Suppr超能文献

出院后清洁伤口感染:发病率被低估,危险因素被过度强调。

Postdischarge clean wound infections: incidence underestimated and risk factors overemphasized.

作者信息

Reid Richard, Simcock Jeremy W, Chisholm Linda, Dobbs Bruce, Frizelle Frank A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2002 May;72(5):339-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02403.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Wound infections are a leading cause of postoperative morbidity and a cost to both the individual and community. The surgeon now has a reduced appreciation of wound-infection rates because of shorter hospital stays and an increasing reliance on the primary care physicians. The incidence of wound infections which occurred following clean surgical procedures, as well as whether they could have been predicted by the known risk factors, were analysed in the present prospective study.

METHODS

A prospective audit of the first 30 postoperative days following clean general surgical wounds was undergone, with inpatient assessment by a research nurse, and subsequent outpatient followup by patient telephone interview.

RESULTS

Of 1964 clean wounds over a 30-month period, 98.5% were traced. The overall clean-wound infection rate was 12.6% (inpatient:4.5%; outpatient: 8.1%). Inpatient infection rates(but not postdischarge wound-infection rates) were significantly correlated (P < 0.05)to the American Society of Anesthesiologists' rating, operation duration, preoperative day stay, and age. Infection rates varied with operation type: vascular (18.3%), breast (16.0%),abdominal (10.3%), hernia (8.0%), head and neck (7.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall wound-infection rate is higher than previously described with two thirds of infections occurring after discharge. While inpatient wound-infection rates fit known risk factors, postdischarge wound-infection rates do not. Certain clean-wound operations have a higher incidence of infection than others. Consideration needs to be given to the identification of risk factors for postdischarge wound infections,and to further trials of prophylactic antibiotics in clean surgery.

摘要

背景

伤口感染是术后发病的主要原因,对个人和社会都会造成经济损失。由于住院时间缩短以及对初级保健医生的依赖增加,外科医生现在对伤口感染率的认识有所下降。在本前瞻性研究中,分析了清洁手术操作后发生伤口感染的发生率,以及是否可以通过已知风险因素进行预测。

方法

对清洁普通外科伤口术后的前30天进行前瞻性审计,由研究护士进行住院评估,并随后通过患者电话访谈进行门诊随访。

结果

在30个月期间的1964例清洁伤口中,98.5%得到追踪。总体清洁伤口感染率为12.6%(住院患者:4.5%;门诊患者:8.1%)。住院患者感染率(但出院后伤口感染率并非如此)与美国麻醉医师协会分级、手术持续时间、术前住院天数和年龄显著相关(P<0.05)。感染率因手术类型而异:血管手术(18.3%)、乳腺手术(16.0%)、腹部手术(10.3%)、疝气手术(8.0%)、头颈手术(7.1%)。

结论

总体伤口感染率高于先前描述的水平,三分之二的感染发生在出院后。虽然住院患者伤口感染率符合已知风险因素,但出院后伤口感染率并非如此。某些清洁伤口手术的感染发生率高于其他手术。需要考虑确定出院后伤口感染的风险因素,并进一步试验清洁手术中预防性抗生素的使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验