French Martyn, Amin Janaki, Roth Norman, Carr Andrew, Law Matthew, Emery Sean, Drummond Fraser, Cooper David
Department of Clinical Immunology and Biochemical Genetics, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
HIV Clin Trials. 2002 May-Jun;3(3):177-85. doi: 10.1310/9n21-1hg1-7n1q-jkw1.
To assess and compare the efficacy and safety of three triple combination antiretroviral therapies in HIV-1-infected treatment-naive patients.
Seventy treatment-naive HIV-infected adults with CD4+ T-cell counts >50/microL were randomized to receive either zidovudine + lamivudine + nevirapine (AZT + 3TC + NVP), stavudine + didanosine + nevirapine (d4T+ddI+NVP), or stavudine + lamivudine + nevirapine (d4T+3TC+NVP) for 52 weeks. Patient assessments were conducted monthly and included measurement of plasma HIV RNA levels and CD4+ T-cell counts and evaluations for drug toxicity.
The mean time-weighted reductions in plasma HIV RNA in the AZT+3TC+NVP, d4T+3TC+NVP, and d4T+ddI+NVP groups were 1.29, 2.13, and 1.78 log(10) copies/mL, respectively (p =.389). The proportions of patients with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL in the AZT+3TC+NVP, d4T+3TC+NVP, and d4T+ddI+NVP groups were 73%, 68%, and 80%, respectively (p =.71). The mean time-weighted increases in CD4+ T-cell counts in the AZT+3TC+NVP, d4T+3TC+NVP, and d4T+ddI+NVP groups were 139, 113, and 174 cells/microL, respectively (p =.30). Three patients ceased assigned treatment due to rash (one from each treatment arm), and 5 of the 45 patients on d4T (3 from the d4T+3TC+NVP arm and 2 from the d4T+ddI+NVP arm) ceased assigned treatment due to neuropathy.
All three-drug combinations were equally effective at suppressing viral load and increasing CD4+ T-cell counts. No significant differences were detected between the treatment groups in virological or immunological response or cessation of study drugs due to adverse events, although it is possible that the study was underpowered to detect differences. NVP was safe and efficacious in this setting, and efficacy was not influenced by nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone.
评估并比较三种三联抗逆转录病毒疗法在初治的HIV-1感染患者中的疗效和安全性。
70例CD4+ T细胞计数>50/微升的初治HIV感染成人被随机分为三组,分别接受齐多夫定+拉米夫定+奈韦拉平(AZT + 3TC + NVP)、司他夫定+去羟肌苷+奈韦拉平(d4T + ddI + NVP)或司他夫定+拉米夫定+奈韦拉平(d4T + 3TC + NVP)治疗52周。每月对患者进行评估,包括检测血浆HIV RNA水平、CD4+ T细胞计数以及评估药物毒性。
AZT + 3TC + NVP组、d4T + 3TC + NVP组和d4T + ddI + NVP组血浆HIV RNA的平均时间加权降低值分别为1.29、2.13和1.78 log(10)拷贝/毫升(p = 0.389)。AZT + 3TC + NVP组、d4T + 3TC + NVP组和d4T + ddI + NVP组中HIV RNA<50拷贝/毫升的患者比例分别为73%、68%和80%(p = 0.71)。AZT + 3TC + NVP组、d4T + 3TC + NVP组和d4T + ddI + NVP组CD4+ T细胞计数的平均时间加权增加值分别为139、113和174个/微升(p = 0.30)。3例患者因皮疹停止指定治疗(每个治疗组各1例),45例接受d4T治疗的患者中有5例(3例来自d4T + 3TC + NVP组,2例来自d4T + ddI + NVP组)因神经病变停止指定治疗。
所有三种药物组合在抑制病毒载量和增加CD4+ T细胞计数方面同样有效。在病毒学或免疫学反应或因不良事件停止研究药物方面,治疗组之间未检测到显著差异,尽管该研究可能因检验效能不足而无法检测到差异。在这种情况下,奈韦拉平是安全有效的,且疗效不受核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂主干药物的影响。