Joly Véronique, Flandre Philippe, Meiffredy Vincent, Brun-Vezinet Françoise, Gastaut Jean-Albert, Goujard Cécile, Remy Gérard, Descamps Diane, Ruffault Annick, Certain Agnès, Aboulker Jean-Pierre, Yeni Patrick
Agence Française de Recherche sur le SIDA, Paris, France.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Jun;46(6):1906-13. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.6.1906-1913.2002.
We compared the efficacy and the toxicity of zidovudine (AZT) versus stavudine (d4T), in combination with lamivudine (3TC) and indinavir, in AZT-, dideoxyinosine (ddI)-, and/or dideoxycytosine (ddC)-experienced patients in a randomized comparative multicenter trial. One hundred seventy human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients, who had received AZT, ddI, and/or ddC for at least 6 months but were naive for d4T, 3TC, and protease inhibitors, were randomized to AZT at 250 to 300 mg twice daily, 3TC at 150 mg twice daily, and indinavir at 800 mg every 8 h or to d4T at 40 mg twice daily, 3TC at 150 mg twice daily, and indinavir at 800 mg every 8 h. The primary endpoint was time to virological failure, defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA levels of >5,000 copies/ml after at least 8 weeks of antiretroviral therapy. Additional endpoints were change from baseline in CD4 cell counts, AIDS-defining events and adverse events, and proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels of <500 copies/ml and HIV-1 RNA levels of <50 copies/ml. At week 80, 15 patients in the AZT arm and 14 patients in the d4T arm had reached the primary endpoint, and time to virological failure did not differ between the two arms (P = 0.98). In the d4T and in the AZT arms, 67 and 73% of patients, respectively, had HIV-1 RNA levels of <500 copies/ml (P = 0.50). The median change from baseline in CD4 cell count was 195 x 10(6) and 175 x 10(6)/liter for the d4T- and AZT-containing arms, respectively. The proportions of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels of <50 copies/ml at weeks 8, 16, and 24 were similar in the two arms. The occurrence of serious adverse events was not significantly different between arms. In conclusion, in these patients heavily pretreated with AZT, switching from AZT to d4T when initiating indinavir and 3TC did not bring any additional benefit compared to maintaining AZT.
在一项随机对照多中心试验中,我们比较了齐多夫定(AZT)与司他夫定(d4T)联合拉米夫定(3TC)和茚地那韦,在既往接受过AZT、去羟肌苷(ddI)和/或双脱氧胞苷(ddC)治疗的患者中的疗效和毒性。170例感染人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)的患者,曾接受AZT、ddI和/或ddC治疗至少6个月,但未曾使用过d4T、3TC和蛋白酶抑制剂,被随机分为两组,一组接受每日2次、每次250至300mg的AZT,每日2次、每次150mg的3TC,以及每8小时800mg的茚地那韦;另一组接受每日2次、每次40mg的d4T,每日2次、每次150mg的3TC,以及每8小时800mg的茚地那韦。主要终点是病毒学失败时间,定义为抗逆转录病毒治疗至少8周后血浆HIV-1 RNA水平>5000拷贝/ml。其他终点包括CD4细胞计数相对于基线的变化、艾滋病定义事件和不良事件,以及HIV-1 RNA水平<500拷贝/ml和<50拷贝/ml的患者比例。在第80周时,AZT组有15例患者、d4T组有14例患者达到主要终点,两组的病毒学失败时间无差异(P = 0.98)。在d4T组和AZT组中,分别有67%和73%的患者HIV-1 RNA水平<500拷贝/ml(P = 0.50)。含d4T组和含AZT组CD4细胞计数相对于基线的中位数变化分别为195×10⁶/L和175×10⁶/L。在第8周、16周和24周时,两组中HIV-1 RNA水平<50拷贝/ml的患者比例相似。两组严重不良事件的发生率无显著差异。总之,在这些接受过大量AZT治疗的患者中,开始使用茚地那韦和3TC时从AZT转换为d4T与继续使用AZT相比,并未带来任何额外益处。