Bilder Robert M, Goldman Robert S, Volavka Jan, Czobor Pal, Hoptman Matthew, Sheitman Brian, Lindenmayer Jean-Pierre, Citrome Leslie, McEvoy Joseph, Kunz Michal, Chakos Miranda, Cooper Thomas B, Horowitz Terri L, Lieberman Jeffrey A
Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY 10962, USA.
Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Jun;159(6):1018-28. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.6.1018.
Newer antipsychotic drugs have shown promise in ameliorating neurocognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia, but few studies have compared newer antipsychotic drugs with both clozapine and conventional agents, particularly in patients who have had suboptimal response to prior treatments.
The authors examined the effects of clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol on 16 measures of neurocognitive functioning in a double-blind, 14-week trial involving 101 patients. A global score was computed along with scores in four neurocognitive domains: memory, attention, motor function, and general executive and perceptual organization.
Global neurocognitive function improved with olanzapine and risperidone treatment, and these improvements were superior to those seen with haloperidol. Patients treated with olanzapine exhibited improvement in the general and attention domains but not more than that observed with other treatments. Patients treated with risperidone exhibited improvement in memory that was superior to that of both clozapine and haloperidol. Clozapine yielded improvement in motor function but not more than in other groups. Average effect sizes for change were in the small to medium range. More than half of the patients treated with olanzapine and risperidone experienced "clinically significant" improvement (changes in score of at least one-half standard deviation relative to baseline). These findings did not appear to be mediated by changes in symptoms, side effects, or blood levels of medications.
Patients with a history of suboptimal response to conventional treatments may show cognitive benefits from newer antipsychotic drugs, and there may be differences between atypical antipsychotic drugs in their patterns of cognitive effects.
新型抗精神病药物在改善精神分裂症患者的神经认知缺陷方面已显示出前景,但很少有研究将新型抗精神病药物与氯氮平及传统药物进行比较,尤其是在对先前治疗反应欠佳的患者中。
作者在一项为期14周的双盲试验中,对101例患者使用氯氮平、奥氮平、利培酮和氟哌啶醇,检测它们对16项神经认知功能指标的影响。计算了一个总体评分以及四个神经认知领域的评分:记忆、注意力、运动功能以及一般执行和感知组织能力。
奥氮平和利培酮治疗可改善总体神经认知功能,且这些改善优于氟哌啶醇。接受奥氮平治疗的患者在一般和注意力领域有改善,但不超过其他治疗组所观察到的改善程度。接受利培酮治疗的患者在记忆方面的改善优于氯氮平和氟哌啶醇。氯氮平使运动功能得到改善,但不超过其他组。变化的平均效应大小在小到中等范围内。接受奥氮平和利培酮治疗的患者中,超过一半经历了“临床上显著的”改善(相对于基线,评分变化至少为半个标准差)。这些发现似乎不是由症状、副作用或药物血药浓度的变化所介导的。
对传统治疗反应欠佳的患者可能会从新型抗精神病药物中获得认知益处,并且非典型抗精神病药物在认知效应模式上可能存在差异。