Suppr超能文献

电视胸腔镜下心包内肺血管检查在识别可切除临床T4期肺癌中的应用价值

Usefulness of videothoracoscopic intrapericardial examination of pulmonary vessels to identify resectable clinical T4 lung cancer.

作者信息

Loscertales Jesús, Jiménez-Merchán Rafael, Congregado-Loscertales Miguel, Arenas-Linares Carlos, Girón-Arjona Juan Carlos, Tristan Andrés Arroyo, Ayarra Javier

机构信息

Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 May;73(5):1563-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03396-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Discrepancies in predicting resectability by imaging techniques (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) compared with actual intraoperative findings have persuaded us to perform systematic exploratory videothoracoscopy (EVT) as the first step in the surgical evaluation of patients with lung cancer. Resectability of centrally located primary tumors with intrapericardial extension (clinical T4), however, can be established only by direct examination of the pericardial sac contents. Therefore, in these instances, videopericardioscopy (VPC) has been added to our protocol.

METHODS

From April 1993 to December 2000, members of our department used EVT to assess 620 patients with lung cancer. Of them, 27 patients, 25 men and 2 women, were seen with pericardial tumor extension. The mean age of the group was 62 years (range, 41 to 77 years). To be properly evaluated, these patients underwent VPC. We used three and, occasionally, four incisions to perform EVT. The same incisions were used to enter the pericardial cavity during VPC.

RESULTS

In 15 of the 27 patients, hilar and vascular invasion was correctly predicted by imaging techniques. The other 12, however, were correctly staged only during EVT. The tumor was deemed unresectable by VPC in 6 patients (5 with invasion at the origin of the pulmonary artery and 1 with involvement of the left inferior pulmonary vein and left atrium), and exploratory thoracotomy was obviated. There was no morbidity or mortality in these 6 patients, and their mean length of hospital stay was 48 hours. The remaining 21 patients underwent thoracotomy and intrapericardial lung resection. Six of them had been considered to have unresectable disease on the basis of computed tomographic findings or magnetic resonance imaging studies. An average of 22 minutes (range, 16 to 33 minutes) was added to the operation when VPC was used.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that EVT is superior to imaging techniques (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging) in detecting tumor extension into the pericardium. In addition, short of an exploratory thoracotomy, VPC seems to be the most definitive study to establish resectability of centrally located tumors with pericardial invasion. Unnecessary exploratory thoracotomies can thus be avoided.

摘要

背景

与实际术中所见相比,成像技术(计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像)在预测可切除性方面存在差异,这促使我们将系统性探索性电视胸腔镜检查(EVT)作为肺癌患者手术评估的第一步。然而,对于伴有心包内侵犯的中央型原发性肿瘤(临床T4),其可切除性只能通过直接检查心包腔内容物来确定。因此,在这些情况下,我们在方案中增加了电视心包镜检查(VPC)。

方法

1993年4月至2000年12月,我们科室成员使用EVT评估了620例肺癌患者。其中,27例患者(25例男性,2例女性)出现心包肿瘤侵犯。该组患者的平均年龄为62岁(范围41至77岁)。为了进行恰当评估,这些患者接受了VPC。我们使用三个切口,偶尔使用四个切口进行EVT。在VPC期间,使用相同的切口进入心包腔。

结果

27例患者中,15例通过成像技术正确预测了肺门和血管侵犯。然而,另外12例仅在EVT期间才得到正确分期。VPC判定6例患者肿瘤无法切除(5例肺动脉起始处侵犯,1例左下肺静脉和左心房受累),从而避免了开胸探查。这6例患者无并发症或死亡,平均住院时间为48小时。其余21例患者接受了开胸手术和心包内肺切除术。其中6例基于计算机断层扫描结果或磁共振成像研究曾被认为疾病无法切除。使用VPC时,手术平均增加了22分钟(范围16至33分钟)。

结论

本研究表明,在检测肿瘤侵犯心包方面,EVT优于成像技术(计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像)。此外,除了开胸探查外,VPC似乎是确定伴有心包侵犯的中央型肿瘤可切除性的最确切检查。因此,可以避免不必要的开胸探查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验