• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性支气管炎感染性加重后健康状况恢复的时间进程。

Time course of recovery of health status following an infective exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

作者信息

Spencer S, Jones P W

机构信息

Department of Physiological Medicine, St George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE, UK.

出版信息

Thorax. 2003 Jul;58(7):589-93. doi: 10.1136/thorax.58.7.589.

DOI:10.1136/thorax.58.7.589
PMID:12832673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1746751/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The magnitude and time course of effect of an acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) on health status are not known. Data from the GLOBE study, a randomised double blind trial of antibiotic therapy, were used to investigate these effects.

METHODS

438 patients with AECB received either gemifloxacin 320 mg once daily for 5 days (214 patients) or clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 7 days (224 patients) and were followed up for 26 weeks. St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores were obtained at baseline and after 4, 12, and 26 weeks.

RESULTS

At presentation during an exacerbation SGRQ scores were worse (Total score difference 5.4 units, 95% CI 1.9 to 8.8, p=0.002) in patients who had a subsequent exacerbation during follow up. The greatest improvement in SGRQ score occurred within the first 4 weeks (mean 8.9 units, 95% CI 6.5 to 11.5, p<0.0001). Subsequently, scores improved more rapidly in patients with no further exacerbations. At 26 weeks the difference between the two groups was 9.6 units (95% CI 5.7 to 13.4, p<0.0001). In patients with no further exacerbations the SGRQ score improved between 4 and 12 weeks by a further 4.1 units (95% CI 2.2 to 5.9, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

A single infective AECB has a sustained effect on health status. The recovery period is long even in patients who have no further exacerbations. A second episode within 6 months limits recovery markedly. Treatments that reduce exacerbation frequency could have a significant impact on health status.

摘要

背景

慢性支气管炎急性加重(AECB)对健康状况影响的程度和时间进程尚不清楚。全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)纵向研究(GLOBE)的数据,一项抗生素治疗的随机双盲试验,被用于研究这些影响。

方法

438例AECB患者接受每日一次320mg吉米沙星治疗5天(214例患者)或每日两次500mg克拉霉素治疗7天(224例患者),并随访26周。在基线以及4、12和26周后获得圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分。

结果

在随访期间出现再次加重的患者中,加重期就诊时SGRQ评分更差(总分差异5.4分,95%CI 1.9至8.8,p = 0.002)。SGRQ评分的最大改善发生在最初4周内(平均8.9分,95%CI 6.5至11.5,p<0.0001)。随后,无进一步加重的患者评分改善更快。在26周时,两组之间的差异为9.6分(95%CI 5.7至13.4,p<0.0001)。在无进一步加重的患者中,SGRQ评分在4至12周间进一步改善4.1分(95%CI 2.2至5.9,p<0.0001)。

结论

单次感染性AECB对健康状况有持续影响。即使是没有进一步加重的患者,恢复期也很长。6个月内的第二次发作会明显限制恢复。减少加重频率的治疗可能对健康状况有重大影响。

相似文献

1
Time course of recovery of health status following an infective exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.慢性支气管炎感染性加重后健康状况恢复的时间进程。
Thorax. 2003 Jul;58(7):589-93. doi: 10.1136/thorax.58.7.589.
2
A comparison of gemifloxacin and clarithromycin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and long-term clinical outcomes.吉米沙星与克拉霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的比较及长期临床疗效
Clin Ther. 2002 Apr;24(4):639-52. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)85139-6.
3
Cost-effectiveness of gemifloxacin: results from the GLOBE study.吉米沙星的成本效益:全球(GLOBE)研究结果
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002 Jul 15;59(14):1357-65. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/59.14.1357.
4
A randomized, double-blind study comparing 5 days oral gemifloxacin with 7 days oral levofloxacin in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.一项随机、双盲研究,比较口服吉米沙星5天与口服左氧氟沙星7天治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重患者的疗效。
Respir Med. 2004 Aug;98(8):697-707. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.03.028.
5
Gemifloxacin versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The 070 Clinical Study group.吉米沙星与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的疗效比较。070临床研究组。
J Chemother. 2000 Aug;12(4):314-25. doi: 10.1179/joc.2000.12.4.314.
6
Oral gemifloxacin once daily for 5 days compared with sequential therapy with i.v. ceftriaxone/oral cefuroxime (maximum of 10 days) in the treatment of hospitalized patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.口服吉米沙星每日一次,疗程5天,与静脉注射头孢曲松/口服头孢呋辛序贯治疗(最长10天)用于治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的住院患者的比较。
Respir Med. 2003 Mar;97(3):242-9. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2003.1435.
7
The safety and efficacy of short course (5-day) moxifloxacin vs. azithromycin in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.短期(5天)莫西沙星与阿奇霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重患者的安全性和有效性。
Respir Med. 2000 Nov;94(11):1029-37. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2000.0927.
8
Efficacy of gemifloxacin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a randomised, double-blind comparison with trovafloxacin.吉米沙星治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的疗效:与曲伐沙星的随机双盲对照研究
J Chemother. 2001 Jun;13(3):288-98. doi: 10.1179/joc.2001.13.3.288.
9
Efficacy and safety of gemifloxacin 320 mg once-daily for 7 days in the treatment of adult lower respiratory tract infections.每日一次服用320毫克吉米沙星,连续7天治疗成人下呼吸道感染的疗效和安全性。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2001 Jul;18(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(01)00359-4.
10
Short-course moxifloxacin therapy for treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The Bronchitis Study Group.短程莫西沙星治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染。支气管炎研究组。
Respir Med. 2000 Jan;94(1):18-27. doi: 10.1053/rmed.1999.0708.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world effectiveness study of guideline-directed COPD STANDARDized management in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cluster randomised trial design.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中指南指导的慢性阻塞性肺疾病标准化管理的真实世界有效性研究:一项整群随机试验设计
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Jul 7;12(1):e002768. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002768.
2
Body Mass Index and Lung Function in Hospitalized Severe AECOPD Patients: Investigating Nonlinear Associations and the Role of Hemoglobin.住院严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者的体重指数与肺功能:探究非线性关联及血红蛋白的作用
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025 May 1;20:1309-1320. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S521112. eCollection 2025.
3
Factors associated with undiagnosed COPD in patients hospitalised for severe COPD exacerbation.与因严重 COPD 加重而住院的患者中未被诊断的 COPD 相关的因素。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 Nov 28;11(1):e002620. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002620.
4
Monocyte distribution width (MDW) and DECAF: two simple tools to determine the prognosis of severe COPD exacerbation.单核细胞分布宽度(MDW)与DECAF:两种用于判定重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期预后的简易工具。
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;19(6):1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03632-5. Epub 2024 May 9.
5
Health Status Progression Measured Using Weekly Telemonitoring of COPD Assessment Test Scores Over 1 Year and Its Association With COPD Exacerbations.使用慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试(COPD Assessment Test)分数的每周远程监测对健康状况进展进行为期1年的测量及其与慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重的关联
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2024 Mar 26;11(2):144-154. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0415.
6
Association of blood cadmium concentration with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease progression: a prospective cohort study.血液镉浓度与慢性阻塞性肺疾病进展的关系:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Respir Res. 2024 Feb 17;25(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02726-0.
7
Sputum microbiome α-diversity is a key feature of the COPD frequent exacerbator phenotype.痰液微生物群的α多样性是慢性阻塞性肺疾病频繁急性加重表型的一个关键特征。
ERJ Open Res. 2024 Feb 5;10(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00595-2023. eCollection 2024 Jan.
8
Alterations in circulating mitochondrial signals at hospital admission for COPD exacerbation.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)加重住院时循环线粒体信号的改变。
Chron Respir Dis. 2023 Jan-Dec;20:14799731231220058. doi: 10.1177/14799731231220058.
9
A systematic review of exercise studies for individuals hospitalized with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Focus on the principles of exercise training.一项针对因慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重而住院的个体的运动研究的系统评价:关注运动训练的原则。
Chron Respir Dis. 2023 Jan-Dec;20:14799731231215363. doi: 10.1177/14799731231215363.
10
Automatically Explaining Machine Learning Predictions on Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations: Retrospective Cohort Study.自动解释机器学习对严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重的预测:回顾性队列研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Feb 25;10(2):e33043. doi: 10.2196/33043.

本文引用的文献

1
Disease severity and the effect of fluticasone propionate on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations.疾病严重程度及丙酸氟替卡松对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重的影响。
Eur Respir J. 2003 Jan;21(1):68-73. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00013303.
2
Relationship between exacerbation frequency and lung function decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重频率与肺功能下降之间的关系。
Thorax. 2002 Oct;57(10):847-52. doi: 10.1136/thorax.57.10.847.
3
Cost-effectiveness of gemifloxacin: results from the GLOBE study.吉米沙星的成本效益:全球(GLOBE)研究结果
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002 Jul 15;59(14):1357-65. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/59.14.1357.
4
A comparison of gemifloxacin and clarithromycin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and long-term clinical outcomes.吉米沙星与克拉霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的比较及长期临床疗效
Clin Ther. 2002 Apr;24(4):639-52. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)85139-6.
5
Interpretation of quality of life scores from the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire.圣乔治呼吸问卷生活质量评分的解读
Eur Respir J. 2002 Mar;19(3):405-13. doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.00213202.
6
Interpreting thresholds for a clinically significant change in health status in asthma and COPD.解读哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)健康状况临床显著变化的阈值
Eur Respir J. 2002 Mar;19(3):398-404. doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.00063702.
7
Health status measurement in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的健康状况测量
Thorax. 2001 Nov;56(11):880-7. doi: 10.1136/thorax.56.11.880.
8
Health status deterioration in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的健康状况恶化
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Jan;163(1):122-8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.1.2005009.
9
Time course and recovery of exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者病情加重的时间进程及恢复情况
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 May;161(5):1608-13. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9908022.
10
Increased airway responsiveness to acetaldehyde in asthmatic subjects with alcohol-induced bronchoconstriction.酒精诱导支气管收缩的哮喘患者对乙醛的气道反应性增加。
Eur Respir J. 1999 Jul;14(1):19-22. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14a05.x.