Ericsson M, Poston W S C, Linder Jürgen, Taylor Jennifer E, Haddock C Keith, Foreyt John P
The Swedish National Social Insurance Hospital, Nynäshamn.
Disabil Rehabil. 2002 Apr 15;24(6):334-40. doi: 10.1080/09638280110096241.
Investigators have examined factors that predict treatment outcome and disability status in chronic pain patients, including psychopathology and personality characteristics with equivocal results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of personality characteristics, depression, and personality disorders in predicting disability status in pain patients with long-term follow-up. The setting was a rehabilitation hospital in Southern Sweden.
Subjects were 184 pain patients (mean age = 43.4 (10.8) years; 72.8% female) who had no more than 365 sick leave days (Mean sick leave days = 132.7 (128.2)) prior to the baseline personality and psychiatric evaluation. The baseline evaluation consisted of a psychiatric interview that included the administration of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Screen Questionnaire (SCID-II), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the Karolinska Scales of Personality (KSP). Disability status was assessed by insurance record review a minimum of two-and-a-half years after baseline evaluation.
Multivariate logistic regression suggests that age (OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.02-1.18; p = 0.013), number of sick leave days prior to evaluation (OR= 1.01, 95% CI= 1.01-1.02; p = 0.018), and baseline diagnosis of depression significantly predicted subsequent disability status (OR = 7.04, 95% CI = 1.15-42.93; p = 0.034). Baseline personality traits and the diagnosis of a personality disorder were not useful predictors of disability status in our sample.
These data suggest that depression, but not personality disorders characteristics, was an important disability predictor in chronic pain patients with extended follow-up.
研究人员已对预测慢性疼痛患者治疗结果和残疾状况的因素进行了调查,包括精神病理学和人格特征,但结果并不明确。本研究的目的是评估人格特征、抑郁和人格障碍在长期随访的疼痛患者中预测残疾状况的有用性。研究地点为瑞典南部的一家康复医院。
研究对象为184名疼痛患者(平均年龄=43.4(10.8)岁;72.8%为女性),在进行基线人格和精神评估之前,他们的病假天数不超过365天(平均病假天数=132.7(128.2))。基线评估包括一次精神科访谈,其中包括使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版筛查问卷的结构化临床访谈(SCID-II)、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)和卡罗林斯卡人格量表(KSP)。在基线评估至少两年半后,通过保险记录审查来评估残疾状况。
多因素逻辑回归分析表明,年龄(比值比=1.09,95%置信区间=1.02-1.18;p=0.013)、评估前的病假天数(比值比=1.01,95%置信区间=1.01-1.02;p=0.018)以及基线时的抑郁诊断显著预测了随后的残疾状况(比值比=7.04,95%置信区间=1.15-42.93;p=0.034)。在我们的样本中,基线人格特质和人格障碍诊断并不是残疾状况的有用预测指标。
这些数据表明,在进行长期随访的慢性疼痛患者中,抑郁而非人格障碍特征是残疾状况的重要预测指标。