Tohen Mauricio, Baker Robert W, Altshuler Lori L, Zarate Carlos A, Suppes Trisha, Ketter Terrence A, Milton Denai R, Risser Richard, Gilmore Julie A, Breier Alan, Tollefson Gary A
Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA.
Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Jun;159(6):1011-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.6.1011.
The effects of olanzapine and divalproex for the treatment of mania were compared in a large randomized clinical trial.
A 3-week, randomized, double-blind trial compared flexibly dosed olanzapine (5-20 mg/day) to divalproex (500-2500 mg/day in divided doses) for the treatment of patients hospitalized for acute bipolar manic or mixed episodes. The Young Mania Rating Scale and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale were used to quantify manic and depressive symptoms, respectively. Safety was assessed with several measures.
The protocol defined baseline-to-endpoint improvement in the mean total score on the Young Mania Rating Scale as the primary outcome variable. The mean Young Mania Rating Scale score decreased by 13.4 for patients treated with olanzapine (N=125) and 10.4 for those treated with divalproex (N=123). A priori categorizations defined response and remission rates: 54.4% of olanzapine-treated patients responded (> or = 50% reduction in Young Mania Rating Scale score), compared to 42.3% of divalproex-treated patients; 47.2% of olanzapine-treated patients had remission of mania symptoms (endpoint Young Mania Rating Scale < or = 12), compared to 34.1% of divalproex-treated patients. The decrease in Hamilton depression scale score was similar in the two treatment groups. Completion rates for the 3-week study were similar in both groups. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (incidence >10%) occurring more frequently during treatment with olanzapine were dry mouth, increased appetite, and somnolence. For divalproex, nausea was more frequently observed. The average weight gain with olanzapine treatment was 2.5 kg, compared to 0.9 kg with divalproex treatment.
The olanzapine treatment group had significantly greater mean improvement of mania ratings and a significantly greater proportion of patients achieving protocol-defined remission, compared with the divalproex treatment group. Significantly more weight gain and cases of dry mouth, increased appetite, and somnolence were reported with olanzapine, while more cases of nausea were reported with divalproex.
在一项大型随机临床试验中比较奥氮平和丙戊酸治疗躁狂症的效果。
一项为期3周的随机双盲试验,将灵活给药的奥氮平(5 - 20毫克/天)与丙戊酸(分剂量500 - 2500毫克/天)用于治疗因急性双相躁狂或混合发作而住院的患者。分别使用杨氏躁狂评定量表和汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表来量化躁狂和抑郁症状。通过多种测量方法评估安全性。
该方案将杨氏躁狂评定量表平均总分从基线到终点的改善定义为主要结局变量。接受奥氮平治疗的患者(N = 125)杨氏躁狂评定量表平均分下降了13.4,接受丙戊酸治疗的患者(N = 123)下降了10.4。预先分类定义了缓解率和有效率:54.4%接受奥氮平治疗的患者有反应(杨氏躁狂评定量表评分降低≥50%),而接受丙戊酸治疗的患者为42.3%;47.2%接受奥氮平治疗的患者躁狂症状缓解(终点杨氏躁狂评定量表≤12),而接受丙戊酸治疗的患者为34.1%。两个治疗组汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分的降低相似。两组3周研究的完成率相似。在奥氮平治疗期间更频繁出现的最常见治疗中出现的不良事件(发生率>10%)是口干、食欲增加和嗜睡。对于丙戊酸,更频繁观察到恶心。奥氮平治疗的平均体重增加为2.5千克,而丙戊酸治疗为0.9千克。
与丙戊酸治疗组相比,奥氮平治疗组在躁狂评定方面的平均改善明显更大,达到方案定义缓解的患者比例明显更高。奥氮平报告的体重增加以及口干、食欲增加和嗜睡的病例明显更多,而丙戊酸报告的恶心病例更多。