• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用单瓶粘结系统时三种修复材料与乳牙牙本质的体外粘结效果。

In vitro bonding efficacy of three restorative materials to primary dentin using a one-bottle adhesive system.

作者信息

Baghdadi Z D

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry at Damascus University School of Dentistry.

出版信息

Gen Dent. 2001 Nov-Dec;49(6):624-31; quiz 632-3.

PMID:12024752
Abstract

The shear bond strength to primary dentin of a new single-bottle adhesive with three restorative materials (composite resin, compomer, and amalgam) was evaluated. Statistical analysis of the data showed significant differences among the means of the groups (ANOVA, p < 0.05). Composite resin and compomer were not significantly different from each other but both were statistically higher than amalgam. The fracture mode was not related to the shear bond strength values. The mean shear bond strengths obtained in this study were statistically comparable to those obtained in a previous study which used the same experimental design but included permanent teeth.

摘要

评估了一种新型单瓶装粘合剂与三种修复材料(复合树脂、复合体和银汞合金)对乳牙本质的剪切粘结强度。数据的统计分析表明,各组均值之间存在显著差异(方差分析,p < 0.05)。复合树脂和复合体之间无显著差异,但两者在统计学上均高于银汞合金。断裂模式与剪切粘结强度值无关。本研究中获得的平均剪切粘结强度在统计学上与先前一项采用相同实验设计但纳入恒牙的研究结果相当。

相似文献

1
In vitro bonding efficacy of three restorative materials to primary dentin using a one-bottle adhesive system.使用单瓶粘结系统时三种修复材料与乳牙牙本质的体外粘结效果。
Gen Dent. 2001 Nov-Dec;49(6):624-31; quiz 632-3.
2
In vitro efficacy of a one-bottle adhesive system with three restorative materials.一种含三种修复材料的单瓶粘结系统的体外疗效
Gen Dent. 2000 Nov-Dec;48(6):694-9.
3
Bond strengths of composite resin and compomers in primary and permanent teeth.复合树脂和复合体在乳牙及恒牙中的粘结强度
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1997 Spring;21(3):223-9.
4
Shear bond strengths of two composite core materials after using all-in-one and single-bottle dentin adhesives.使用多合一和单瓶装牙本质粘合剂后两种复合核心材料的剪切粘结强度。
J Prosthodont. 2005 Jun;14(2):97-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00018.x.
5
Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.用汞合金和树脂复合材料修复体评估牙科粘结系统:微渗漏和粘结强度结果的比较
Oper Dent. 2000 Nov-Dec;25(6):512-9.
6
The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.单步粘结系统的不同干燥方法对牙齿颜色修复体微渗漏的影响。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2003 Feb 15;4(1):1-9.
7
Amalgam shear bond strength to dentin using single-bottle primer/adhesive systems.使用单瓶底漆/粘合剂系统时汞合金与牙本质的剪切粘结强度
Am J Dent. 1999 Oct;12(5):222-6.
8
Shear bond strength of composite resin and amalgam adhesive systems to dentin.复合树脂和汞合金粘结系统与牙本质的剪切粘结强度。
Am J Dent. 1999 Feb;12(1):19-25.
9
Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.牙本质粘结强度和边缘适应性:直接复合树脂与陶瓷嵌体的比较
Oper Dent. 1999 May-Jun;24(3):147-55.
10
Effect of different bonding conditions on the shear bond strength of two compomers to bovine dentin.不同粘结条件对两种复合体与牛牙本质剪切粘结强度的影响。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 Sep 1;7(4):9-16.