• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性和复发性阑尾炎:单组5年经验的回顾性分析

Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute and recurrent appendicitis: retrospective analysis of a single-group 5-year experience.

作者信息

Fogli Luciano, Brulatti Mauro, Boschi Sergio, Di Domenico Marco, Papa Vito, Patrizi Patrizio, Capizzi Francesco Domenico

机构信息

Divisione di Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2002 Apr;12(2):107-10. doi: 10.1089/10926420252939619.

DOI:10.1089/10926420252939619
PMID:12019568
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Twenty years after the first report of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), its role in the treatment of appendicitis is still under debate. We report herein a retrospective analysis of our cases of LA in the last 5 years, during which we adopted a policy of an almost uniform laparoscopic approach on a rather selected population composed mainly of women with acute or recurrent lower quadrant abdominal pain.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed on 33 male and 98 female patients. The mean age at operation was 25.7+/-11.4 years (range 11-59 years). Acute appendicitis with localized or diffuse peritonitis was present in 34 cases. In the remaining 97 patients, the operation was performed for acute or recurring symptoms of lower quadrant abdominal pain.

RESULTS

There were no conversions to open surgery. The operating time was 45+/-17 minutes (range 30-110 minutes). The pathology examination of the removed appendices showed acute appendicitis in 34 cases and chronic inflammation in the remaining 97 patients. In one case, histology revealed a coexisting mucinous carcinoid that extended to the perivisceral fat, and a completion right hemicolectomy was performed. Complications were minor in most cases. Reoperation for deep abdominal abscess or hematoma was required in three cases. The mean hospital stay was 2.59+/-1.58 days (range 24 hours-11 days).

CONCLUSION

In our hands, LA has proven to be safe and effective. The laparoscopic operation has significant advantages in terms of lower invasiveness and better diagnostic capability. It is especially useful in women of child-bearing age, in whom it may be considered the procedure of choice.

摘要

背景与目的

在腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)首次报道20年后,其在阑尾炎治疗中的作用仍存在争议。我们在此报告对过去5年中LA病例的回顾性分析,在此期间,我们对主要由患有急性或复发性下腹部疼痛的女性组成的特定人群采取了几乎统一的腹腔镜手术方法。

患者与方法

对33例男性和98例女性患者实施了腹腔镜阑尾切除术。手术时的平均年龄为25.7±11.4岁(范围11 - 59岁)。34例患者存在伴有局限性或弥漫性腹膜炎的急性阑尾炎。其余97例患者因下腹部疼痛的急性或复发症状接受手术。

结果

无转为开放手术的情况。手术时间为45±17分钟(范围30 - 110分钟)。切除阑尾的病理检查显示34例为急性阑尾炎,其余97例为慢性炎症。1例组织学检查发现并存黏液性类癌并累及内脏周围脂肪,遂行右半结肠根治性切除术。大多数情况下并发症轻微。3例患者因深部腹腔脓肿或血肿需再次手术。平均住院时间为2.59±1.58天(范围24小时 - 11天)。

结论

在我们手中,LA已被证明是安全有效的。腹腔镜手术在微创性和更好的诊断能力方面具有显著优势。它对育龄女性尤其有用,可被视为首选手术方式。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute and recurrent appendicitis: retrospective analysis of a single-group 5-year experience.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性和复发性阑尾炎:单组5年经验的回顾性分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2002 Apr;12(2):107-10. doi: 10.1089/10926420252939619.
2
[Laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Critical review of the literature and personal experience].[腹腔镜或开放性阑尾切除术。文献综述与个人经验]
G Chir. 2001 Oct;22(10):353-7.
3
Laparoscopic appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis: is it safe and justified?: A retrospective analysis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎:是否安全且合理?一项回顾性分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Jun;21(3):142-5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31821ad770.
4
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017.
5
[Laparoscopic approach in acute appendicitis: experience with 501 consecutive cases].[急性阑尾炎的腹腔镜手术方法:501例连续病例的经验]
Chir Ital. 2009 May-Jun;61(3):327-35.
6
[Appendicectomy: laparoscopic or ''open approach''?].[阑尾切除术:腹腔镜手术还是“开放手术”?]
Minerva Chir. 2005 Feb;60(1):47-54.
7
Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy: retrospective assessment of 200 patients.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术:200例患者的回顾性评估
Can J Surg. 1995 Apr;38(2):178-82.
8
[Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in suspected acute appendicitis in female patients].[女性疑似急性阑尾炎患者的腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术对比]
Ann Ital Chir. 2002 Jan-Feb;73(1):59-63.
9
Laparoscopic appendectomies: results of a monocentric prospective and non-randomized study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术:一项单中心前瞻性非随机研究的结果
Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Jun;54(76):1146-52.
10
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli hospital.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:以色列一家医院的回顾性比较结果
Isr Med Assoc J. 2002 Feb;4(2):91-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes and cost-effectiveness.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:一项评估结局和成本效益的回顾性队列研究
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Aug 30;11(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0102-5. eCollection 2016.
2
SAGES guideline for laparoscopic appendectomy.SAGES腹腔镜阑尾切除术指南。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Apr;24(4):757-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0632-y. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
3
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which way to go?腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术:该如何选择?
World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Aug 21;14(31):4909-14. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.4909.