• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吉米沙星与克拉霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的比较及长期临床疗效

A comparison of gemifloxacin and clarithromycin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and long-term clinical outcomes.

作者信息

Wilson Robert, Schentag Jerome J, Ball Peter, Mandell Lionel

机构信息

Royal Brompton Hospital, London, England.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2002 Apr;24(4):639-52. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)85139-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0149-2918(02)85139-6
PMID:12017408
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gemifloxacin is an enhanced-affinity quinolone with potent activity against lower respiratory tract pathogens.

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy and safety of a 5-day course of gemifloxacin were compared with those of a standard 7-day regimen of clarithromycin in patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). The impact of treatment on the long-term (26 weeks) clinical outcome was also assessed.

METHODS

The acute phase of this randomized, double-blind study was performed in 93 centers in 7 countries. Adult patients (age >40 years) with a history of chronic bronchitis and an Anthonisen type 1 acute exacerbation (increased dyspnea, cough, and sputum purulence) were eligible. Patients receiving systemic steroids at a dose of >10 mg prednisone or the equivalent were excluded. Patients were randomized to receive gemifloxacin 320 mg once daily for 5 days or clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 7 days. Clinical and bacteriologic response rates were assessed at the end-of-therapy visit (days 8-12), the week 2-3 follow-up visit (days 13-24), and the week 4-5 follow-up visit (days 25-38). The long-term phase (26 weeks), which included US and Canadian participants only, evaluated the proportion of patients who remained free of a recurrence of AECB requiring additional antimicrobial therapy after resolution of the initial episode.

RESULTS

Seven hundred twelve patients were randomized to treatment, 351 to gemifloxacin and 361 to clarithromycin. The long-term study included 438 patients, 214 receiving gemifloxacin and 224 receiving clarithromycin. Clinical success rates at the 2-3 week follow-up visit were 85.4% for gemifloxacin and 84.6% for clarithromycin. Bacteriologic success rates were 86.7% for gemifloxacin and 73.1% for clarithromycin. Significantly more patients receiving gemifloxacin than clarithromycin remained free of AECB recurrences (71.0% vs 58.5%, respectively; P = 0.016). Both treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

In the acute treatment of Anthonisen type 1 AECB, a 5-day course of gemifloxacin was at least as effective as a 7-day regimen of clarithromycin. In this population, significantly more patients receiving gemifloxacin remained free of AECB recurrence after 26 weeks compared with those receiving clarithromycin.

摘要

背景

吉米沙星是一种亲和力增强的喹诺酮类药物,对下呼吸道病原体具有强效活性。

目的

比较吉米沙星5天疗程与标准7天克拉霉素疗程治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期(AECB)患者的疗效和安全性。还评估了治疗对长期(26周)临床结局的影响。

方法

这项随机、双盲研究的急性期在7个国家的93个中心进行。入选患者为有慢性支气管炎病史且符合安东尼森1型急性加重(呼吸困难、咳嗽和痰液脓性增加)的成年患者(年龄>40岁)。排除接受剂量>10mg泼尼松或等效剂量全身用类固醇的患者。患者被随机分配接受吉米沙星320mg每日一次,共5天,或克拉霉素500mg每日两次,共7天。在治疗结束访视(第8 - 12天)、第2 - 3周随访访视(第13 - 24天)和第4 - 5周随访访视(第25 - 38天)时评估临床和细菌学反应率。长期阶段(26周)仅包括美国和加拿大的参与者,评估在初始发作缓解后无需额外抗菌治疗的AECB复发患者比例。

结果

712例患者被随机分配接受治疗,351例接受吉米沙星治疗,361例接受克拉霉素治疗。长期研究包括438例患者,214例接受吉米沙星治疗,224例接受克拉霉素治疗。吉米沙星组在第2 - 3周随访时的临床成功率为85.4%,克拉霉素组为84.6%。吉米沙星组的细菌学成功率为86.7%,克拉霉素组为73.1%。接受吉米沙星治疗且无AECB复发的患者明显多于接受克拉霉素治疗的患者(分别为71.0%和58.5%;P = 0.016)。两种治疗耐受性均良好。

结论

在安东尼森1型AECB的急性治疗中,吉米沙星5天疗程至少与克拉霉素7天疗程一样有效。在该人群中,与接受克拉霉素治疗的患者相比,接受吉米沙星治疗的患者在26周后无AECB复发的明显更多。

相似文献

1
A comparison of gemifloxacin and clarithromycin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and long-term clinical outcomes.吉米沙星与克拉霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的比较及长期临床疗效
Clin Ther. 2002 Apr;24(4):639-52. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)85139-6.
2
Cost-effectiveness of gemifloxacin: results from the GLOBE study.吉米沙星的成本效益:全球(GLOBE)研究结果
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002 Jul 15;59(14):1357-65. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/59.14.1357.
3
A randomized, double-blind study comparing 5 days oral gemifloxacin with 7 days oral levofloxacin in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.一项随机、双盲研究,比较口服吉米沙星5天与口服左氧氟沙星7天治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重患者的疗效。
Respir Med. 2004 Aug;98(8):697-707. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.03.028.
4
Gemifloxacin versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The 070 Clinical Study group.吉米沙星与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的疗效比较。070临床研究组。
J Chemother. 2000 Aug;12(4):314-25. doi: 10.1179/joc.2000.12.4.314.
5
Time course of recovery of health status following an infective exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.慢性支气管炎感染性加重后健康状况恢复的时间进程。
Thorax. 2003 Jul;58(7):589-93. doi: 10.1136/thorax.58.7.589.
6
Treating acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in patients unresponsive to previous therapy: sparfloxacin versus clarithromycin.治疗对先前治疗无反应的慢性支气管炎患者的急性细菌性加重:司帕沙星与克拉霉素对比
Clin Ther. 1999 Jun;21(6):954-65. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(99)80017-4.
7
Randomized, double-blind study of short-course (5 day) grepafloxacin versus 10 day clarithromycin in patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.短期(5天)格帕沙星与10天克拉霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的随机双盲研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Oct;44(4):515-23. doi: 10.1093/jac/44.4.515.
8
Efficacy and safety of gemifloxacin 320 mg once-daily for 7 days in the treatment of adult lower respiratory tract infections.每日一次服用320毫克吉米沙星,连续7天治疗成人下呼吸道感染的疗效和安全性。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2001 Jul;18(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(01)00359-4.
9
Efficacy of gemifloxacin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a randomised, double-blind comparison with trovafloxacin.吉米沙星治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的疗效:与曲伐沙星的随机双盲对照研究
J Chemother. 2001 Jun;13(3):288-98. doi: 10.1179/joc.2001.13.3.288.
10
The safety and efficacy of short course (5-day) moxifloxacin vs. azithromycin in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.短期(5天)莫西沙星与阿奇霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重患者的安全性和有效性。
Respir Med. 2000 Nov;94(11):1029-37. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2000.0927.

引用本文的文献

1
Therapeutic Approaches for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重期的治疗方法
Pathogens. 2022 Dec 10;11(12):1513. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11121513.
2
Selected β-, β- and β-Amino Acid Heterocyclic Derivatives and Their Biological Perspective.β-、β-和β-氨基酸杂环衍生物及其生物学视角的选择。
Molecules. 2021 Jan 15;26(2):438. doi: 10.3390/molecules26020438.
3
In vitro activity and pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic parameters of clarithromycin and azithromycin: why they matter in the treatment of respiratory tract infections.
克拉霉素和阿奇霉素的体外活性及药效学/药代动力学参数:它们在呼吸道感染治疗中为何重要。
Infect Drug Resist. 2019 Mar 8;12:585-596. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S187226. eCollection 2019.
4
Management of lower respiratory tract infection in outpatient settings: Focus on clarithromycin.门诊环境下下呼吸道感染的管理:聚焦于克拉霉素
Lung India. 2018 Mar-Apr;35(2):143-149. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_262_17.
5
Network meta-analysis of success rate and safety in antibiotic treatments of bronchitis.支气管炎抗生素治疗成功率和安全性的网状Meta分析
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Aug 9;12:2391-2405. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S139521. eCollection 2017.
6
Clarithromycin versus Gemifloxacin in Quadruple Therapeutic Regimens for Infection Eradication.克拉霉素与吉米沙星在四联治疗方案中根除感染的比较。
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2017 Apr;9(2):100-106. doi: 10.15171/mejdd.2017.58.
7
Fluoroquinolones versus β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitors in Outpatients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Pneumonia: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.氟喹诺酮类药物与β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺炎门诊患者的疗效比较:一项基于全国人口的研究
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 25;10(8):e0136232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136232. eCollection 2015.
8
Efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.莫西沙星治疗慢性支气管炎和 COPD 急性加重期的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thorac Dis. 2014 Mar;6(3):221-9. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.11.12.
9
Macrolides: from in vitro anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties to clinical practice in respiratory diseases.大环内酯类药物:从体外抗炎和免疫调节特性到在呼吸系统疾病中的临床应用。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 May;68(5):479-503. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1161-x. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
10
Clinical effectiveness and safety of gemifloxacin versus cefpodoxime in acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: A randomized, controlled trial.比较吉米沙星与头孢泊肟治疗慢性支气管炎急性发作的临床疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2011 Feb;43(1):40-4. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.75667.