Citerio G, Cormio M, Sganzerla E P
Dipartimento di Anestesia e Rianimazione, A.O. San Gerardo, Monza, Milan, Italy.
Minerva Anestesiol. 2002 May;68(5):315-20.
Since 1990s, methylprednisolone has become a widely prescribed therapy for improving the outcome of acute spinal cord injured victims and has considered a standard of care based. This have been claimed on the results of two randomized controlled trials (NASCIS II and III), even if the studies failed to demonstrate improvements due to methylprednisolone administration in any of the a priori hypothesis tested. Although, post hoc analyses were carefully constructed for evidencing minimal benefits of the steroid therapy in subgroups of patients and were publicized worldwide, these presumed benefit have been extended to all acute spinal cord injured patients. Further analyses of the papers, devoid of the participation of the authors, performed by external reviewers and evidence-based experts, failed to demonstrate clinically significant treatment effects. For this reason and for the consideration that high dose methylprednisolone could be harmful to the patients, the use of methylprednisolone in acute spinal cord injury cannot be recommended and cannot be considered a standard of care.
自20世纪90年代以来,甲泼尼龙已成为一种广泛应用的疗法,用于改善急性脊髓损伤患者的预后,并被视为一种基于护理标准的疗法。这一观点基于两项随机对照试验(NASCIS II和III)的结果,尽管这些研究未能在任何预先设定的假设测试中证明甲泼尼龙给药能带来改善。尽管事后分析经过精心构建,以证明类固醇疗法在部分患者亚组中存在最小益处,并在全球范围内进行了宣传,但这些假定的益处已被推广到所有急性脊髓损伤患者。由外部评审人员和循证专家在未得到作者参与的情况下对这些论文进行的进一步分析,未能证明其具有临床显著的治疗效果。基于这个原因,并且考虑到高剂量甲泼尼龙可能对患者有害,不推荐在急性脊髓损伤中使用甲泼尼龙,也不能将其视为护理标准。