• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定门诊教学场所的教学质量属性:医学教育质量(MedEd IQ)的验证研究

Identifying the attributes of instructional quality in ambulatory teaching sites: a validation study of the MedEd IQ.

作者信息

James Paul A, Kreiter Clarence D, Shipengrover Judith, Crosson Jesse

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242-1097, USA.

出版信息

Fam Med. 2002 Apr;34(4):268-73.

PMID:12017141
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Instructional quality in ambulatory settings may vary. The MedEd IQ is an instrument that measures unique aspects of the clinical instructional process. This study assesses the construct and factorial validity of the MedEd IQ.

METHODS

First-year students (n = 764) in Introduction to Clinical Medicine courses and third-year students (n = 711) in family medicine clerkships evaluated 249 clinical teaching sites affiliated with two medical schools, using MedEd IQ questionnaires at the conclusion of clinical training (1996-2000). Factor structures were identified and relationally defined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic techniques, and a measurement model for assessing instructional quality was refined.

RESULTS

Four unique factors were identified that contribute to instructional quality: preceptor activities, learning environment, learner involvement, and learning opportunities. Of 33 items within the instrument, 22 were retained in the final structural model. Two indices of fit, a comparativefit index of .935, and a root mean square error of approximation of .063 indicated close agreement between the defined model and the observed relationships between items.

CONCLUSIONS

The MedEd IQ measures four factors important to ambulatory medical education and provides a basis for a new measurement approach to assessing instructional quality.

摘要

背景

门诊环境中的教学质量可能存在差异。医学教育智商(MedEd IQ)是一种衡量临床教学过程独特方面的工具。本研究评估了MedEd IQ的结构效度和因子效度。

方法

临床医学导论课程的一年级学生(n = 764)和家庭医学实习的三年级学生(n = 711)在临床培训结束时(1996 - 2000年)使用MedEd IQ问卷对两所医学院附属的249个临床教学点进行了评估。通过探索性和验证性因子分析技术确定因子结构并进行关系定义,完善了评估教学质量的测量模型。

结果

确定了四个有助于教学质量的独特因素:带教老师活动、学习环境、学习者参与度和学习机会。该工具中的33个项目中,22个被保留在最终结构模型中。两个拟合指标,比较拟合指数为0.935,近似均方根误差为0.063,表明定义模型与项目间观察到的关系之间具有高度一致性。

结论

MedEd IQ衡量了对门诊医学教育重要的四个因素,并为评估教学质量的新测量方法提供了基础。

相似文献

1
Identifying the attributes of instructional quality in ambulatory teaching sites: a validation study of the MedEd IQ.确定门诊教学场所的教学质量属性:医学教育质量(MedEd IQ)的验证研究
Fam Med. 2002 Apr;34(4):268-73.
2
A measure of medical instructional quality in ambulatory settings: the MedIQ.
Fam Med. 1999 Apr;31(4):263-9.
3
Defining differences in the instructional styles of community preceptors.界定社区带教教师教学风格的差异。
Fam Med. 2003 Mar;35(3):181-6.
4
Learning environment: the impact of clerkship location on instructional quality.学习环境:临床实习地点对教学质量的影响。
Fam Med. 2013 Mar;45(3):193-6.
5
Exploring instructional quality indicators in ambulatory medical settings: an ethnographic approach.探索门诊医疗环境中的教学质量指标:一种人种志方法。
Fam Med. 1999 Oct;31(9):635-40.
6
Students' perceptions of the instructional quality of district hospital-based training.学生对区级医院培训教学质量的看法。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2016 Jul 7;8(1):e1-6. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v8i1.1028.
7
Early learner perceptions of the attributes of effective preceptors.早期学习者对有效带教老师特质的认知。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Dec;13(5):649-58. doi: 10.1007/s10459-007-9069-z. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
8
North American dental students' perspectives about their clinical education.北美牙科学生对其临床教育的看法。
J Dent Educ. 2006 Apr;70(4):361-77.
9
Practical approaches to a major educational challenge. Training students in the ambulatory setting.应对重大教育挑战的实用方法。在门诊环境中培训学生。
Arch Intern Med. 1995 May 8;155(9):897-904.
10
Observations on the teaching and learning occurring in offices of community-based family and community medicine clerkship preceptors.对社区家庭与社区医学实习带教老师办公室内教学情况的观察
Fam Med. 2004 Feb;36(2):131-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive Relationships Between Students' Evaluation Ratings and Course Satisfaction.学生评价评分与课程满意度之间的预测关系。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Apr;81(3):53. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81353.
2
Students' perceptions of the instructional quality of district hospital-based training.学生对区级医院培训教学质量的看法。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2016 Jul 7;8(1):e1-6. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v8i1.1028.
3
Assessing the quality of clinical teachers: a systematic review of content and quality of questionnaires for assessing clinical teachers.
评估临床教师的质量:评估临床教师的问卷的内容和质量的系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Dec;25(12):1337-45. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1458-y. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
4
Student evaluation of a primary care clerkship: quality assurance and identification of potential for improvement.医学生对基层医疗实习的评价:质量保证与改进潜力识别
BMC Med Educ. 2009 Apr 15;9:17. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-9-17.
5
The current status of medical student education in family medicine.家庭医学领域医学生教育的现状
Ann Fam Med. 2005 Nov-Dec;3(6):559-60. doi: 10.1370/afm/409.
6
Determining the quality of educational climate across multiple undergraduate teaching sites using the DREEM inventory.使用DREEM量表确定多个本科教学地点的教育氛围质量。
BMC Med Educ. 2005 Feb 21;5(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-5-8.