几率增加一倍多(2.21;1.51至3.25),使用贴有邮票的回邮信封(1.26;1.13至1.41)以及问卷通过一类邮件寄送(1.12;1.02至1.23)时回复率也会提高。在发送问卷前联系参与者能提高回复率(1.54;1.24至1.92),后续跟进联系(1.44;1.22至1.70)以及给未回复者提供问卷的第二份副本(1.41;1.02至1.94)也有同样效果。设计得让参与者更感兴趣的问卷更有可能被返回(2.44;1.99至3.01),但包含敏感性质问题的问卷被返回的可能性较小(0.92;0.87至0.98)。来自大学的问卷比来自其他来源(如商业组织)的问卷更有可能被返回(1.31;1.11至1.54)。

结论

使用邮寄问卷的健康研究人员可通过采用本系统评价中显示有效的策略来提高研究质量。

相似文献

2
Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires.提高邮寄问卷调查回复率的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18(2):MR000008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub3.
5
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
6
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
9
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中的溶栓治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(3):CD000213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000213.
10
Pregabalin add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.普瑞巴林添加治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD005612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005612.pub5.

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验