Ladd Alan P, Gomez Gerardo A, Jacobson Lewis E, Broadie Thomas A, Scherer L R, Solotkin Kathleen C
Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine and Wishard Memorial Hospital, Indianapolis 46202, USA.
Am Surg. 2002 May;68(5):421-4.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether 1995 study conclusions influenced patient selection and subsequent survival and whether indications for emergency room thoracotomy (ERT) could be further limited on the basis of patient physiologic status. A retrospective review of patient demographics, physiologic status both at the scene and on arrival to the emergency room (ER), and survival was performed on those who underwent ERT from July 1995 to December 1999. Sixty-five patients underwent ERT for sustained gunshot wounds and 14 patients for stab wounds. There were no survivors from Class I or II at the scene or Class I on presentation to the ER. Although there was a significant decrease in patients of Class I at the scene (27% vs 8%) and in the ER (58.3% vs 35.4%) the overall survival rate remained the same (2.6%). ERT could be eliminated for patients of Class I or II at the scene and for those of Class I on arrival to the ER without negating survivors; survival would improve to 16.2 per cent.
本研究的目的是评估1995年的研究结论是否影响了患者的选择及随后的生存率,以及急诊室开胸手术(ERT)的指征是否可根据患者的生理状态进一步受限。对1995年7月至1999年12月期间接受ERT的患者的人口统计学资料、现场及抵达急诊室(ER)时的生理状态以及生存率进行了回顾性分析。65例患者因持续性枪伤接受ERT,14例患者因刺伤接受ERT。现场或抵达ER时为I级或II级的患者无幸存者。尽管现场I级患者(27%对8%)和ER中I级患者(58.3%对35.4%)显著减少,但总体生存率保持不变(2.6%)。对于现场I级或II级患者以及抵达ER时I级患者,可取消ERT而不影响幸存者;生存率将提高到16.2%。