Suppr超能文献

喇叭口型主-髂动脉腔内移植物:一种保留盆腔血流的替代方案。

Bell-bottom aortoiliac endografts: an alternative that preserves pelvic blood flow.

作者信息

Kritpracha Boonprasit, Pigott John P, Russell Todd E, Corbey Mary Jo, Whalen Ralph C, DiSalle Robert S, Price Charles I, Sproat Ian A, Beebe Hugh G

机构信息

Jobst Vascular Center, 2109 Hughes Drive, Suite 400, Toledo, OH 43606, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2002 May;35(5):874-81. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.123326.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Dilated common iliac arteries that complicate aortic aneurysm stent grafting usually have been managed with endograft extension across the iliac artery bifurcation with internal iliac artery (IIA) occlusion. We studied 25 patients with significant common iliac artery (CIA) dilation treated with two methods: endograft extension across the iliac bifurcation or a new approach with a flared cuff within the CIA that preserves the IIA.

METHODS

Of 86 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) who underwent bifurcated endovascular stent grafting (ESG), 25 (29.1%) had at least one dilated CIA. Two treatment groups had different methods of management of iliac artery dilation. Group 1 underwent ESG with straight extension across the iliac bifurcation and IIA coil embolization before the ESG procedure (n = 2) or simultaneously with ESG (n = 8). Group 2 underwent ESG with flared distal cuff (AneuRx, Medtronic AVE, Santa Rosa, Calif) contained within the CIA, the so-called "bell-bottom" procedure, thus preserving the IIA (n = 15). Iliac artery dimensions, operating room time, fluoroscopy time, and postoperative complications were prospectively gathered.

RESULTS

Two women and 23 men had mean diameters of AAA of 56.6 mm (range, 38 to 98 mm) and of CIA of 21.4 mm (range, 15 to 48 mm). The diameters of CIA treated with device extension into external iliac artery after IIA coil embolization in group 1 and with the bell-bottom procedure in group 2 were not different (mean CIA diameter, 19.9 mm; range, 15 to 26 mm; and mean, 19.1 mm; range, 15 to 24 mm; respectively). However, significantly lower operating room and catheter procedure times were found in group 2 compared with group 1 (137 versus 192 minutes; 58 versus 106 minutes; P =.02 and.02, respectively). No periprocedural type I endoleaks were found in either group. Nine patients in group 2 also had a second contralateral CIA aneurysm, and five patients (mean CIA diameter, 33.0 mm; range, 22 to 48 mm) underwent treatment with extension across the iliac artery bifurcation and IIA occlusion. Use of the bell-bottom procedure on the other side allowed preservation of one IIA. Four cases (mean diameter, 19.3 mm) also underwent contralateral bell-bottom procedure. Two of these group 2 patients had complications, with severe buttock claudication in one and distal embolism necessitating limb salvage bypass after preoperative coil embolization of the IIA in another.

CONCLUSION

Significant CIA ectasia or small aneurysm is often associated with AAA. In such cases, the bell-bottom procedure that preserves IIA circulation is a new alternative to the common practice of placement of endograft extensions across the iliac artery bifurcation in patients with at least one CIA diameter of less than 26 mm. Additional benefits include reduced total procedure time. Early technical success appears to justify continued use. However, long-term evaluation is necessary to determine durability because the risk of rupture as the result of potential expansion of the excluded iliac artery or late failure is unknown.

摘要

目的

使主动脉瘤支架植入术变得复杂的髂总动脉扩张通常采用带膜支架跨越髂动脉分叉并闭塞髂内动脉来处理。我们研究了25例采用两种方法治疗的显著髂总动脉(CIA)扩张患者:带膜支架跨越髂动脉分叉或在CIA内采用一种保留髂内动脉的喇叭形套管的新方法。

方法

在86例行分叉型血管内支架植入术(ESG)的腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者中,25例(29.1%)至少有一侧CIA扩张。两个治疗组对髂动脉扩张采用不同的处理方法。第1组在ESG术前(n = 2)或与ESG同时(n = 8)行ESG并带膜支架直接跨越髂动脉分叉及髂内动脉弹簧圈栓塞。第2组行ESG并在CIA内置入喇叭形远端套管(美敦力AVE公司的AneuRx,加利福尼亚州圣罗莎),即所谓的“喇叭裤管”手术,从而保留髂内动脉(n = 15)。前瞻性收集髂动脉尺寸、手术时间、透视时间和术后并发症。

结果

2例女性和23例男性,AAA平均直径为56.6 mm(范围38至98 mm),CIA平均直径为21.4 mm(范围15至48 mm)。第1组髂内动脉弹簧圈栓塞后带膜支架延伸至髂外动脉治疗的CIA直径与第2组采用“喇叭裤管”手术治疗的CIA直径无差异(CIA平均直径分别为19.9 mm,范围15至26 mm;和19.1 mm,范围15至24 mm)。然而,与第1组相比,第2组的手术时间和导管操作时间显著缩短(分别为137分钟对192分钟;58分钟对106分钟;P值分别为0.02和0.02)。两组均未发现围手术期I型内漏。第2组9例患者还患有对侧CIA动脉瘤,5例患者(CIA平均直径33.0 mm,范围22至48 mm)采用带膜支架跨越髂动脉分叉并闭塞髂内动脉治疗。对侧采用“喇叭裤管”手术可保留一条髂内动脉。4例患者(平均直径19.3 mm)也接受了对侧“喇叭裤管”手术。第2组2例患者出现并发症,1例出现严重臀部跛行,另1例在术前髂内动脉弹簧圈栓塞后发生远端栓塞,需要行肢体挽救性旁路手术。

结论

显著的CIA扩张或小动脉瘤常与AAA相关。在这种情况下,对于至少一侧CIA直径小于26 mm的患者,保留髂内动脉循环的“喇叭裤管”手术是一种替代常规带膜支架跨越髂动脉分叉植入的新方法。额外的益处包括缩短总手术时间。早期技术成功似乎证明可继续使用。然而,由于被排除的髂动脉潜在扩张或晚期失败导致破裂的风险未知,因此需要进行长期评估以确定其耐久性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验