Suppr超能文献

使用多合一和单瓶装牙本质粘合剂后两种复合核心材料的剪切粘结强度。

Shear bond strengths of two composite core materials after using all-in-one and single-bottle dentin adhesives.

作者信息

Sen Deniz, Akgüngör Gökhan

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2005 Jun;14(2):97-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00018.x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strengths of 2 composite core materials after using all-in-one and single-bottle dentin bonding materials.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The occlusal surfaces of 100 extracted, intact human third molars were ground to expose a flattened area of dentin and polished with 600-grit silicon carbide paper. Specimens were divided into 5 main groups (n= 20). Three all-in-one (AQ Bond, One-Up Bond, Xeno-CF Bond) and 2 single-bottle adhesives (Single Bond, One-Step Plus) were used. Each group was further divided into 2 subgroups. Ti-Core and Built-it F.R. core materials were applied using a translucent plastic ring (diameter: 3 mm, height: 5 mm). After storage in 37 degrees C water for 24 hours, shear bond strengths were measured using a Universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Debonded dentin surfaces were examined with SEM. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparison (Tukey) tests were used for statistical analysis of data.

RESULTS

Two-way ANOVA revealed that the type of core material did not significantly influence the shear bond strength (p > 0.05), whereas there were significant differences in shear bond strength among the types of bonding agents (p < 0.0001). Shear bond strengths for single-bottle adhesive systems were significantly higher than those for all-in-one adhesive systems (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the interaction of these 2 parameters was not significant (p > 0.05). The fracture modes were predominantly adhesive for all-in-one adhesives and cohesive for single-bottle adhesives.

CONCLUSION

Bonding of composite core materials with the newly developed all-in-one dentin adhesives produced lower shear bond strengths as compared with single-bottle adhesives.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是比较在使用多合一和单瓶装牙本质粘结材料后两种复合核心材料的剪切粘结强度。

材料与方法

将100颗完整拔除的人第三磨牙的咬合面磨平以暴露牙本质的平整区域,并用600目碳化硅砂纸进行抛光。样本分为5个主要组(n = 20)。使用了三种多合一粘结剂(AQ Bond、One-Up Bond、Xeno-CF Bond)和两种单瓶装粘结剂(Single Bond、One-Step Plus)。每组进一步分为2个亚组。使用半透明塑料环(直径:3毫米,高度:5毫米)应用Ti-Core和Built-it F.R.核心材料。在37℃水中储存24小时后,使用万能试验机以0.5毫米/分钟的十字头速度测量剪切粘结强度。用扫描电子显微镜检查脱粘后的牙本质表面。采用双向方差分析(ANOVA)和多重比较(Tukey)检验对数据进行统计分析。

结果

双向方差分析显示,核心材料类型对剪切粘结强度没有显著影响(p > 0.05),而粘结剂类型之间的剪切粘结强度存在显著差异(p < 0.0001)。单瓶装粘结剂系统的剪切粘结强度显著高于多合一粘结剂系统(p < 0.05)。此外,这两个参数的相互作用不显著(p > 0.05)。多合一粘结剂的断裂模式主要为粘结性,单瓶装粘结剂的断裂模式主要为内聚性。

结论

与单瓶装粘结剂相比,使用新开发的多合一牙本质粘结剂粘结复合核心材料产生的剪切粘结强度较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验