Sims A J, Bennett M K, Murray A
Regional Medical Physics Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Phys Med Biol. 2002 Apr 21;47(8):1255-66. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/8/303.
Objective measurements of tissue area during histological examination of carcinoma can yield valuable prognostic information. However, such measurements are not made routinely because the current manual approach is time consuming and subject to large statistical sampling error. In this paper, a semi-automated image analysis method for measuring tissue area in histological samples is applied to the measurement of stromal tissue, cell cytoplasm and lumen in samples of pancreatic carcinoma and compared with the standard manual point counting method. Histological samples from 26 cases of pancreatic carcinoma were stained using the sirius red, light-green method. Images from each sample were captured using two magnifications. Image segmentation based on colour cluster analysis was used to subdivide each image into representative colours which were classified manually into one of three tissue components. Area measurements made using this technique were compared to corresponding manual measurements and used to establish the comparative accuracy of the semi-automated image analysis technique, with a quality assurance study to measure the repeatability of the new technique. For both magnifications and for each tissue component, the quality assurance study showed that the semi-automated image analysis algorithm had better repeatability than its manual equivalent. No significant bias was detected between the measurement techniques for any of the comparisons made using the 26 cases of pancreatic carcinoma. The ratio of manual to semi-automatic repeatability errors varied from 2.0 to 3.6. Point counting would need to be increased to be between 400 and 1400 points to achieve the same repeatability as for the semi-automated technique. The results demonstrate that semi-automated image analysis is suitable for measuring tissue fractions in histological samples prepared with coloured stains and is a practical alternative to manual point counting.
在癌组织学检查期间对组织面积进行客观测量可产生有价值的预后信息。然而,此类测量未被常规进行,因为当前的手动方法耗时且存在较大的统计抽样误差。本文将一种用于测量组织学样本中组织面积的半自动图像分析方法应用于胰腺癌样本中基质组织、细胞质和管腔的测量,并与标准手动点计数法进行比较。对26例胰腺癌的组织学样本采用天狼星红-淡绿法进行染色。每个样本的图像以两种放大倍数采集。基于颜色聚类分析的图像分割用于将每个图像细分为代表性颜色,然后手动将其分类为三种组织成分之一。将使用该技术进行的面积测量与相应的手动测量进行比较,并用于确定半自动图像分析技术的相对准确性,同时进行质量保证研究以测量新技术的可重复性。对于两种放大倍数以及每种组织成分,质量保证研究表明半自动图像分析算法比其手动等效方法具有更好的可重复性。在使用26例胰腺癌进行的任何比较中,测量技术之间均未检测到显著偏差。手动与半自动重复性误差的比率在2.0至3.6之间变化。点计数需要增加到400至1400个点之间才能达到与半自动技术相同的可重复性。结果表明,半自动图像分析适用于测量用彩色染色剂制备的组织学样本中的组织分数,是手动点计数的一种实用替代方法。